They mean no offense to the Red Guards by claiming their innocence.

Fox News has a story on four men who were accused of rape but had the charges dropped after video evidence contradicted the accusation.

Prosecutors dropped the charges against Poria Edalat, 30, Saman Edalat, 39, Sina Edalat, 34, and Ali Badkoobehi, 30, after the defendants presented the video to the district attorney’s office, KVVU-TV reported.

What struck me about the story was how careful the falsely accused men were to pay homage to the very hysteria they were caught up in.  Three of the men are brothers, and their statement included their pledge of loyalty to the real #MeToo movement:

At this sensitive moment in our history, we believe that women should be respected and heard and believed. But as this case shows, it is also important to keep a critical eye on those willing to use the (#MeToo) movement for their own selfish motives and remember that innocent until proven guilty is one of our country’s bedrock principles.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in #MeToo. Bookmark the permalink.

119 Responses to They mean no offense to the Red Guards by claiming their innocence.

  1. Pingback: They mean no offense to the Red Guards by claiming their innocence. | @the_arv

  2. TheWanderer says:

    Let no good crisis go to waste!

  3. earl says:

    At this sensitive moment in our history, we believe that women should be respected and heard and believed.

    Did we please you enough Madam Comrade?

  4. Gunner Q says:

    The only quote you need from the linked article: “An unnamed woman told security at the Wynn Las Vegas resort she was sexually assaulted in a suite while intoxicated.”

    I thought Vegas kept their whores on a tighter leash than this? Bad for “tourism”!

  5. earl says:

    “An unnamed woman told security at the Wynn Las Vegas resort she was sexually assaulted in a suite while intoxicated.”

    I doubt most women ever heard the story of the boy who cried wolf.

    Now men have to keep a detailed log of where they are lest they get falsely accused by a woman who was ‘sexually assaulted’ by a chad in the past or just fabricates a story for attention and wants to blame some other man.

  6. Anonymous Reader says:

    Dalrock
    What struck me about the story was how careful the falsely accused men were to pay homage to the very hysteria they were caught up in.

    They have state-issued licenses, I’m sure they want to keep them. In the sense of:

    “Nice little dental practice you have. Be a shame if something were to happen to it…”

    This is the place and time for the Traditional and Conservative people to protest how inherently good, kind and honest women are. Bonus points for T & C churchgoing people doing that. Or, hmm, just a quick NAWALT drive by , perhaps?

  7. The money line in that is “charges …were dropped after cellphone video showed the allegations were ‘completely fabricated’.”

    Expect more men to record their relations with women. It is the only protection to a woman turning on you days, years, or decades in the future.

    Also – no mention in the news of the woman’s arrest for perjury.

    Let’s’ hear guesses as to the number of arrests by Federal authorities for “perjury, contempt, and intimidation” in 2014 from the 86 thousand Federal criminal cases and countless Federal civil and agency cases. Clue: perjury is the safest of crimes to commit.

    Guessing, the safest crime for a woman to commit is a fake accusation of sexual assault (i.e., with the lowest odds of being convicted).

  8. Cane Caldo says:

    What struck me about the story was how careful the falsely accused men were to pay homage to the very hysteria they were caught up in.

    I suspect that the only video evidence which would exonerate the four of them is video evidence of her willing participation because you can’t prove a negative.

    If that is true, then we would expect that these four men are “enjoying the decline”, and thus actually support the byzantine rules of our days because four reasonably handsome dentists with foreign names are likely to have several opportunities in a slut-riddled society. The mantra reduces women’s fears and inhibitions so of course they parrot them…and keep a smartphone handy.

  9. Nick Mgtow says:

    ^^ Anonymous Reader, I don’t know how someone can put in jeopardy their lives like that! I mean, I used to work a very poorly qualified job more than a decade ago, yet, I never made any move toward a woman I was working with.

    One was so surprised that when she quit the job, she told me she was surprised I didn’t hit on her!

    I don’t understand how men of means -or any man by the way- can have an orgy with a complete stranger.

    Like some Mgtow I know used to say, ABR: Always Be Recording!

  10. earl says:

    One was so surprised that when she quit the job, she told me she was surprised I didn’t hit on her!

    If they were surprised back then…they are going to be REALLY surprised now.

    But since they hate and don’t need men…they shouldn’t be complaining that men aren’t going to be paying attention, helping, or going out of their way for them anymore.

  11. Brian K says:

    The MGTOWs are looking smarter and smarter by the day. I know we’re supposed to be fruitful and multiply, but any interaction with a woman puts a man in danger of being the latest victim of the pound me too mob. Makes a man want to leave them alone to play with their cats and their toxoplasmosis.

  12. ray says:

    Breitbart also carried this story, and commentary.

    Quite a changeroo for a magazine that was fully on-board with $MeToo from the outset. Which thing I do not let them forget.

  13. earl says:

    I know we’re supposed to be fruitful and multiply

    Woman are supposed to be the helpmate of man in the fruitfulness and multiplication. If they are helpful in contraception and division (the pill, divorce, false accusations)…then a man has to assess what’s going on.

  14. Anonymous Reader says:

    Larry
    The money line in that is “charges …were dropped after cellphone video showed the allegations were ‘completely fabricated’.”

    Expect more men to record their relations with women. It is the only protection to a woman turning on you days, years, or decades in the future.

    Some of the PUA’s are way ahead on this. It appears that 20-something girls are fond of taking “selfie vids” of their sexual experiences as well. Adds to the definition of “bodycam”.

    More prosaically, some cab drivers in certain cities are running with dashcams specifically to prevent false accusations from women passengers. It’s one way to get a free taxi ride, apparently.

    Also – no mention in the news of the woman’s arrest for perjury.

    Not surprising as there is no evidence of perjury.
    Knowingly filing a false report with police is a crime, but only a misdemeanor, so it is rarely prosecuted. Key word is “knowingly”, probably that intent is not so easy to prove at the court level.

    I am not a lawyer, this is not legal advice.

  15. Anonymous Reader says:

    Nick
    I don’t understand how men of means -or any man by the way- can have an orgy with a complete stranger.

    Well, just for a start: Las Vegas is not the typical US city.

  16. thedeti says:

    Expect more men to record their relations with women. It is the only protection to a woman turning on you days, years, or decades in the future.

    Others around here have been saying this for years.

  17. drifter says:

    Those mugshots now being out on the interwebz can’t be good for business either.

  18. Jonadab-the-Rechabite says:

    Ever since the concomitant forces of feminism and the sexual revolution have torn up the old social contract and old rules of interaction between the sexes, there has been no clear rules or standards for how men are to interact with women. A battle for power has ensued rather than a new understanding of what is right and what is wrong. The goalposts are constantly in motion. If society continues in this direction it will be wrong to be attractive male, but right for any woman to make false accusations because her feelz are real. In order to avoid being an unattractive male or a falsely accused male, many will make a preemptive move with white knight preening. “Conservatives” will white knight to signal their virtue while fragging those of us who claim that the biblical ethic not the social contract was and is the real standard by which to build a civilization and by which we will be judged. But of course that means the dreaded peace and sustainability of the Patriarchy.

  19. earl says:

    Others around here have been saying this for years.

    It was satire in the 90s.

    Start at 1:08.

  20. drifter says:

    “If society continues in this direction it will be wrong to be attractive male…”

    Ah, yes, I remember the good ol’ days.

  21. feministhater says:

    The #metoo movement has been a boon to MGTOW! May the #metoo movement grow from strength to strength! #TimesUp!

  22. Pingback: They mean no offense to the Red Guards by claiming their innocence. | Reaction Times

  23. Oscar says:

    @ Anonymous

    Or, hmm, just a quick NAWALT drive by , perhaps?

    Paging Jeff Strand…

  24. drifter says:

    So, are we not allowed to use href tags in the comments or something?

    [D: I’m not sure why Askimet flagged it. I just retrieved it from the spam bin (see above).]

  25. earl says:

    ‘Paging Jeff Strand…’

    Please…we don’t need his tales about how ‘alpha’ he was with all the ladies back in the day and then got the NAWALT of his dreams again. If he’s packed to the gills with cash he might want to get ready for his own #metoo accusation from one of those ladies ‘he made cry’. Sexual plaything of the past needs her financial security too.

  26. thecriticalg says:

    It’s always a “sensitive moment in our history” with these accursed people. Of course, it’s nothing of the sort, it’s just a useful noise that seems to work on the gullible and soft headed.

  27. BillyS says:

    And if you would be more manly like him you would have done better!

  28. PuffyJacket says:

    The worst part is how their names were dragged through the mud for nothing.

    Meanwhile, this slut will never be exposed for the POS that she is, as they don’t release the names of “victims”. Disgusting.

  29. OKRickety says:

    drifter,

    You can hyperlink like so: <a href=”https://dalrock.wordpress.com/”>HYPERLINK</a>    results
    in:   HYPERLINK

    There may be easier ways. However, I think more than two hyperlinks in a comment will put it into moderation until Dalrock lets it through.

  30. Robert What? says:

    Stockholm Syndrome.

  31. PuffyJacket says:

    A glimpse into how Republicans handled false sexual harassment allegations in the early 90’s:

    Fast forward to now, and they can’t even ask the accuser questions.

    Remember, the Kavanaugh accuser isn’t even sure about the *year* the assault occurred, let alone location. That sort of allegation should go directly into the trash bin. Yet, cuckservatives are fumbling arguably the most important supreme court nomination in US history over it.

  32. drifter says:

    @dalrock, OKR
    Tnx!

    Doesn’t look like you’ll be able to view it in the US (sans a vpn) anyway…too bad cuz it’s funny.

  33. gunner451 says:

    Sadly we live in a matriarchy now so the only thing that matters is that you validate women’s emotions even while being horribly abused by them. Witness what everyone has said about Dr. Ford even though her story is so full of holes it looks like swiss cheese and she said some obvious lies (afraid to fly but flies all over the world, put in a second door to “escape” but in reality is an unpermitted rental unit, etc.). They all say, “I believe she believes what she’s saying” or some such B.S. when reality is the opposite. Doing this is taken as an acknowledgement of that person is “right” in an emotional sense and for a female that is the same as an established fact is to a male. Cucks shoot themselves in the foot by trying to be nice when they should just come out and say the truth, by trying to appease the feminists/matriarchy they might as well have admitted the wrong they are being accused of.

