A (new) child to save us.

Last post I noted the uncanny resemblance between Greta Thunberg and the “Fearless Girl” statue.  Another example of the bratty girl as savior archetype that is so common today is Laura from the movie Logan (violence warning):

The symbolism of a child come to save us from our own sin (Wall Street greed, Climate Change, etc.) is painfully obvious.  Social Justice Warriors have not only rejected Christ, they are desperately trying to make their own.  This is industrial strength feminist territory marking.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Fearless Girl, Feminist Territory Marking, Greta Thunberg, Movies, Moxie, Social Justice Warriors, Ugly Feminists. Bookmark the permalink.

68 Responses to A (new) child to save us.

  1. vfm7916 says:

    The Babylon Bee has the correct take on the mentally retarded Greta.

    As a corollary, who here listened to the entirety of President Trump’s speech to the UN yesterday?
    Did you get squirreled, or did you listen with awe?

  2. Nate the Reformer says:

    *CAUTION: Contains Logan spoilers*

    While the movie definitely prominently featured the tiny-but-kick-butt Action Girl trope, I didn’t get any specific feminist/SJW vibes from the film. Even in this clip, she gets momentarily overpowered by soldiers and needs the stronger Logan to save her, which is both realistic and anathema to feminist thought. The main themes of the movie are suffering & family, and it seemed to me to be both redemptive & unintentionally Christian (in its theme/tone), as Logan finally listens to his father figure (Charles Xavier) and gives up his selfishness & depression to fight for his new family, eventually sacrificing himself to save his new “daughter”.

    Or maybe I’m just biased because I thought Logan was a masterpiece, at least as a comic book/superhero film.

    https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ActionGirl

  3. Too bad the soldiers’ guns only have a range of 3 feet. Otherwise they could shoot her beyond the range of her claws.

  4. Anonymous Reader says:

    Logan is just an extension of the “fearless girl” we’ve seen in movies for a few years. The remake of Road Warrior or even Crouching Tiger to some extent. As long as Hollywood is making comic-book movies this will continue. It’s another indication we are not yet at peak feminism.

  5. Scott says:

    Everything is stupid

  6. Her screeching and clawing, if that’s supposed to be testosterone inducing appealing to men, epic fail.

  7. Scott, no, everything is awesome. Ask leggos.

  8. Similarly Hannah on Amazon. I’ve not reviewed old posts here so she may have been addressed awhile back

  9. Frank K says:

    “Everything is stupid”

    I have completely given up on movies, TV, etc. The incessant propaganda is numbing.

  10. Pingback: A (new) child to save us. | Reaction Times

  11. PokeSalad says:

    Children’s Crusade, c. 1205

  12. cshort says:

    @PokeSalad

    As far as I can tell the adults were telling the kids to stay or go home in that instance…

  13. PokeSalad says:

    …result will be the same

  14. PokeSalad says:

    Greta: The Ultimate Mary Sue? 😉

  15. locustsplease says:

    I remember the commercials for the bratty girl who listens to no one wolverine. How can i watch a movie when i want the supposed hero to b exterminated. Just the few seconds of animal growling and exageration of abilities was too much.

  16. buckyinky says:

    When will feminists take on the equal rights of women in movies to be sliced to ribbons as nameless props?

  17. Jack Russell says:

    Dinesh D’Souza found a Nazi poster where a young girl with pigtails used for propaganda poster.
    https://metro.co.uk/2019/09/23/greta-thunberg-compared-nazi-propaganda-girl-us-commentator-10790893/

    Socialists seem to like using children for their propaganda.

  18. TheTraveler says:

    Nothing new here.

    Lots of old Soviet propaganda with girls who have braided hair. Unlike poor whats-er-name, they were all gorgeous.

    In the mid-70s, also about the environment, during the so-called “energy crisis” (really a low-production conspiracy), there was a snotty, self-righteous pre-teen boy doing commercials. He walked around various national landmarks (the Statue of Liberty stands out in memory), lecturing America about being such energy-hog immoral scumbags. There were three or four such commercials, and at the end of each one, this nasty little twit sniveled a tagline in aggressive whine: “Come on adults, give us kids a chance.”

    Amazing, how fascists ALWAYS use children. Despicable, really.

  19. Anonymous Reader says:

    Dinesh D’Souza found a Nazi poster where a young girl with pigtails used for propaganda poster

    Yeah, those Nazis hamburgers are way too popular,Someone should do something.

  20. Spike says:

    Greta is the Left’s perfect human shield. She gets to say what she likes. If you disagree, you are a selfish, greedy, right wing, narrow minded bigoted, sexist swine.
    Her handler,s from parents through to the Gateses, Bono “Talk Jesus, walk Satan” Vox and the human toad, George Soro must know she has a host of behavioural and possibly mental illnesses, meaning they are complicit in child abuse.

    The symbolism of girl as saviour, once seen can’t be unseen. It’s horrifying.

  21. Oscar says:

    @ Spike

    Greta is the Left’s perfect human shield. She gets to say what she likes. If you disagree, you are a selfish, greedy, right wing, narrow minded bigoted, sexist swine.

    That tactic doesn’t seem to be working as well as it used to, probably because the entire Left Wing tried to get a bunch Catholic school boys murdered for wearing hats.

  22. white says:

    a 16 yo is not a “child”, she’s old enough to be mother of Christ. Greta is too old for the whole pigtail child gimmick… but that seems to be exactly the point. Squeeze a hormonal teen into a child’s outfit and have her scold imaginary adults. Maximum catharsis reached, that is if you are another teenager.

  23. Rpro says:

    To GOD be the glory, now and forever.

  24. Just Beers says:

    Of course, it’s the unabated feminine hunger for safety and security that fuels over-consumption, but whatever.

  25. sipcode says:

    ” industrial strength feminist territory marking”

    Whore of Babylon magnitude strength.

  26. Swanny River says:

    White,
    I don’t know if this was your point, but I bet Greta is greatly successful at encouraging other teenagers to see acting dishonorably as virtuous.
    I see these crazy tactics, like the latest Trump impeachment, as probably being useful for the left. Sean Hannity keeps saying this will blow up on them. I wish I could bet him on that. It moves and solidifies the window leftward, just like Dalrock effectively points out by saying the statue and Greta are territory marking.

  27. white says:

    @Swanny River

    not American so I don’t follow finer details of American politics, my point was simply that by pretending Greta is a child, the UN managed to stir up teenagers in a visceral way. After all, it’s so simple that even children understand, and the UN sanctions her speech (so it must be legit). Why can’t the adults just go along? Why are old men just so… stupid?

    As for the window swinging leftward, I’m afraid it already did the minute Trump won the elections back in 2016. Before Trump there was no figurehead for the rebellious to hate, and progressives are running out of issues to cry murder about. So naturally teenagers, sick of being told to be PC, want to be rebel against PC culture. A good example being PewdiePie and his army of fans. It was an exciting time back then, there was genuine hope the future can be “woker” than the past. With Trump’s election now there is a face to hate, a cause to stand against. Children entering puberty after 2016 (12 13 14 yos) will grow up rebelling against this new face, and just like that the Left wrestled back control of the narrative. After all, Trump is president, so the Left must be right that they/women/minorities/etc are oppressed! Where are these “white supremacists”? “Those who voted Trump!” Where are these “misogynists”? “Those who voted Trump!”

    This isn’t just the case in US, Trump’s effect is worldwide. Now the “Gretas” of the world has a face to hate, to scold.

    The Right always pretend the Left don’t know what they’re doing, that so and so will “blow up eventually”. But Progressives always win in the long run. Always. Take a look at any other country in the world and you’ll observe this same pattern. And that’s why I am quite confident Trump will win the next elections too, because the Left needs Trump to stay exactly where he is. And the Right will help the Left achieve their goals (by voting Trump)…. as usual.