  34. earl says:

    It’s not like false accusations to get rid of someone you don’t like wasn’t tried before.

    Jesus and the high priests comes to mind here.

  35. feeriker says:

    Meanwhile, this slut will never be exposed for the POS that she is, as they don’t release the names of “victims”. Disgusting.

    I don’t claim to be clairvoyant, but I can clearly see in the near future the rise of an army of “digital vigilantes” whose mission will be to doxx (and more) slutty, lying PoSes like the one in this story.

  36. drifter says:

    …the rise of an army of “digital vigilantes” whose mission will be to doxx (and more) slutty, lying PoSes like the one in this story.

    Why not? Sounds like a job for /pol and the anons.

  37. Minesweeper says:

    Don’t know if this has been mentioned before or is old news:

    “According to a recent study, 90% of all divorces are initiated by college-educated women. Why do women initiate divorce than men?”

    https://www.divorcemag.com/blog/why-do-women-initiate-divorce-more-than-men/

    This correlates with my experience. So turns out getting an educated chick is a really bad idea all those feminism classes about how beastly men are obviously affect them somehow. And they say women arn’t easily led. I mean it really is biblical – those who worm their way into womens houses and lead them astray. Incredible to see just how far it has gone.

  38. earl says:

    @Minesweeper…

    So it’s about her feelings and finding any fault in the man to blame him. That’s feminism to a tee.

  39. And Nabal before that, in Elijah’s time.

  40. Minesweeper says:

    Im pretty sure D has gone over this before, but it would be nice to work out how they got that stat of 90%, I can only find 79% (.79).

    According to here its found in this pdf.

    http://www.unc.edu/courses/2010fall/econ/586/001/Readings/Brinig.pdf

    https://www.themodernman.com/blog/are-college-educated-women-bad-wife-material.html

  41. ray says:

    J.J. Griffing — “And Nabal before that, in Elijah’s time.”

    And Ahab, in Elijah’s time. Who was merely a servant of Jezebel.

  42. Spike says:

    Why is it that the men, who have been declared innocent, are ALWAYS NAMED by the sensationalist Press even before a trial, but the LYING WOMAN, who has accused FALSELY, is never named?

  43. sipcode says:

    We are in the 1992 LA riot stage in our culture. Recall that in the first day of rioting only the thugs were looting. But as others saw lawlessness go on so long and so widespread, then some so-called good people in Dockers and shirts neatly tucked in could be seen climbing out windows with TVs, etc ahoist.

    Those ‘good’ women have been looting men for several years now. And law enforcement is nowhere in site.

  44. ranger says:

    as false accusations by women multiply, it is a good time to remind all Christians that Satan means “the accuser” and Paraclite (one of the titles of the Holy Spirit) means “attorney for the defense”.

  45. purge187 says:

    The mens’ names suggest that their ancestors were Middle Eastern. Why were they accused? I mean, it’s only cis White males who rape, right?

  46. Damn Crackers says:

    @purge187 – “The mens’ names suggest that their ancestors were Middle Eastern.”

    It’s interesting to see how immigrants or first or second generation descendants are some of the most SJW-cringe worthy politics too. It’s like the word has gone out, “Welcome to America. Learn to hate your hosts and you’ll be ok.”

  47. purge187 says:

    “I don’t claim to be clairvoyant, but I can clearly see in the near future the rise of an army of ‘digital vigilantes’ whose mission will be to doxx (and more) slutty, lying PoSes like the one in this story.”

    http://register-her.net/

    Gotta start somewhere.

  48. drifter says:

    Gotta start somewhere.

    Bookmarked.
    Also, hope they have that site backed up and contingency plans in place for when the bad-think police come to take it down.

  49. Gunner Q says:

    “It’s like the word has gone out, “Welcome to America. Learn to hate your hosts and you’ll be ok.””

    Gratitude undermines identity politics. Can’t have that.

  50. Darwinian Arminian says:

    @sipcode
    Those ‘good’ women have been looting men for several years now. And law enforcement is nowhere in site.

    That’s why it’s well past time that men started setting up their own brigades of Roof Koreans.

  51. drifter says:

    OT, but I had to…
    You know that AR otherwise has the coldest of ice in his veins, but how long before he caves on this one?

    btw, Dal, thanks for the fix up there.

  52. DR Smith says:

    Unless and until the proper white women in the proper suburbs decide that the continued false bashing of men by the #MeToo movement has run a muck, it will continue. Only they can stop it – question really is will they?

    My wife says they are starting to, as they are starting to get the picture of whom it is really hurting…their now young daughters and grand daughters whom will come of age in the next 5 to 10 years. her evidence is of conversations they have had re: the Kavanaugh mess…..they have real problems with woman claiming things happened 35 years ago that they cannot even provide basic facts around. They see it not only harming woman whom might have a legitimate issue, but also the future of their female children and grand children when it comes to relationships with men.

  53. earl says:

    Well I’m glad women are starting to see how the #metoo movement will hurt women. They sure as heck can’t see how much it is decimating men.

  54. Frank K says:

    Apparently it’s also hurting career women as men are now afraid of mentoring them, and let’s face it, other women won’t mentor then because they don’t want rivals.

    That they ridiculed VP Pence on his “never be alone” with a woman rule (IIRC, Billy Graham had a similar rule in his ministry) shows how they simply don’t think about the consequences of their policies.

  55. Frank K says:

    Also, hope they have that site backed up and contingency plans in place for when the bad-think police come to take it down.

    This is why I would NEVER use the so called cloud. You and your data are at their mercy. Forget that. Linux servers are cheap and tape backup can be stored off site, say in some empty paint cans in your garage.

  56. Minesweeper says:

    @Frank K says:”Apparently it’s also hurting career women as men are now afraid of mentoring them, and let’s face it, other women won’t mentor then because they don’t want rivals.

    That they ridiculed VP Pence on his “never be alone” with a woman rule (IIRC, Billy Graham had a similar rule in his ministry) shows how they simply don’t think about the consequences of their policies.”

    VP Pence now looks like a moderate position. now some guys wont even take a phone call without someone else on the line, refusing to even travel on public transport together – fly\taxi etc

  57. justdoit says:

    Off-topic but I think it may be of interest: Last week I was at the gym and I observed a 40s woman wearing one of those new “exercise skirt” contraptions (does anyone know a better name for them?) with what appears to be “integrated panties”. The woman seemed to make a point of spreading her legs widely while sitting/working on various exercise equipment and exercise mats, and generally seemed to make a point of trying to make men look up her “skirt” at her “panties”. I noticed that some did. Now, I don’t think she was being honest about wanting men to approach, nor wanting to give men any sort of real sexual satisfaction. It smelled like a pure feminine power-play, probably mixed with a desire to garner attention and/or collect ammunition to complain that men were ogling her.

    Has anyone else noticed the trend and this behavior with these “exercise skirts”? I think the idea behind them is that women know that men will respond more instinctively to a view up a skirt (wondering what they might see there, and because it seems more illicit) than a crotch view of 1980s leotards or the tight pud-packing “yoga pants” of the 2010s.

    I’m 100% sure the woman in question, as all woman generally do, knew what she was doing.

  58. Gunner Q says:

    “The woman seemed to make a point of spreading her legs widely while sitting/working on various exercise equipment and exercise mats, and generally seemed to make a point of trying to make men look up her “skirt” at her “panties”. I noticed that some did.”

    The typical gym attracts three kinds of women: the ones scouting for new boyfriends, the ones keeping her body hot & tight and the ones playing “you want me and can’t have me”. Sounds like you found the latter. They’re toxic.

    “Has anyone else noticed the trend and this behavior with these “exercise skirts”?”

    It’s called “throwing the cat”, displaying her pussy like a chimp in heat to get instant sexual attention. Borderline Personality Disorder is a good bet; she wasn’t ugly enough to be desperate. Ignore her like your life depends on it. Don’t be alone with her in the same room or she might get sexually aggressive and men can’t win that scenario.

    “I’m 100% sure the woman in question, as all woman generally do, knew what she was doing.”

    With clothing, absolutely and every time.

  59. earl says:

    Basically if she’s not acting modest with something blatant like that…she’s nuts.

    Women know exactly what they are doing when they wear clothes like that.

  60. Oscar says:

    I clicked on drifter’s link above, and saw the following article (from 2016) in the sidebar.

    https://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/08/women-beach-volleyball-bikinis-men-uniform-guidelines-kerri-walsh-jennings

    The answer, according to Corinne Calabro, the communications director for USA Volleyball, is pretty simple: Because that’s what the female athletes want to compete in. Women don’t have to wear bikinis — the uniform guidelines from the Federation of International Volleyball, the governing body of all international competition, allow for many different options.

    “The athletes are allowed to wear long sleeves, they’re allowed to wear shorts, tank tops,” Calabro said. “But we’ve gotten a lot of athletes on record saying they prefer to wear a two-piece because there are less places for sand to hide. They don’t view it as swim wear or anything like a fashion statement. For them, that’s their uniform.”

    Women’s need for plausible deniability is hilarious! No one believes them. Other women don’t believe them. Still, they can’t just say, “bikinis are sexier, and we like being sexy”.

    Oh no! It’s about sand, you see!

  61. ChristianCool says:

    This is a perfect example of when a man allows The Left to bully, imprison, and destroy them and then they apologize for it. 😡 They should be OUTRAGED, get lawyers and sue the false female accusers, the State, etc. But no…. they are so Betafied they cannot fight back.

    As I pointed out before @Ray is a colossal Blue-Pilled Beta, who enjoys (and likely laughs) at men who are falsely accused of crimes by an oppressive system designed to destroy men and imprison them falsely. (See Ray’s post about Kavanaugh “deserving” to be falsely accused because Kavanaugh coached his daughter’s basketball team and said “they are fierce girls”, to draw public support from center-left suburban white women, a key voting block – sadly). 🙄 Instead of showing solidarity to a man whose family, life, work, and reputation had been completely destroyed UNFAIRLY (which is obvious), people like Ray attack, mock, and jeer him. It is these types that embolden the left to continue to push their assault.