  28. white says:

    @swanny river

    *and the UN approves her speech

  29. Liz says:

    And that’s why I am quite confident Trump will win the next elections too, because the Left needs Trump to stay exactly where he is. And the Right will help the Left achieve their goals (by voting Trump)…. as usual.

    Yes, Obama and Clinton did a lot of harm to the leftist cause and kept them from achieving their goals.
    [/sarcasm]

  30. Liz says:

    We were all supposed to have died of AIDs by now.

  31. TheTraveler says:

    @white

    What with you being non-American, such defeatist pessimism, mixed with cynicism I find breathtaking even by manosphere standards, may be why the U.S. is one of the few countries that still has a chance to fight this off.

  32. PokeSalad says:

    So, what’s the latest on Scoldilocks?

  33. American says:

    What these mini-feminist created brats need are one biological male and one biological female parent set of two who will teach them truth, instead of lies, and model creator God’s design for humanity to them in real life by living it out. That, and by the looks of them, a long overdue spanking.

  34. Someone says:

    I was thinking today that maybe if some of these kids are so concerned with AGW, they could start by walking to school and particularly one with the air conditioner and heating turned off as appropriate. I’m sure some kids in third world countries have higher academic ability and don’t necessarily three meals per day and comfortable classrooms.

  35. Sven says:

    Damn. Those guys are worse shots than storm troopers.

  36. Spike says:

    Someone says:
    September 26, 2019 at 8:32 pm
    I was thinking today that maybe if some of these kids are so concerned with AGW, they could start by walking to school and particularly one with the air conditioner and heating turned off as appropriate. I’m sure some kids in third world countries have higher academic ability and don’t necessarily three meals per day and comfortable classrooms.

    It’s not just those. As many critics of these enviro-student protestors have pointed out, in order to be consistent, they should vow:
    -to not have a mobile phone, laptop or tablet.
    -to not have those expensive extra-curricular lessons that require your parents to drive you to
    -to not buy and drive a car
    -to not go on those jet-fuelled holidays abroad
    -to not work in an air-conditioned office, or work requiring refrigeration or heating
    -to not change fashion but wait for clothes to wear out
    -to not indulge in buying unregulated (and therefore polluting) illegal drugs

    …a list that could go on and on, because they have an unparalleled standard of living, courtesy of their collective parents and grandparents

  37. white says:

    @TheTraveler

    You do have a fighting chance, if you guys elect Hilary next year. Or anyone on the Left so completely lacking in charisma. Give young people of the world a face from the Left to hate, a figurehead representing all authority and “progressiveness” so they can rebel against. But to do that you would first have to come to the realization that all your votes ultimately do nothing (other than create figureheads), and that is a realization the manosphere doesn’t seem to have come to yet.

  38. Aaron says:

    To Dalrock,

    I no longer believe you are real and honest, I think you are just a phoney-baloney, professional crap stirrer. Honestly, I truly believe that now. Anybody who has actually watched Logan, would be able to grasp something beyond your “bratty girl as saviour archetype.”

    And here’s my point that proves it, (and this is directed more at Larry Kummer’s comment, but it also applies to Dalrock), so read carefully:

    If you actually had watched Logan, you’d know that her bones are covered in a rare metal which is the hardest known to exist, and therefore bullets would just bounce off her. Not only that, she also has Logan’s nearly immortal healing power.

    So if you combine near immortal healing power, and a nearly indestructible metal skeleton, then bullets, no matter the range, are pointless. If you and Larry actually watched the movie, than it would be obvious that guns with a range of more than 3 feet would still be pointless. I mean, did you actually watch the ending of the movie? Probably not.

    I’ve watched Logan, and I didn’t see ANY of the “bratty girl as Saviour archetype” crap that you prescribe to it. Your assesment of the movie is so way off, that I have to wonder how much other stuff around here is way off too. This has been the most eye opening post I’ve ever read on your blog in the years I’ve been reading it. How can you watch that movie and come up with your conclusions? I already know Larry is skewed, and a control freak for editing negative comments on his blog, so I’m dismayed that you’re starting to sound like him.

    That’s the reason I think your blog is phoney now, you can’t even watch a movie without a chicken little, they sky is falling and we’re all gonna die mindset, like Larry. You invent conspiracies and evil intentions where none exist.

  39. Red Pill Latecomer says:

    I’ve never even heard of Logan, but it doesn’t matter WHY any character has superpowers.

    A little girl with superpowers is a fantasy that feeds the Grrrl Power fantasy (i.e., that normal girls can do this too). Little girls are meant to identify with such superheroes.

    Logan is a Grrrl Power archetype. It doesn’t matter what gobbledygook BS rationale the movie uses to explain her superpowers.

  40. Swanny River says:

    Aaron,
    I’m really sorry you think the movie is worth standing up for. It’s your right to say what you will, but to twist the idea of truth such that you find it godly and righteous to drop Dalrock for the sske of a female superhero is strange.

  41. Swanny River says:

    Aaron, so you really think the movie does more for glorifying Christ than Dalrock does when he calls such a movie as territory marking?
    Do you really think Dalrock doesn’t know what powers Wolverine has? Maybe he doesn’t, even so, he’s still right about territory marking. You are unintentionally declaring yourself good with it, but you don’t think you are because you think you are just being an objective movie reviewer. I’ve been there and still have such blindnesses in my life, so even though you’ll spit at me for my sympathy, I am sorry for you.

  42. Wobs says:

    Logan is a great film, and not what is stated here.

    Spoiler alert:
    However, The Wolverine (again, a great film), is essentially a film about Wolverine visiting Japan, and it turns out that if you are female and Japanese, you are good, but if you are male (except Wolverine), you are bad.

  43. Lost Patrol says:

    Someday I hope to sit down with Dalrock over a pint and ask him to tell stories of his blogging career where the point he was trying to make sailed by like a ship in the night.

    I say that as a man that has no doubt missed the boat more than a time or two.

  44. Swanny River says:

    Lost Patrol,
    Apparently I missed the point of the post also, Dalrock intended to branch out into movie reviews. Got it, great movie, so Dalrock didn’t and is either wrong or purposefully misleading.

  45. Clemsnman says:

    I thought the most plausible part of Logan was the intact black family pulling a horse trailer to their farm in Iowa. lawd.

  46. Frank K says:

    To say that Pop Culture glorifies the Lord is utterly risible. It has become so woke, so propaganda laden, that it makes my stomach churn. And the hard turn left has been quick and so in your face that you can’t help but notice it. I used to attend the local Comic Con, until I noticed the change begin about four years ago, and it intensified when Trump was elected,

    I get that the Left isn’t happy that he won, but the last thing I want is for the local comic con to get politicized, and it did big time. And I know that actors and artists are mostly leftists, but I didn’t attend the convention to hear Antifa propaganda, so I quit attending, and apparently so have others, as the attendance has dropped significantly.

    The cinema has become a place I rarely attend, The constant stream of propaganda has turned me off. I haven’t been to see any of the recent Marvel or DC movies. The last movie I saw was Tolkien, which I later learned his family despised because it was so inaccurate. Then again, why should I be surprised?

  47. Novaseeker says:

    Folks who like the pop culture today are sorely misguided. That culture is out to vilify you, if you are a white, straight man. If you do not see that, you are blind. The entirety of it, soup to nuts, has this theme, and the so-called “superhero” films are filled with it as well.

    I stopped participating in popular culture several years ago — all of it, movies, TV, popular music, professional sports. It’s all junk that reflects a culture that hates me and wants ill for me. Why would I patronize it when there are far more edifying cultural sources from the past that are available?

  48. Anonymous Reader says:

    When a person is immersed in the stream of popular culture via movies & video, those of us who aren’t in the stream look strange; we aren’t going with the flow. As someone who checked out of a lot of pop culture years ago, those floating with the current look strange.