    It is people like THAT which enables the FemiNazi false criminal accusation machine to flourish. They never support other men being falsely accused, they mock them and jeer them. Or they simply apologize for being victims of a false criminal accusation by women.

    Until men take a Trump-style approach and FIGHT BACK HARD against our oppressors on the left, the media, education system, entertainment, and FemiNazis, there is 0 hope this mess will ever get fixed.

    Watch Trump in his speeches and rallies:

    “This is dangerous time for young men in America” – yesterday at White House lawn, before entering AirForce heli.

    Then he goes to Mississippi and mocks the “pure and holy” Dr. Christine Ford for her psychotically-insane rants and false accusations.

    THAT is how you fight back. 🙂

  62. ChristianCool says:

    @DR Smith

    The problem is that suburban white women (many with college degrees) are a “shaky demographic” politically. They used to be called “Soccer Moms” during the 1990s, a soft-Democratic voting block. They do not like their kids to have to compete or score in games, they are stay-at-home moms enjoying the financial boost of the Dot-Com Bubble.

    Then 9/11 happened, they became “security Moms”, a soft-Republican voting block. Then the NeoCons completely destroy GW Bush’s 2nd term, turning a bad situation into a catastrophe and these “Security Moms” shift to Obummer as “college moms for free everything”.

    Now these same white suburban women are enjoying another economy boost, created by the man they grudgingly voted for 2 years ago. With finances in order, they are shifting left again.

    Think about what they see 24/7: “war on women”; “women make less then man for same job”; “Trump is a womanizer”. Now “rape epidemic”, etc etc. It is pretty much all FAKE NEWS, but women believe everything they read and hear. They listen to their stupid “friends” on social media. It is going from one media-generated hysteria to another. And they eat that s#it up.

    They may actually believe America has more rapes per capita than warzones in the Central African Republic or Darfur… it is insane and illogical, but welcome to the entitled world of American white suburban women, especially ones with useless college degrees!!! 😮 They believe insane crap, like a 36 year-old rape accusation is valid because “all women must be lieved” or “women never ever ever ever lie about r@pe” or “she was so traumatized, she held it all these years and now it is back! Magic!”. 🙄

    Will these suburban white women come back and put an end to the MeToo hysteria, out of concern for their husbands, fathers, brothers, co-workers, cousins, sons, etc etc??

    Who knows?! They are extremely Flaky (pun intended). It will all depend on what Oprah, Ellen, or Kim Kardashian tells them to believe. We are dealing with a zombie army when it comes to Western women; they are brainwashed from day 1 to obey.

    Lower class white women are actually much more closer to reality than the entitled white suburban women. I live in a 98% white suburb, 6th wealthiest county in USA and I see these CuntMobiles (often Subarus) with Obummer and Hillary stickers in their brand-new cars their HUSBANDS are working late every night for.

    They are entitled as hell. It is hard to see them show any concern for anyone else…. Maybe if someone they personally know gets falsely accused, they will change their foolish ways. But short of that….??? *shrug*

    Hope springs eternal, I guess! 🙂

  63. purge187 says:

    “They may actually believe America has more rapes per capita than warzones in the Central African Republic or Darfur.”

    They beat you to it. I’m not sure which website published it – The Huffington Compost, probably – but there was an article about how America was the tenth most dangerous nation in the world for women, even ahead of several nations where the Religion of Pieces is the law of the land.

    As I’ve said before, there aren’t enough adjectives to describe how sick I am of Western women.

  64. feeriker says:

    Apparently it’s also hurting career women as men are now afraid of mentoring them,

    Good God, why would ANY man “mentor” a career woman? That would be like a Jewish chemist selling Zyklon B to the Nazis or a black merchant selling rope and gasoline to the Ku Klux Klan. You don’t “mentor” your enemies. DUHHHHHH…

  65. Minesweeper says:

    @feeriker says:”Good God, why would ANY man “mentor” a career woman? That would be like a Jewish chemist selling Zyklon B to the Nazis”

    one did, the inventor of it was Jewish would you believe,

    “Haber helped develop pesticide gases, which included a cyanide-based pesticide called Zyklon B, indeed one of his assistants was credited as the official inventor of Zyklon B”

    “Fritz Haber: Jewish chemist whose work led to Zyklon B.”
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-13015210

  66. Anonymous Reader says:

    Good God, why would ANY man “mentor” a career woman?

    Because his superior told him to.

  67. Minesweeper says:

    @ChristianCool says:”Then he goes to Mississippi and mocks the “pure and holy” Dr. Christine Ford for her psychotically-insane rants and false accusations.”

    God bless him 😀 !

  68. Oscar says:

    @ Anonymous Reader

    It’s a pretty effective way to destroy a country, and even a civilization.

    That’s a feature, not a bug.

  69. ChristianCool says:

    Here is a True Alpha in action in a rally in Mississippi speaking truth to power:

    NO FEAR of the FemiNazis. The Don mocked the much-greater-then-Christ-in-honesty, the holiest of holys, Dr. Christine Blaise Ford, the female Jesus Christ of the Left! 🙄 (their “male Jesus” is Obummer, of course)!. 🙄 lol

    ABOUT DAM TIME Trump said it! 🙂 We have had this charade long ’nuff! I have just had it with this whole farce.

    Ps. If I cross-examined this clown, 5 minutes she is done. Same with curly-top Swatnik, the scumbag represented by Michael Avenatti. What a sham.

  70. ChristianCool says:

    @Anonymous Reader says: “Good God, why would ANY man “mentor” a career woman? Because his superior told him to.”

    True…. but you can limit the damage, even if a supervisor/superior tells you to. Never ever teach a woman more than what you absolutely must in a workplace situation.
    Any man that “mentors” a female co-worker is asking for her to falsely accuse him of something, anything, in due time, so she can take over his job later. She will use whatever she learns against you.

    @ purge187

    I wonder if the level of lunacy has reached such a point in America that the FemiNazis actually BELIEVE America is more dangerous in terms of rapes than a Muslim-conflict warzone like Sudan, Darfur, or the Central African Republic. rape is indeed rampant in these warzones and used as weapon of intimidation, because Muslims feel free to kill, rape, and plunder anyone they want after these failed governments disarm the non-Muslim population, of course. -_-

    But then I see the FemiNazis defend Sweden as a safe, rape-free country and yet full of Muslims…. but since I have actually lived in Europe and I look at hard data, I realize these FemNuts are hypocrites. 😆

    (Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5195/sweden-rape )

    I have lived in 4 countries between opver 6 years period as a teenager (my Dad was officer at Consulate). I can say with 100% first-person knowledge that Brazil is infinitely more dangerous than the USA. I would rather be in Detroit with a sign saying “I hate N##gers” like in “Die Hard 3” movie than in Rio de Janeiro or Sao Paulo at night in a traffic light anywhere downtown at night. 😮 When I was last in Brazil, the Commando Vermelho (the “The Red Commandos” killing criminal cartel from Rio) and the Primeiro Comando da Capital (“The First Commandos from the Capital – from Sao Paulo) were in a contest to which would kill the most random civilians before the end of the year. Grenades in buses full of people, people burned alive on the street… we are talking over 200,000 killed by criminal cartels each year in Brazil, mostly shot dead. Oh and guns are 100% totally banned in Brazil, so that worked out well. 🙄

    When we went to la Isla Maragarita in Venezuela (pre-Chavez), we could not even go anywhere in Caracas due to danger and crime. We went from airport to transport to the island (think of

    Anyone thinks America is more dangerous than Mexico City?
    Or Tijuana?
    Or Bogota, Colombia?
    Or Sri Lanka?
    Or Burma?
    Or basically anywhere in Africa?
    How about Egypt, where Laura Logan got ganged on street on live TV?
    How about in Indonesia where these radicalized Muslism groups are now openly killing and assaulting women on streets in many cities?
    How about in Venezuela where the hero of the Left, Hugo Chavez destroyed the richest country in South America with Socialism and now the people are eating rats and killing each other over a box of band-aids?
    How about Iraq or Afghanistan where unmarried women walking alone are LEGALLY raped publicly and then stoned for “being prostitutes”?

    It is so preposterous and absurd to think America, even in south side of Chicago, is more dangerous than 70%+ of the world, there is not even a rational way to argue with women so indoctrinated, so full of lies, or simply insane. 🙄

    The FemiNazis need to get out of the country for a few days and see what life is REALLY like outside “safe spaces” and “cry rooms” and their Tweeter account. They will see what a real rape culture is.

  71. CSI says:

    Good points Christian Cool. It seems that most feminists claim to be sexual assault survivors. I’m sure that these ladies all had unpleasant things happen, but “sexual assault” in every case? It depends on your definition. And on that subject, I would take those rape statistics there from Sweden with a grain of salt. Sweden uses an extremely loose and expansive definition of “rape”. Most of those “rapes” would be committed by native-born non-Muslim Swedes.

  72. ChristianCool says:

    @CSI

    Thanks! 🙂 Yes, the very definition of “Sexual Assault” is also up for being either re-defined by activist Judges (all Marxists) or the Fems are waiting to get Pelosi and Schumer back in power in Leftist majorities again in Congress (or State level) and make a “sexual assault” to mean ANYTHING….

    Guy looks at a girl “too long”, that is a crime (sex assault). Flirt with a girl who refuses you? Crime! Guy taking a photo accidentally gets some woman in background? Crime! *There are no limits when you have a Leftist legislature and courts packed with leftist judges. *

    Just look at California and see what can be done legislatively to create a culture of male oppression, and a culture of fear. Judicial review is supposed to invalidate such un-Constitutional laws, BUT in California the courts are almost entirely controlled by Democrat judges. The State Legislature is over 85% Democrat. The Governor is a Bolshevik. The administartive agencies are unionized and run the legislature.