    A friend of mine was a big fan of the old show Roseanne, and then Modern Family. His opinions have been affected by the video he consumes.

    Edmund Bernays would nod in approval.

  49. Anonymous Reader says:

    Novaseeker
    I stopped participating in popular culture several years ago — all of it, movies, TV, popular music, professional sports.

    I checked out of the pop culture by accident; my work schedule wouldn’t allow it. As a result I found people around me were getting stranger and stranger.

    It’s all junk that reflects a culture that hates me and wants ill for me

    Or just wants to eat your time. Much of pop culture is like a bigger version of the tabloids at the supermarket checkout.

  50. Red Pill Christianity says:

    Speaking of “fearless girls”….

    Last evening, one of my Red-Pilled group members texted me to watch a “TV show that I would love” called “StumpTown”. Coincidence of all, the pilot episode was going to start in 20mins, so I set the DVR and went about my business.

    I watched the TV show this morning. Clearly, they were pulling my leg about the show, since it is about radical feminism at its worse, BUT, the show had some really revealing RP truths (spoilers below):

    *The main character is Dex (she is the actress who was the weak-acting Agent Hill from the Avengers movie series). In “Stumptown”, she is a military veteran with PTSD and works as a super-PI of sorts. She is badass and complicated, of course, two core feminist tropes.

    *Having PTSD enables her to claim “bad tough girl status” while eliciting sympathy as a victim, (since our troops are the only US institution left with any credibility) and enables the character to engage in all sorts of feminist bad behaviors without consequence.

    *For example: Dex has a serious gambling problem, is broke because of that, and obviously, she also a lying problem and she seems to drink a lot, so add alcohol problem to her list of issues. Would not be surprised if she goes to the VA and loads up on prescription pills in future episodes, but I won’t going to be watching this, but if I was a betting man, she will get on pills too.

    Of course, she credits ALL her problems to her PTSD, therefore “it is not her fault”. Hamster!!!

    Dex also has a good-looking and tall Beta dude in her life, who not only cares about her and even bonds her out of jail, but he also employees her younger brother, who has severe case of Down Syndrome.

    So he is a good guy all around…. which means…. LACK OF VAG TINGLES for Dex!

    How does Dex, a typical feminist, deals with the good guy she has “had a crush on all her life?” By banging this light-skinned black dude on the side, who initially appears to be gay, but clearly, that may be just a cover so they can hook-up. (??)

    The good guy in her life seems clueless she is banging a dude on the side (or like sbeing cuckolded, to be revealed in future episodes?). He may not have any clue, either because the black dude pretends to be gay or because he is just a good man, with a good heart.

    Red-Pilled basics tells us that Good guy = she needs a side fu#k buddy and uses the good guy as her “back-up plan”/BetaBux, who does everything for her, including employing her un-employable little brother out of the kindness of his heart.

    The weird thing is that the black dude appears to be either a colossal Beta himself who acts “semi-gay” or who pretends to be this way to keep Dex on the side without her Beta BF knowing. If the black guy turns out to really be a Beta, then he is enjoying AAA (Automatic Alpha Assumption), which many black guys benefit from in today’s America.

    Anyway, I could go on and on about this 30-minute time-waster, but you catch the drift.

    The Feminists and their Leftist enablers will surely RAVE and rant about “how amazing this show is”. Truth is, it is poorly acted and the main story plot of the pilot episode was extremely weak as is, but why does that it matter? It is feminist manna.

    This feminist TV show sure reveals plenty about how Feminism and Leftist ideology really works in real life. To be honest, I am glad they are putting it out there openly on TV, so even the blue-pillers amongst us can start seeing some truth for a change.

    Watch out for the “mainstream media” reviews, they will be raving positive.

  51. Novaseeker says:

    If the black guy turns out to really be a Beta, then he is enjoying AAA (Automatic Alpha Assumption), which many black guys benefit from in today’s America.

    That’s true, but there’s also strong elements of transgression (“this will piss off my asshole controlling father”) and politics (blacks and single white women are generally political allies against all white men). For many women this cocktail — AAA, transgression and political “righteousness” (just feels more moral than dating another privileged white male oppressor) is irresistible, and it certainly is great fodder for a feminist TV show like that one.

  52. Red Pill Christianity says:

    Novaseeker says: That’s true, but there’s also strong elements of transgression (“this will piss off my asshole controlling father”) and politics (blacks and single white women are generally political allies against all white men). For many women this cocktail — AAA, transgression and political “righteousness” (just feels more moral than dating another privileged white male oppressor) is irresistible, and it certainly is great fodder for a feminist TV show like that one.

    You are right on, Nova. AAA is a very real thing, though. I knew black dudes in school that were literally smacked around by their blackwomen (who were 200lbs+ fatter than they were) and these dudes were the biggest betas ever. But many assumed they were Alpha due to their skin color. It is all media driven.

    When was the last time you saw a white male and a white female in a TV commercials where the white male is an Alpha and not a pot-bellied, weakling loser? Maybe 10 years ago?

    Almost all TV ads today show white females and black males as the standard, even if they are not a couple.

    When white males are in TV ads, they are weak, pathetic, beta, and are often the bad guys. How many ads of Identity Theft or burglary do you see where an upper middle class black family is being targeted by white male criminals? Demonizing white men is a national hobby of the elites today. It is 24/7.

    This is not on accident. Gavin McInnis, a former advertising executive, explains this here:

    (Cuckmercials) – funny, but true.

    My understanding today is Leftism today is simply about feeling moral superior than others. Facts are irrelevant, as long as you can claim you are on the “right side of history”, so to speak.

    If you have to eliminate an entire race of people or destroy a country, it is all good, as long as they feel morally superior.

  53. Novaseeker says:

    RPC —

    Yes, it’s about the perceived (by them) morality of it. It is moral to make advertisements that promote WW/BM relationships and/or ones that denigrate WW/WM relationships (by making the husband out to be a buffoon), because this furthers the moral imperative of dismantling straight, white male privilege. It does so by making it clear that white men don’t deserve anything at all, really, because they are all such buffoons. It makes much more sense to date black men, doesn’t it, white girls? Wouldn’t you rather do that than contribute to undeserved privilege of these white male buffoons?

    It’s also the case that this makes the typical left viewer, and the typical young, single white female viewer feel more righteous just by viewing it — it’s morally satisfying in the sense that “the great arc of history is bending towards justice” by marginalizing straight white men like they deserve. Black viewers are of course mixed because black women are very antagonized by pairing off the limited number of eligible black guys with white women, but they are not an important market like single white women are, so their concerns take a back seat.

    Essentially this is primarily about marketing to single young white women.

  54. Red Pill Christianity says:

    Novaseeker says: It makes much more sense to date black men, doesn’t it, white girls? Wouldn’t you rather do that than contribute to undeserved privilege of these white male buffoons?

    It’s also the case that this makes the typical left viewer, and the typical young, single white female viewer feel more righteous just by viewing it — it’s morally satisfying in the sense that “the great arc of history is bending towards justice” by marginalizing straight white men like they deserve. Essentially this is primarily about marketing to single young white women.

    The Left intends to push the “Brazilification of America”. That means encouraging and promoting racial mixing at any costs, ending religious and speech freedoms, impoverishing the middle class, and disarming 95% of the population to ensure they cannot fight back. Criminals will have such an upper hand, the elites will use “ending crime” to push policies that give them almost monarchical control of the country.

    If you want to see what America will look like in 30 years, go to Brazil today.
    Brazil today is America 30 years in the future (post illegal alien amnesty).
    America today was Brazil 50 years ago.

    It is an ugly reality. Brazil is a hellhole. Everyone hates everyone else, no one has anything else in common with one another. They distrust each other passionately there. And the middle class is now all poor, crime is absurdly high, and the country is in a constant state of economic recession.