    This is why CA has a “Yes Means Yes” law in California, which defines ALL sex, even between consenting married couples as a “violent rape” IF the wife chooses to press charges. If she makes 1 phone call, the man is arrested, no evidence or questions are asked. The evidence of the crime is HER WORD since all sex = rapes. “Yes Means Yes” assumes rape in every situation. The courts in CA are reviewing this, but I doubt these laws will be struck by Courts, since Dems control entire State top to bottom.

    The extreme-left is celebrating this corruption of justice at Vox: https://www.vox.com/2014/10/13/6966847/yes-means-yes-is-a-terrible-bill-and-i-completely-support-it

    (Why anyone sane is still in California is beyond me anyway). -_-

    Oh but these are reported rapes in Sweden are actually “penetration rapes”. There is a worksheet on the website you can check out. And yes, Scandinavia is a Feminist hellhole. The Swedish women OVERWHELMINGLY voted Socialist to keep borders open to all Muslim “refugees” and unlimited African migrants from Muslim countries. Same in Germany. I have 0 sympathy for these b!tches, they asked for this hell, they need to put up with it now. They just had election in Sweden last month and the pro-rape (open borders to all Muslims) Socialist party took 1st again! 🙄 These people are hopeless.

    Last time my dad was in Copenhagen (Denmark) about 3 or 4 years ago, he was stunned how fat the women had become, how much graffiti was everywhere and foreigner gangs were running all around town. And my Dad is Dutch, he is used to leftist stupidity like this and urban decay caused by immigration, but he was still shocked to see how bad Denmark is today due to open borders. It is a preview of Sweden (and every country with open borders) in a few years.

    One final point: Besides attention, why would a woman want to say she was raped (when false) to a boyfriend or whatever? Sympathy? Insanity? The mentality and the level of insanity baffles me! 😮

  73. ranger says:

    One final point: Besides attention, why would a woman want to say she was raped (when false) to a boyfriend or whatever? Sympathy? Insanity? The mentality and the level of insanity baffles me!

    Revenge. Some people, from both sexes, are motivated by it. A vengeful man might beat up a woman for a perceived wrong, a vengeful woman cant do that so she makes lies about him instead.

    Society, correctly, strongly condemns the former. But its encouragement of the latter by praising women for their bravery only means we will get more and more of it.

  74. Gunner Q says:

    ChristianCool @ 4:43 am:
    “(Why anyone sane is still in California is beyond me anyway).”

    If your women vote then you’re next. We are your future.

  75. feeriker says:

    I wonder if the level of lunacy has reached such a point in America that the FemiNazis actually BELIEVE America is more dangerous in terms of rapes than a Muslim-conflict warzone like Sudan, Darfur, or the Central African Republic.

    Of course they actually believe it. The modern female’s capacity for self-delusion knows no limits.

    Once again, I will go on record here as saying that women who throw the word “rape” around with complete and reckless abandon deserve to be marooned in one of those shit hole countries ChristianCool mentioned so that they can get a taste (or better yet, LOTS of tastes) of the real thing. I don’t expect that it would ultimately make any difference with most of them (that whole “cause and effect” thing), but it might light a spark in some of the less dense among them.

  76. ChristianCool says:

    @ranger

    Oh I get that women falsely accuse men for revenge. Revenge is actually the #1 reason, money being a close 2nd.

    I personally know of 2 confirmed instances when women made false criminal accusations during my 6-year legal career. They “confessed” while being secretly taped of falsely accusing our client (a man) of false rape. But in FL that is inadmissible (2-party consent State), but the goal was to create a record and try to appeal it later if we lost the case. Also to poison the judge against the false female accuser and let the Prosecutor know that it is false accusation and see if the prosecutor would be willing to dismiss the charge (and in that case, he did).

    One issue is that the Prosecutor holds ALL the cards in the criminal game, I kid you not. 😮

    What I do not understand is why women go tell the next guy in their life they were raped or whatnot. Must be for pure sympathy or to justify their insane behavior.

    The other problem, as you pint out, Range, is that women do not get prosecuted for making false police reports nearly enough. They also almost never get sued in civil court for that either. The incentive to falsely accuse is all there, almost no risk.

    @Gunner Q

    “Our women vote”? What do you mean by that? Female voting rights will not go away unless a Constitutional Amendment is put into place. That is almost impossible in this day and age and everyone here knows it.

    Who is “we are the future”?

    I do not oppose women voting per se. I do oppose ANYONE voting that does not know even the basics of our legal, economic, and governing system to vote. Yes, that would eliminate about 80% of current registered voters, but people who are clueless to an extreme should not be voting.

    I think the point everyone is missing here is that this “guilt by accusation” where women are always believed and men are always viewed as liars is extremely dangerous and will end in violence against women (which is wrong, I do not condone it, btw).

    But if you think about it, it is inevitable. If a man knows with almost 100% certainty that he is going to do 50 years in prison on a false rape accusation on a zero evidence, “he said, she said” case, what is he gonna do before trial? Run away? Or kill the false female accuser and get his revenge anyway! Why not? He is going to prison to die there anyway, since he is guaranteed guilty verdict due to “women are always believed” and “men always lie”. Might as well take revenge on the lying woman up front.

    That is my concern!

  77. ray says:

    ChristainCool == See you down the road, coward.

  78. ChrustianCool says:

    LOL… is that a threat? Cause I am reeeeeeaaaaaaly scared. 😆

    I am generally terrified of Betas. lol Been like that my whole life… sure. 🙄

    As Senator Orrin Hatch said to a FemiNazi harassing him on his way to a vote “grow up!”.

    Bye bye Feminist Beta!

  79. Anonymous Reader said: “Not surprising as there is no evidence of perjury. …Knowingly filing a false report with police is a crime, but only a misdemeanor, ”

    I just saw this comment. It’s an important point, and obviously not well understood.

    (1) “Perjury” in the vernacular sense refers to three crimes under Federal law: lying under oath (traditional perjury), False Declarations before grand jury or court (18 U.S. Code § 1623), and False Statements to a Federal official (18 U.S. Code § 1001). When speaking to the public, Federal prosecutors often refer to all of these as perjury. For example, in 2005 they charged Lewis “Scooter” Libby with False Declarations, but called it perjury in their press releases.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1623

    (2) The likely crime in the Kavanaugh investigations is False Statements. This is a serious crime under Federal law: the guilty party “shall be fined under this title {up to $250,000}, imprisoned not more than 5 years …”

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1001

    (3) The federal government generally considers a crime punishable with incarceration for one year or less to be a misdemeanor. All other crimes are considered felonies. So all three of these are felonies.

    (4) Off-topic, but the situation created by these laws (plus the vague law about “obstruction”) – and prosecutors almost unlimited discretion in their use, is quite mad. Here’s a good analysis:

    http://www.professorbainbridge.com/professorbainbridgecom/2017/10/its-back-george-papadopoulos-robert-mueller-and-18-usc-1001.html

  80. Gunner Q says:

    ChristianCool October 4, 2018 at 11:38 am:
    ““Our women vote”? What do you mean by that? Female voting rights will not go away unless a Constitutional Amendment is put into place. That is almost impossible in this day and age and everyone here knows it.”

    Exactly. Californians are no different than people in flyover land. My state was solidly conservative up until the 1980s, at which point the women voted in witches and pedophiles and eco-Nazis with licenses to run up endless debt in the taxpayers’ names.

    Once your area gets a critical mass of unmarried women, no matter where you live, you’ll be Californicated. It isn’t something the Pacific Ocean does to people. It isn’t something you can prevent by building a wall on the west side of Nevada. Our degeneracy is the natural, uninhibited state of female nature.

    You cannot hate us today without hating yourself tomorrow. We are you and by your own admission, you cannot stop the process.

    “Who is “we are the future”?”

    California is the Trendsetter State. It’s the most influential state in the Union for many reasons. We’re 25% of America’s entire economy in addition to things like Silicon Valley and our ports bringing in all that “Made In China” junk.

    Do you know why your schoolkid’s textbooks are sodomized? Because Sacramento decreed that only such books could be purchased. Publishers didn’t want to be frozen out of the California market, no other state makes a principled stand against sodomy and it’s expensive to produce two products that compete against each other. Ditto your car having so many “safety features” that it’s become your other nagging wife.

    And your voting-age women! They fantasize about Hollywood and Beverly Hills and San Fran trust fund boys. They can’t get enough of our beaches and nightlife. We produce more culture per capita, nationally and internationally, than anywhere between Milan and Bollywood. It’s now dogshit culture but you flyover people continue purchasing it.

    “I do not oppose women voting per se.”

    If you see no problem with allowing the servant to oppose her master then I can’t help you.

    ” If a man knows with almost 100% certainty that he is going to do 50 years in prison on a false rape accusation on a zero evidence, “he said, she said” case, what is he gonna do before trial? Run away? Or kill the false female accuser and get his revenge anyway! Why not?”

    Men are already not doing that except in rare cases. Those rare cases have not changed the tide of false accusations. Do you know what this world calls an unsexy man who demands his humanity at gunpoint? A creep.

    But to answer your question of why not: God prohibits taking your own revenge, fathers don’t want to orphan their kids, a live dog has more hope than a dead lion and husbands are simply not as black-hearted selfish as wives. It’s our wiring.

  81. earl says:

    I do not oppose women voting per se.

    I do. How much more evidence do you need to see the downfall because of it?

    Even the women back in the day knew what would happen…this was from the Southern Woman’s League.

  82. ChristianCool says:

    @Earl

    I do not think women voting is a positive for our society, BUT I also understand the reality of the situation: short of a massive national crisis (i.e. foreign invasion), or a world war/major regional conflict that destroys most of our country, or a massive plague, it is virtually impossible to reverse the 19th Amendment, just as it is virtually impossible to repeal the 2nd or the 1st today. The country is too polarized and divided to get a 2/3 majority of anything, much less of the State Lagislatures and the Congress to agree on anything.

    The early 20th Century progressives were evil manipulators. They KNEW once they got the 19th in and changed the Senate from representing the State Legislatures to “popular vote”, it would never change and would harm the country permanently.