    Feminism, for the most part, is a privileged white woman thing. That is because they have life handed to them in a silver platter from day 1. Think Greta Thunberg, the UN Asperger harpy.

    Shows like Stumptown are 100% catered to white feminists. They seem to be clear about it, it is out in the open now.

    The interesting thing is that white women are simply a tool of the moment for the Left. Look how Black Americans were at the center of the Democratic party in California 20 years ago. Today, black Americans barely have a seat at the table. Blacks were sold out for Hispanics, the new super majority of California. And incredibly, most still vote Democrat anyway. The Left is masterful at controlling people.

    It will be the same with white women nationally in America. Their privileged and protected class will be pulled form under them suddenly and quickly once the Left gets an illegal alien amnesty and between 20 and 80 million new voters in 10 short years post-Amnesty.

    By then white women can block vote with white males and they will be a minority nationally, no matter what.

    Same deal with the dumb Socialist Swedish broads out there holding “Refugees Welcome” posters. In just 15 years the Muslims will be over 51% of the population and will impose Sharia Law on all Swedes. Greta will then wake up, but will be too late. A reason to laugh at her whole speech over the weekend! 🙂

  55. Aaron says:

    The Morality Police here, who are pure and good (in their own minds of course), would probably ban Logan if they could, and every other non-christian movie (like the Inquisition of the 21st century)…. then they’d start telling everybody what to do, what to wear, what movies to watch, what to think…. and then everybody is one step away from telling women they can’t drive and have to wear Burqas. And then all you cowards will go along with this group-think, then before you know it, slavery is re-instituted… only men can own property and vote, and on and on.

  56. Aaron says:

    @ Swannyriver

    Swanny, I never mentioned Christ in my first post. I just think Dalrock is the new Cotton Mather. He’s the new Movie Inquisitor. He might as well start his own rating system. Dalrock Approved, watch this movie at the peril of your soul!!!

  57. Jason says:

    Great…she’s armed like her father and she’s autistic too.

  58. Oscar says:

    @ Aaron

    And here’s my point that proves it, (and this is directed more at Larry Kummer’s comment, but it also applies to Dalrock), so read carefully:

    If you actually had watched Logan, you’d know that her bones are covered in a rare metal which is the hardest known to exist, and therefore bullets would just bounce off her.

    As my drill sergeant once told me, “you dun’ f***ed up, son”.

    If you actually had watched Logan, you’d know that only Laura’s claws are covered in adamantium, because the rest of her bones need to be able to continue to grow, unlike Logan, who had adamantium bonded to his entire skeleton as an adult.

    You’d also know that bullets don’t “just bounce off” either Logan, or Laura.

    In this scene she gets shot through with a harpoon.

    The only part you got right was…

    Not only that, she also has Logan’s nearly immortal healing power.

    Other than that, all you proved is that you don’t know what you’re talking about.

  59. Swanny River says:

    Aaron,
    I appreciate that you responded. Your slippery slope is dramatic but even so, you are not in a good spot if you have to choose between the removal of non-Christian movies, repeal of the 19th amendment, even slavery, or the saving of your soul, and you choose movies.
    You call others cowards. I certainly am compared to others here, such as Deti. But it would probably be good for you to bore down and explain what you think the men here are afraid of. Strong women perhaps?

  60. Swanny River says:

    Oscar and Aaron,
    One thing I am afraid of is ugly female faces and from the clips above, the female actress does it routinely.
    I’d rather see Breakfast at Tiffany’s, at least the crazy woman is gorgeous to look at.

  61. Red Pill Christianity says:

    I am confused. Logan was one of THE weakest of all of the X-Men movie series. I did not know about the feminist tropes when I went to see “Logan”. The movie is about an older and weaker Wolverine but the movie surprises us by showing his rage-filled, borderline irrational daughter (that he did not know he had).

    What could have been a cool superhero movie turned out to be a feminist crapfest. How is that Dalrock’s fault for watching it? None of the previews I saw before I watched the movie (at home) showed any feminism.