    Keep in mind women HAVE been voting since the 1770s… in Jersey “all adult inhabitants” of the State who owned a specified amount of property COULD VOTE, including women. Jersey laws enacted in 1790 and 1797 referred to voters as “he or she”, and women regularly voted. By the end of the 19th Century (post Civil war), Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming already passed laws allowing women to vote and Colorado passed a Statewide referendum allowing women to vote in 1893.

    The issue to me at least is not so much women voting per se; the issue is HOW THEY VOTE.

    When women voted in the 1920s and in the 1950s, did that make America a horrible place where men were systematically oppressed by the courts (especially family and criminal courts), hired less for jobs, or rejected for college applications because they were men? Were men falsely accused, by the tens of thousands, of false crimes and/or falsely of sexual harassment? Surely not.

    This hell we have today began in the 1960s with the Feminist movements. The selfish and spoiled Boomers gave us this mess via Feminism, not necessarily by voting.
    It was the Left’s systemic destruction of the family, the radicalization of women through “education”, and the left’s overwhelming control of media, entertainment, and education that created this mess.

    Look, I enjoy the discussions of even absurd topics, like polygamy, but they are indeed purely theoretical discussions “for fun” as that will never happen, except if we have a national crisis as explained above where we have a brand new system of govt put in place or have a situation where Constitution could be re-written from scratch. Short of that. there is no political or social will today to make the changes necessary to restore America to a pre-19th amendment or even to fix the mess of the 17th Amendment (Senate elected by popular vote). We lack the leadership in Congress or in the States to do such a thing today.

    Heck, we cannot even do something as basic as funding the much-needed Border Wall or enforce our own laws regarding Immigration, a much, much more serious threat than women voting. 😮 You legalize the current 22-30 million illegal immigrants in this country and Texas, Utah, and even Wyoming become “battleground States” almost instantaneously. Chuck Schummer and Nancy Pelosi will seem moderate compared to the type of Leftists that will be elected to rule this country forever.

    I think the fix here is to change HOW women vote rather than try to repeal the 19th Amendment, which is clearly impossible to do. And getting rid of the 22+ million illegals, a 90%+ welfare-loving, guaranteed Democrat voting block is much more critical than trying to repeal the 19th.

    Just being realistic here, folks.

  83. ChristianCool says:

    @ Gunner Q

    I agree with you and I have to disagree in some ways. Allow me to explain.

    Californians today are rabidly left, except for the rural parts of the State. Why, specifically, in the cities and coastal areas, are Californians so rabidly left? Leftist-run “public education” is probably 80% of the reason and living in an urban environment is another big part of it. Thomas Jefferson said correctly that “if we pile upon one another as they do in the cities of Europe, we shall become as corrupted as Europe”. Urbanized environment disconnects a human being from nature, from peace, and from God. It is easy to see someone living in a chaotic urban hell like LA or NYC to feel disconnected from God. It is a depressing environment, overcrowded, and lacking in silence and/or peace.

    Maybe it is the masses of unmarried women that transformed CA into the raging shithole it is today. But more likely than not, it is the MASS IMMIGRATION that has completely changed the State that is at fault here. Did you know the population in CA is

    Think about this: at one point, as late as the late 1980s, suburban white women overwhelmingly voted Republican, even single ones. Christians were overwhelmingly a Conservative voting block. Look at the situation today? The “spoiled class” as I call ” suburban white women” of today and many false Christians vote Democrat. WHY?

    The shift in voting is not because they are women or because they are Christian. It is because The Left has corrupted churches and our culture and women, married or not, are subject to “group think” and collectivist thinking. Sin ce the left controls almost all of entertainment, media, and education, it is easy to see how women shifted politically due to the influences around them.

    Trust me, when too many people from CA move into an area in CO or NV, the area goes to s#it right away. But we CAN stop the Californiazation of the rest of America by allowing CA to “CalExit”. In fact, I fully support that, even if I know it will be painful for the USA as a whole. But the benefits of CalExit outweigh the costs of CalExit. We would lose millions of illegals, we would lose Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, all of Hollywood elites, Maxine Waters, and of course 55 electoral college votes. 🙂

    BTW, California is no longer America’s trendsetter. The State is so hated everywhere else and viewed as “a bunch of idiots” that no one cares what you guys do anymore. If CA was still the trendsetter, than the rest of America would have virtually banned all guns, concealed carry would be gone, illegals would vote, Obamacare for illegals would be in place, “yes Means Yes” laws would be here, forced installation of sprinklers in existing residential homes would be required, $5 gas (due to taxes), carbon taxes on cars, and much more. Not the case! 🙂 You need to come visit the USA sometime, we DESPISE California here, even former CA conservatives who escaped hate your State.

    Oh the textbooks are now more shifted towards Texas curriculums than CA.

    Well, men are not YET getting violent when falsely accused by women because many men foolishly believe in “fair justice” in “he said, she case” false accusation cases. Have you been to RoK lately (even if sad since RoK is going on hiatus soon)? There are thousands of men who are hearing the message and know what is going on now.

    Being called “a creep” will become irrelevant when he knows he is guaranteed prison for life on a he said, she said false charge. Even the Soviet Union and Revolutionary France learned this lesson in time. You run out of French guillotines and gulags in Siberia in time or the threat opf such make people numb.

    Did you see the guy in CO who murdered his wife and 2 daughters? Truly evil. I despise that guy. But I can almost bet that she was pregnant with another man’s kid and/or threatened to make false accusations as she was about to file for divorce so she could steal his house and keep his kids away from him.

    How about that Smyrna GA marine who killed his mudshark GF, as she hid their newborn into the toilet as the husband came in to kill her? The “he snapped” or “he had PTSD” or “he was depressed” media theories does not wash if you understand even the basics of human behavior and male rationality. She was taking the dude’s kid away and knowing how women operate, she probably threatened to have him arrested on false charges and ruin his beloved military career so he would never see his kid again-type thing. Then the guy probably really snapped and he rather kill and commit suicide than face that.

    I worked in a few other cases where men “demanded his humanity at gunpoint”, as you say, because they saw no way out of a corrupt legal system set to destroy these guys. I worked in several illegal alien cases where the man, when pushed by their abusive immigrant women to the limit (who became feminists living here) cannot take it anymore and get violent. One case I can think of right now is how the “victim” wife started hitting the Mexican dude on the head after he “arrived home late from work” and he could not take it anymore and locked woman in shoe-closet and barricaded the closet door and she was the victim.

    The natural invisible hand of the free market will resolve this problem between men and women in time anyway, just as men are avoiding marriage 70% to 30% due to disincentives to marry (the 70% of bachelors number will grow exponentially in the future, I hope!). Same with dating, Millennial men have no reason to date or put any effort for women, due to distractions, hook-up culture, and the lack of quality women. The incentives are not there anymore.

    If you look at the trends, women are being raised to be more violent and men are being medicated and/or trained to be more beta (by social engineering design, mainly done through social media and schools). But you can only hit a dog so many times and push it into a corner over and over again. Suddenly, it will bite you. This is the innate reality of male human nature. This will likely be the trend for men as this country continues to become more socially unstable and more violent.

  84. ChristianCool says:

    @ Larry Kumer

    In a FEW States, filing a false police report (i.e. false rape accusation, for instance) is a felony. Most States, it is a misdemeanor. And when WOMEN file the false criminal accusations, especially sexual in nature, even when discovered to be totally false, the woman is still referred to as “the victim”. Even when women get caught by cops making false police report, when arrested and charged by police, the Prosecutors almost never give the women any jail time for the crime. They offer a plea for 10 hours of community service and an innocuous “nolo contendere” (No Contest) plea for “disorderly conduct” type charge and off they go back to their lives, unmolested and unpunished.

    In criminal law and our “justice system”, Prosecutors hold all the cards. I mean 99% of a criminal case is set, controlled, and run by the Prosecutors. If you are into the legal subject, I can recommend a book that explains this problem in “common terms” for non-legal field individuals.

    “Mistrial: An Inside Look at How the Criminal Justice System Works…and Sometimes Doesn’t” by Mark Geragos (yep, that guy!!). My Mom is in medical field and she wanted to understand my work in legal field and read that book and said it was awesome.

    Geragos explains in simple terms the entire issue with prosecutors and how they have almost absolute power in criminal cases. prosecutors can refuse to charge someone, dismiss all charges for any reason at any time, charge someone who they know are innocent, put charges into an Arraignment pleading or Information that defendant was never arrested for (in order to force them to take pleas for crimes they did not comit), and much more. I have seen it all and in my law school, this topic is covered fairly and openly, in explicit terms and details. Criminal Prosecutors have almost as much power as family court judges, and it is largely unchecked and almost unrestrained.

    Think that nutbag Swetnik represented by “lawyer” Michael Avenatti or that Ramirez, both who clearly made false sworn statements under penalty of felony perjury against Kavanaugh will ever be charged? 🙄 Think they will do any time, even IF they were charged? I doubt it and here is 6 long years in legal field + law school here talkin’.

    The problem is that women have carte blanche in America to commit crimes and not be prosecuted for such crimes. In the rare instances they are prosecuted, they get 1/3 of the time men do, and often they get to plea tio minor offenses and get probation. Andrea Yates (drowns 5 little kids)… Lorena Bobbitt (husband’s penis-cutter), Mary Carol Winkler (executes her TN pastor husband with shotgun while he slept)…. thousands of female teachers who have sex with boys as young as 10. Do any of them get real prison time? No, they get send for mental evals or get slap on the wrist, if that.

    Prosecutors are responsible for women not being sentenced or even prosecuted for major crimes. Prosecutors are lawyers and I would estimate safely that around 90% (if not more) of lawyers are Leftists.

    That is why women make false police reports of rape almost on a daily basis. It is a national sport. They face zero consequences for their lies and crimes.

  85. Anonymous Reader says:

    ChristianCool
    In a FEW States, filing a false police report (i.e. false rape accusation, for instance) is a felony.

    Please provide references. Name these states. If possible, point to statutes as well.

  86. ray says:

    ChristianFool — You got no reason to be here except to bait me, feeling safe in your anonymity. You’re about as Christian as that skank Teddie Beale. You’re about as much of a man as he is, too.

    Looking forward to meeting you both. Soon.

  87. Gunner Q says:

    ChristianCool @ 6:01 am:
    “Californians today are rabidly left, except for the rural parts of the State.”

    Not so. I’ve documented multiple cities and COUNTIES opposing illegal immigration on my blog. Most notably San Diego. I just profiled John Moorlach, a conservative state senator with workable solutions to our pension crisis and a personality comparable to Brett Kavanaugh. “We aren’t in control” is not “we don’t exist”.

    “Why, specifically, in the cities and coastal areas, are Californians so rabidly left?”

    https://gunnerq.com/2017/10/26/why-cities-are-leftist-cesspits/

    https://gunnerq.com/2018/04/02/it-was-something-in-the-water/

    Notice the reasons are not California-specific. Dude, I have a lifetime, front-row seat to the freak show and I’m telling you, as a primary witness, Leftism is normal, hardwired, universal human behavior. Leftism is our default setting, not Christianity. Christianity is abnormal, artificial behavior that must be applied with great force, internally and externally, to curb humanity’s native instincts.

    Original Sin. Look it up.

  88. ChristianCool says:

    @Ray

    OMG, you read me like a book! You got me all figured out! You are the sole reason for my entire existence. You are the air that I breathe and the essence of my being. 🙂 I cannot live without you.

    Yes, let’s meet in person, as you suggested above. I cannot wait to have your beautiful flabby Beta arms and your large OctoMom stomach against my 4-pack and my hard chest that can bench a clean 220lbs incline. 😆

    Ps. I love you, man. Marry me! 😆

    Chris

    (Can we please move on, Ray? This is boring.). 🙄

    —-

    @Anonymous Reader

    I will get my criminal law book for you from locker on Monday night and list the States.

    Understand that a police report is often filed by a citizen “under oath”, because the cops often rely on that to arrest and/or file a “Charging Affidavit” (in Florida, for instance), which is the arresting report and the referral of a case to prosecutors for further prosecution or dismissal. The Charging Affidavit is filed “under oath” by Arresting Officer or Detective. A Search Warrant, however, is filed under penalty of Perjury because it is filed with the Court of jurisdiction. The Affiant (the cop/detective/prosecutor) requesting the Search Warrant makes a sworn statement to the court to obtain the search warrant. A lie on a Search Warrant is a felony (again, I am referencing FL here) because it is an application with the Court to violate the basic civil rights of a citizen by searching his residence, for instance. It is a lawful, Constitutional process, BUT if the Warrant was obtained by false means, it is a serious violation of a citizen’s civil right protections (and often opens law enforcement up for civil lawsuits; even in States with “Sovereign Immunity” laws – which is State and its agents are protected from civil lawsuits).

    To put it in current events, when Rod Rosenstein and Comey’s cronies filed the fraudulent FISA warrant to spy on Trump campaign, they mislead the FISA court (which Constitutionally, should never exist), but they lied to the Court and obscured facts. Carter Page, the target of the said Warrant, had his civil rights violated and he is seeking civil action against the DOJ and other institutions for redress.

    One way men can fight back against false criminal accusations is using the Civil Courts. Men who are falsely accused of a crime can sue the female accuser for a number of things, including slander, libel, defamation of character, the loss of his employment (if happened), the costs he incurred from criminal defense lawyers, time lost from work, and more. If the man is divorced and wife used criminal accusations (stemming from another woman, not wife) as an excuse to prevent him from seeing his kids, for intentional infliction of emotional distress of the man, including mental anguish of chiuldren, etc. It all has to be substantiated, so going to seek counseling (therapist, for instance, which will make a written record of it) can aid in such civil litigation.

    I am speaking from memory here, but when we did Family Law II, the professor said in some States, men with the means to hire counsel (attorney) will use women who cause them emotional distress and mental anguish from divorce proceedings. In other States, the laws prevent such civil remedies, as the Family Law courts have god-like jurisdiction of all matters related to the couple and its children and assets.

    One reason I am even going to law school at my old age (36) is because I want to run a “Weekend men’s right firm” on the side form my regular job and sue women who falsely accuse men of crimes and if possible, civil legation for suffering caused by divorce proceedings, withholding of children, etc. The reason most men do NOT sue in civil court is they lack the funds to pay a lawyer’s Retainer Fee and “replenish” the retainer when the funds are used up by lawyer for case costs and work performed.

    My goal is to do these case son Contingency fee basis, which is unheard of today. The odds of me recovering any funds even by winning such cases are low, because women, especially divorced ones, frivolously spend all their money stolen form men in divorces. But that is what I want to do to fight back against this hellish matriarchal legal system we have in the USA today.

  89. ChristianCool says:

    @Gunner Q

    The Californian “transplants” I meet here in the USA from time to time, who self-describe themselves as politically Conservative are often fiscal and national security conservatives only. They are Socially leftist like Nancy Pelosi, for instance.
    You cannot deny that CA State Assembly is like 85% Democrat and these are not “Blue Dogs”. These are Marxist radicals, Berkley and San Francisco-style radicals. The guy almost certain to be CA’s next Gov, Gavin Newsome (D-SF) is running on completely open border, taxpayer funded “universal healthcare” for all illegal aliens, zero criminal liability for illegal alien felons, drug needles for all, and Statewide voting rights for illegals. Newsome is beating moderate Republican candidate by 29 points in the SurveyUSA poll back in July and by 12 points in PPIC poll Sept 9. They are stop polling since Newsome will almost certainly win by double digits. Newsome is vowing to defy Supreme Court decisions now in the new 5-4 majority. What is the USA gonna do, if CA decides to defy all federal laws, including Supreme Court decisions?

    The majority of people in CA WANT this nightmare. They want illegal aliens and crackheads financed by taxpayers. They want high taxes. They want global warming initiatives or $5 gasoline. The Bolsheviks ARE the majority and it is due to mass immigration, the single women voters are just the icing in the cake. The white middle class that elected Reagan has long left, the State is 25% under national poverty line. It is a welfare State where about 40 billionaires pay 1/2 State’s income taxes; they leave, it collapses, like Detroit.

    And I do NOT agree at all that Leftism is a natural human tendency. Leftism is a totalitarian, repressive ideology. While I agree human beings are naturally born into sin and predisposed to evil, human beings are also creatures that love and seek freedom and individual identities as people. Leftism is imposed by FORCE, and that is why all Leftist countries rely on brute force to remain in power. Human nature seeks freedom by nature, but also seek to do evil to others as well. Paul calls it “the sinful nature”, the antithesis of The Spirit given to us by God.

    I agree that Christianity seeks to modify human behavior and essentially is a counter-force to our sinful nature. Paul says in Romans 7:15-20: “I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. For I know that good itself does not dwell in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. For I do not do the good I want to do, but the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing. Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it.”

    Our sinful nature is at constant war against The Spirit. Think of as two dogs facing each other, in a constant struggle for control. The black dog representing the sinful nature and a white dog representing The Spirit. Based on our decisions, we “feed and strengthen” one of the dogs over another, so the more of a certain path we follow, the stronger that “dog” becomes. In time, if you give in to the sinful nature that often, it becomes stronger and you become more and more inclined to do what is evil. Only through watchfulness, prayer, and clear self-assessments can a man stay in the path of God and strengthen his “white dog” so it is able to overpower the “black dog” more often. I use this allegory because it makes the struggle between the Spirit and sinful nature more visual. Regardless, I am sure you get my point. 😉

    BUT!!! Christianity CANNOT be imposed by force, like Islam. Christianity requires an internal conversion of oneself, a DESIRE to change and do what is right and what is pleasing to God. It cannot be imposed or faked, for God knows a man’s intentions and thoughts. To become a Christian is to CHOOSE this new path, to resist our worst urges and seek the path of righteous and of God. It cannot be imposed.

    As John Adams stated best “if men [humans] were angels, there would be no need for government… or laws”. But such government should be limited and its scope and power, so that human freedom can prosper. The 10th Amendment of the Constitution states that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

    This means, that the Constitution should be construed to limit individual freedom as little as possible.

    Finally, I want to say that because you do indeed have a “lifetime, front-row seat to the freak show” we call California, you have a much less positive view of life and humanity as a whole. Not that I am Mr. Sunshine when it comes to human nature; I have seen enough death, poverty, despair, and the worst stuff imaginable living outside America 6 long years (without once coming back during that whole time).

    I really feel bad that pretty much everyone in CA missed out on so much of the good we have here in America. I doubt that most (if not everyone) in CA who grew up in my generation and was in high school in the mid-to-late 1990s and experienced what it was like to meet clean, sane, slender, feminine girls in school. What it was like to go on dates, to make love to a woman when you were both virgins, not to worry about being falsely accused of crimes, to have your GF make you a cookie bag and for you to take her out Friday night for movie. California is a deplorable place; my Mom lived in Bakersfield and Fresno almost 2 years while working for USDA and I am shocked she did not become depressed and suicidal being there. She would tell me almost every week show desperate she was to find a job outside CA but that was in 2010, the Obamination era of recession and financial pain. I was depressing helping her move there (we drove across country). CA is so messed up, I put it at the same level as Brazil when it comes to crap-status. It is hot, polluted (in San Joaquin valley, it felt like I was going to develop asthma just driving through it), people are angry, traffic is horrible, women are morbidly obese, people are covered in tattoos, there is graffiti and trash everywhere and bums everywhere. The smell was horrible. It was disgusting, not even in Rio or Sao Paulo did I see so many bums on street smoking crack or women so disgustingly fat and nasty. I was in CA for a whole 4 days, not once did I see one hot girl, all landwhales or freaks. It is a real life shitshow, as Charlie LeDuff calls it.