    So I watched Logan. It sucked, but it was actually better than The Wolverine, which was even dumber and more pointless IMHO. The more PC movies become, the worst they are. How are we supposed to know by just watching a 2 minute movie preview?

    Banning movies is not the solution. Banning and the “Cancel Culture” are traits of the Socialist left. And seriously, we have much better stuff to worry about and to fight to fix than dumb movies everyone forgets just a few hours after watching it anyway.

    We should be focusing on fixing real issues, like the divorce rape laws, unfair policing, false accusations by women being taken as truth in court/workplaces, out of control feminism in our colleges, mass indoctrination of American children by “public” schools, atheists trying to ban every mention of Christianity in public life, churches embracing Marxist Christianity, the fast deterioration of religious freedoms, the attempted leftist coup against the most pro-religious freedom President in US history, and never-ending MeToo hysterias…. just to name a few of the more pressing problems than banning movies.

    Focus, Daniel-San, focus!

  62. Anonymous Reader says:

    RPC wrote
    We should be focusing on fixing real issues,

    Wow, no one ever thought of that before. You’re amazing. You thought of that all by yourself?
    Will your blog be back up soon?

  63. Red Pill Christianity says:

    Anonymous Reader, it is people like you who takes the focus away from who the real enemy is. Instead of focusing your fire on the enemy (feminists, leftists, the elites, globalists, etc), you choose to mock and belittle others who should be on your side. You are the last guy I would want on a supressive fire when we charge towards the enemy. You target your own troops.

    Same with you guys attacking MGTOWs or mocking men who got DivorceRaped, calling Red Pillers who believe in Game un-Christian… It is all pointless drivel.

    Don’t you understand that the Left, with its numerous globalist, feminist, and well-financed elites have created a system that was decided to take our heads off and destroy us and the Christian faith for good? They work in perfect unison.

    Turn on and watch the Commie News Network (CNN) and then compare it to every Demoncrat in the country and every other leftist news channel. They are coordinated on message, saying same things and working towards the same goals. Their message is to destroy Christianity and everything that is good left in this world, including our faith, masculinity, and freedom. .

    No wonder Christians always lose virtually every cultural and legislative battles. The focus is almost always on the wrong targets.

    Anonymous Reader is just another poster-child for the divisive and un-focused side of the ManoSphere.

  64. Anonymous Reader says:

    Anonymous Reader, it is people like you who takes the focus away from who the real enemy is

    Seriously doubt anybody reads your tl;dr more than a time or two. Because it’s the same stuff over and over and over again, very repetitive, tedious, like someone’s grandpa raving about Eisenhower or Kennedy.

    You are the last guy I would want on a supressive fire when we charge towards the enemy.

    LOL! Your LARPing is funny. It’s even better when you do it in that pompous, Boomer, know-it-all fashion.

    Don’t you understand that the Left

    When did you first read Solzhentisyn?

    When is your blog going back up?

  65. Red Pill Christianity says:

    You are clearly a Blue-Pilled Beta who never gets any, so I do not really not interested in what you have to say. Being honest here, not trying to be hurtful or anything. This is a Red Pill discussion for adults, trying to Blue Pill people is not really helpful.

    As painful as it may be, taking TRP is the path of truth and ultimately of happiness. One cannot be truly happy unless they are truly free to think and make choices based on facts, not fantasies.

    The truth hurts sometimes, but it is life-changing. Give it a try. 😉

  66. Anonymous Reader says:

    Red Pill something
    LOL @ your feeble AMOGing attempt, it’s as lame as your LARPing.

    The Glasses:
    When did you first read J.D. Unwin?

    Leftism:
    When did you first read Solzhenitsyn?

    What do you do besides rant in comboxes? How’s that “red pill” church group going, eh?

    When is your blog going back up?

  67. Pingback: She’s their successor to Christ, their man of the year. | Dalrock

Please see the comment policy linked from the top menu.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.