    In sum, Leftism is totalitarianism and can only be imposed by brute force. Venezuela, Soviet Union, China, Cuba…. all require mass killings and gulags to operate, because human nature seeks freedom, not submission to totalitarianism. Christianity cannot be imposed by force; it is a voluntary conversion. California is Hell, I am glad I donated to CalExit movement, I hope we get rid of that place, it is beyond saving. You guys who love America can get out, we will ship some of our illegals there and build the Border Wall facing CA too. Cancel citizenship for everyone who “Esists”. UK is Brexiting, the Marxcists that run the State can leave too. We will trade as needed, but good-bye Maxine, Pelosi, and 55 Electoral Votes. Let’s have a restore America… Short of a military occupation to purge out the Commies and deport ALL illegals, CA is beyond saving, I am sorry to say.

  90. ChristianCool says:

    Italian model and Conservative speaker Fabio on California becoming hell on earth:


    (He calls CA “Sodom and Gomorrah”, and the “wild wild west” and he said 30 years ago, Africa was safer and cleaner than CA today.)

    British investigative report Katie Hopkins went to Skid Row right next to downtown LA. She has been to hellholes from Mumbai to Pakistan…. she has never seen a place so disgusting, dangerous, and depressing as downtown LA.

    Time for CA to go. CalExit now. It is too late to save that place. Let’s restore and save what is left of America and let that Marxist foreign country go to its own demise. The patriots can come here, we will work compensation rights, 100 year lease for our military bases there, and close up shop. Time to cut our losses and for CA and its trillions in debt to go.

  91. BillyS says:

    Ray,

    You have to get your attack in against VoxDay, even though he has nothing to do with CC. I don’t much care for CC’s fakeness, but you are equally fake. Who are you a sock puppet for? I would say Scalsi, but I doubt he could stay undercover here.

    Keep throwing those rocks so others can see how idiotic you are!

  92. Opus says:

    I have been following with interest the process leading to the appointment to your Supreme Court (a building with which I am not unfamiliar – great cafeteria) of Mr Justice Kavanaugh. I never comment on American politics partly because I am not American and partly because I clearly do not understand your system and I have no intention now of altering my behaviour in that regard however so that you might see how strange your system appears to the British you may find the following two observations of interest:

    The British not having a written constitution (even though we have provided no less than fifty of the things to various states around the planet) there is no document for to be examined and determined as to its meaning. America seems to spend as much effort determining what its constitution means as it does The Bible. This is an entirely American phenomena.

    In England, should you wish to be appointed to the highest court in the land what you need to do is to be admitted to the Bar. That’s it. Should the Judiciary be sufficiently impressed with you then one day whilst eating your breakfast a letter from The Lord Chancellor’s office will arrive and opening the same you will see that you have been invited to become a High Court Judge: you cannot apply. Should you prove sufficiently successful as such you will be appointed to the Court of Appeal and then again you may thereafter be ennobled which will enable you to sit in the countries highest court. There is one other way:

    Consider the late Quintin Hogg who was a member of the Bar but also an elected M.P. who held various high offices of state. The then Prime Minister asked him to become the Lord Chancellor and so duly ennobled and having forgone his seat in the House of Commons he felt it appropriate and not withstanding that he had no experience as a member of the Judiciary to sit with and as part of the House of Lords in its Judicial Capacity. I have never heard it said his judgements were in any meaningful way defective.

    One interesting thing about Hogg (as with his friend and colleague Enoch Powell) is that both were Atheists who converted to Anglicanism. In the case of Powell when he heard calling to him the bells of one of the City churches and in the case of Hogg when as an undergraduate sitting an examination in PPE he as he put it discovered that in answering the question posed his unbelief undermined his unbelief – and from that day on became a believer.

  93. ChristianCool says:

    @BillyS

    This whole thing with @Ray started when Ray MOCKED and celebrated the fact that Judge Brett Kavanaugh (now JUSTICE Kavanaugh) was being falsely accused in public. Ray laughed at him for being put through this “Salem Witch Trial-style” public lynching in a hysteria not seen since the movie “Crucible”. Ray’s reasoning: Kavanaugh made a “folksy remark” when asked about his coaching of his daughter’s basketball team about “these girls are fierce”. 🙄 Clearly, to those versed in basic charm, that comment was a PR thing, a liability ploy and not an endorsement of radical western feminism.

    Instead of showing compassion and sympathy for a fellow man, heck a fellow human being, Ray mocked the Judge. I called Ray out on that because he was clearly in the wrong. I am not equating myself to calling Ray out as Paul did to Peter (@@@@) but the mocking and jeering of a CLEARLY INNOCENT man was reprehensible. 😡 No comment can justify the mocking of another human being put through a shame public “trial by mob”. It reminds me of the kangaroo court the Sanhedrin gave Jesus or Jezebel set up for Naboth, whom Jezebel paid people to falsely accuse and sentence hiom to death in order to steal Naboth’s livelihood and land) – see 1 Kings 21.

    If men will not stand up and defend other men when put through a pogrom whipped up by a hysterical mob of radical FemiNazis, then we are truly doomed and without hope. 😦 Instead of admitting his mistake, he attacked me personally (ad hominen), which is ineffective and childish.

    I am moving on.

  94. ChristianCool says:

    Sorry folks, reference above is: about when Paul called out Peter to his face (Galatians 2:11-21).

    But @BillyS, do you call me a “faker” because I no longer believe in Marriage 2.0 scam? Or is it because of my open admission that I do sometimes engage in non-martial sex when dating a woman on a regular basis?

    Not that I feel the need to mount a robust defense of myself, but I do NOT have a choice in the matter. When I was younger and America was a slightly more sane place (say pre-9/11 or pre-2006), I stayed virgin until age 18 and only lost it because the girl I was dating was also a virgin and we were engaged to marry. And then I married at age 22, very young for today’s standards and not once did I run around on my wife. But that world is GONE, marriage is no longer seen as a viable Christian institution, but one redefined by corrupt Feminist courts with sole purpose of enslaving, imprisoning, and stealing from men, all under the guise of “justice”. I refuse to willingly give myself into slavery and imprisonment.

    You may say, “yes, you do have a choice”, but I do not. Court-enforcement theft and slavery is not a choice, at least not for me. That is choosing between suicide by jumping into a snake pit or burning to death.

    Being that Dalrock is a Red Pill Christian website discussion, I find it ironical that some STILL stick to “traditional marriage” as IF that still existed in America today. It does not. Traditional Christian marriage is a lifelong commitment between a man, woman, and God, with two witnesses present. That is the Genesis definition of such a union and no “party”, “church”, or “government forms” are involved.

    How many Christian women today would be willing to engage in a real Christian marriage? Probably none. Women are women, Christian or not. They WANT the courts backing up her power to ruin me whenever she wants. She wants the loaded handgun and my signed permission for her to shoot me with it anytime she wants. Dalrock calls it the “ThreatPoint”.

    Marriage 2.0 is where a man basically becomes a “hostage negotiator” in his own life and home. The husband/slave has to engage in a regular lifestyle of “fighting for his marriage”, and always trying to talk his wife out of pulling out the gun you gave her when you signed that court-enforcement marriage document and using it against the husband.

    It reminds me of Matthew 10:36 where Jesus said “… a man’s enemies are the members of his own household” (in reference to Micah 7:6). That does NOT mean that a man SHOULD seek to add and invite enemies and dangers into his own household or life. It simply states the fact that such is often the reality of life.

    But those of us who refuse to accept the human-created, court-enforced Marriage 2.0 sham are now called MGTOW or “Peter Pan” or even “fake Christians”. It is really unfortunate that more Christians do not completely buck this awful “marriage” scam (if you can a call a one-sided contract a marriage), end Marriage 2.0 as a viable alternative, create a situation where system collapses so those of us who WANT to marry and have a more normal life can then RESET the whole thing into a more equitable, fair, and sane marital system. That is really the shame of it all, IMHO.

  95. Gunner Q says:

    ChristianCool @ October 6, 2018 at 5:15 pm:
    “And I do NOT agree at all that Leftism is a natural human tendency. Leftism is a totalitarian, repressive ideology. While I agree human beings are naturally born into sin and predisposed to evil, human beings are also creatures that love and seek freedom and individual identities as people.”

    *sigh* I can’t help you.

    “Short of a military occupation to purge out the Commies and deport ALL illegals, CA is beyond saving, I am sorry to say.”

    Do it. PLEASE do it. As a California native, I invite and plead the rest of America to punish my leaders’ overt acts of treason and sedition with military force. I would much rather see my state occupied by the Iowa National Guard than the Chinese military. If America’s moral decay is sourced only in California then it should be easy enough to organize.

    But you won’t. As much as you “hate” my evil leaders, you’d rather see them win than take them out. Why does USA even have an army anymore? Oh right, we don’t. Not since women invaded that last male space. I’ll see your (well-placed) hatred of Gavin Newsom and raise you SecDef Mattis’ acceptance of women in the military.

    Where, then, is the source of America’s moral decay?

  96. feeriker says:

    Why does USA even have an army anymore?

    To serve as cannon-fodder reserves for the Israeli Defense Force.

  97. ChristianCool says:

    @Opus

    The American justice and legal system, especially the courts, come DIRECTLY from English Common Law, which is why it is a disastrous mess. Justinian law and jurisprudence is based on laws passed by Senate (and sometimes the Plebs) and is NOT up to un-elected judges to change or decide upon. English Common Law (ECL) is a system derived from the barbarian Germanic tribes (mainly the Anglos and Saxons) who invaded the British Isles after the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th Century AD.

    Under ECL, judges make decisions at random, following other “past judicial precedent” (past judicial decisions). This is highly arbitrary, of course, as what is common to a person from California is completely different to what is common/normal/expected from someone from Alabama. And yet, under ECL a lunatic district court judge in California can impose his/her will upon the citizen of Alabama using Federal Courts. We saw this in 2017 with the Travel Ban and DACA (an unconstitutional amnesty by Pres decree by B. Hussein Obummer). It is insane.

    Under ECL, a judge “makes law” by issuing judicial decrees. Judges also can override and re-write dully Legislature-enacted and Presidential-signed laws on a whim (like Justice Roberts did to “save Obamacare” by saying the “mandate” was a tax (lawful) and not a fee/penalty (unlawful), as written in Obamacare law).

    The Founders never ever intended for ECL to be a system where we had a “judicial tyranny” as explained in Federalist Papers (an explanation of what each part of Constitution meant). The Founders promised Article III of the US Constitution guaranteed the judiciary had a limited role to “review” the laws, NOT make laws out of thin air. In fact, the reason we had the Constitutional Convention in 1787 in the first place was to STOP judges from being tyrants (judicial abuses led to a famous civil unrest called “Shay’s Rebellion”).

    The Left, however, understood that most of what they wanted to impose on Americans was unpopular and impossible to pass through normal Legislative process. So they worked out a plan: use the Federal courts (judiciary) to create and IMPOSE new laws. Initially, the Supreme Court (which had a Democrat majority at the time) did “something good” by ending segregation in public schools under the decision Brown v. Board of Education. After Brown case, the Justices in the Supreme Court began using the court to create new laws, create new rights, and impose these by force.

    We had abortion “rights” created by a “magical view” of the 14th Amendment. The 14th has NOTHING, not one word about abortion, and yet the Justices magically found such a right there. The 14th Amendment was plainly written with intent to ensure former slaves and freed blacks had equal civil rights. Recently, Justice Kennedy also magically found the “right to gay marriage” in the 14th as well.

    The courts have greatly abused ECL traditions of “precedent” and their Article III powers. To fix this, we would need a new Constitutional Amendment clearly limiting judicial powers, but in today’s hyper-polarized and divided America, there is 0% chance of that. The Democrats rely too much on court abuses and Justices acting like legislators to support any limits on judicial powers. 😦

    The Left has abused the judiciary in America so often over and over again, until Conservatives FINALLY realized they had to fight back and put an end to this insanity. They established groups like the “Judicial Crisis Network” and “The Federalist Society” to help select qualified judges to be appointed. This is how Trump got his list of judges

    Yes, just like in UK, a Justice basically has to be a lawyer and that is often enough, in terms of “basic qualifications”. This whole thing with Kavanaugh was The Left reacting to losing their majority on the Supreme Court, their “super legislature”. They now know their abuse of the Federal courts will be greatly limited.

    The Left has unleashed their #MeToo hysteria movement and used false criminal accusations against a man THEY KNEW was innocent from day 1. The Left would do and destroy anything to keep power and prevent their Marxist chokehold on the Court to be taken from them.

    That is what this whole thing was about. The Supreme Court in the USA has become a political wing of the Left (Socialists / Democrats), so when the Right (Conservatives / Republicans) fights back, the Left goes crazy. False accusations, death threats, harrassment… it is all “fair game” to them! 😡 These popele only want power, even if they have to burn the country to the ground.

    Ps. FYI, in UK, the Courts are now (at least that I know of) beginning to re-write existing laws passed by Parliament and UK Courts have recently magically created “No-Fault Divorce” out of thin air, just like we have here in USA!!
    ( https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6144045/UK-couples-allowed-no-fault-divorces-major-overhaul-laws.html ).

    The UK now has “no fault divorce”, so gear up to see mass chaos, increased litigation, long, drawn-out court battles where lawyers plunder their clients life’s savings in divorce court, even more than before. Divorce in UK will become easier and more one-sided than ever. 😦 sad to see UK will now join America in the divorce-rape epidemic.

    If you think divorce laws in Uk were bad, just wait until “no fault divorce” mania catches fire there!! 😮

    Pa2. As the courts in UK are now beginning to more aggressively write and re-write laws (instead of Parliament), expect political fights like you see in USA. The more politicized courts become, the more Kavanaugh-like the nomination process will become in UK too. It is a matter of time, all it takes is for courts in UK to become more political, create or re-write laws, and for one party (likely Labour) to demand courts pass laws Parliament refuses to.

  98. ChristianCool says:

    @Gunner Q says:

    If Leftism, as you say, is a NATURAL human tendency, then WHY do all Leftist regimes (Communism, Nazism = national Socialism, Socialism, Khmer Rouge, etc) ALL require repressive, police-State repressive tactics?

    If Leftism was so natural, shouldn’t the population naturally embrace it and love it? Why the Statzi was needed in East Germany? Why the Gestapo in Germany in 1930s? Why the NDVK/KBG in Soviet Union? Why the brutality and camps all over China and North Korea?

    There is simply NO solution to California today, short of a military occupation by the United States. I do not even consider CA to be part of America anymore. I was there with my Mom 3 days, it is one of the most depressing s#itholes I have ever been in, and that is saying a lot because I lived in south America 4.5 years and it sucks there. CA is a rogue nation right now. There WILL be a reckoning with CA in due time, because the State leaders are openly defying Federal Laws, just like Alabama defied Feds back in the 1960s, culminating with George Wallace blocking University doors and the Feds sending in National Guard.

    The People of CA do not need to be punished, but the illegals HAVE TO GO. And people like Jerry Brown must be arrested and tried. The guy is openly defying Federal laws and Gavin Newsome WILL do free Medicaid for all illegals when he is sworn in. His plan is simple: swell up the illegal invasion of CA, have Census in 2020 count all illegals Newsome will draw in BY THE MILLIONS with “free” healthcare and doubling income taxes on middle class, get more Electoral College votes nationally, and speed-up replace Americans (who are fleeing by the tens of thousands each month from CA) to make sure the CA Democrats continue to have the absurd # of Congressional Seats in DC. This is why Trump wants to ask Citizenship question in 2020 Census and Dems want to block it. He wants this charade exposed.

    If we did not count the illegals in Census, CA would lose at least 3-5 electoral college votes and anywhere between 8-14 seats in Congress. The illegals are the lifeblood of CA politics. They vote by the tens of thousands and they are now the “favorite group” of the Democrats; black people are taken for granted and ignored completely in CA, since illegals, mostly Latinos, are the Devilcrats’ sole priority now.
    When I worked Immigration law, we had clients file for citizenship and admit they voted and Immi officers YAWNED they defrauded US laws and claimed falsely to have US Citizenship (this was during the Islamic Dictatorship we experienced for 8 years). 😡

    Conflating the 22 million illegal invaders with useless broads in US military or the foreigner dominance of CA is totally off-point.

    BTW, I do NOT favor women in military at all, short of very basic supporting roles, like working as a cashier at the NaxyEx or a stocker at Army Commissary stores. Putting a woman in frontlines is the dumbest thing EVER. The only army I know of that relies on women on frontlines is Germany, a dying country where pregnant women have military combat uniforms now. 🙄 Some (mainly Progressives) will argue we need female soldiers to deal with “house-to-house” searches in so they can patdown women residents is the main excuse I hear. 🙄 ‘Cause God-forbid, our military offends Mrs. Al-Kaboom down in Baghdad, Syria, or Afghanistan. 🙄

    To stop the idiotic women in military, all you need is to repeal the insane and useless laws we have in Federal Statutes, like Title IX and the “labor laws” we have preventing discrimination. No one should be hired or fired because of their race, gender, reltion, etc – they should be hired or fired by merit only.

    @ feeriker
    The IDF can defend themselves and we give them boatloads of weapons to do so. We have a military to defend our country from invasion, mainly, but have misused it thanks to the Progressives. But thanks to the Bush-Bama (and Hillary’s) foreign policies, we wasted $7 TRILLION destroying and rebuilding 3rd world s#itholes in Middle East.

    Trump wants these useless wars ended. he has ordered Mathis to come up with a victory plan for Afghanistan or we are OUT. He is finishing mopping up ISIS in Eastern Syria, once that is over, we will be out of that hellhole too, Thank God. 🙂 Except Assad to “gas his own people” the moment Trump announces a pullout from Syria again, however. Our “trusted” Deep State “Intelligence Community” will say so and media will back-them up, just wait. -_-

    Trump hates these useless expensive wars. I watched every debate, he lambasted Rubio and Jeb! over and over again because it. He just railed against in last week in his rallies. We no longer need their oil, once ANWAR begins producing oil and prices come down, it will be harder and harder to convince Americans we need to be involved in that Jihadist toilet anymore. Idiotic savages need to be left alone and be repressed brutally by their own dictators to stay under control. Not America’s problem.

  99. ray says:

    ChristianFool — “@BillyS
    This whole thing with @Ray started when Ray MOCKED and celebrated the fact that Judge Brett Kavanaugh (now JUSTICE Kavanaugh) was being falsely accused in public.”

    Is that what triggered your walkabout of verbal projectile vomitus, boy? Shit if I’d known it was that easy, I’d have done it long ago.

    I mocked Choirboy Kavanaugh all over the internet last week, not just here. Pointed out to the cuckservatives that Kavvie spent his career pushing the Empress Empowerment Cart, what with majority female law-clerks (which he trumpeted loudly!) and girls hoops teams and God knows what-all else. Now he’s got two daughters and his feminist tendencies will be even more pronounced. All I did was state simple facts from simple observations. Do you not imagine I knew that it (and I) would be unpopular for stating it? I did it because it had to be done.

    What did supposedly ‘uber-conservative’ Kavanaugh do for American BOYS AND MEN over the past decades? Hm? Because EVERYBODY and their granny jumped on the Female-First train, right along with the judge, the past fifty years. That don’t take no cojones, shit it’s the Cultural Default setting.

    Then Kav coughed up his grrlpower credentials to his female prosecutors/persecutors, foolishly hoping that because he’d been a Good Feminist Boy, they’d let him off lightly. God in heaven he did everything but cry and mewl. It was so embarrassing that I couldn’t look, so instead went out to warm-up my woodchipper.

    Thems the facts, I’m glad he was confirmed but thems the facts, and like I said, if I’d known the mere truth would send ChristianFool into triple-menses hysterionics, well hell I’d have done it sooner? Now that I know he’s a pre-triggered-soyboy, I promise to be more attentive next time. :O)

  100. BillyS says:

    CC,

    But @BillyS, do you call me a “faker” because I no longer believe in Marriage 2.0 scam? Or is it because of my open admission that I do sometimes engage in non-martial sex when dating a woman on a regular basis?

    The latter. No Christian should be boastful that they regularly violate clear Biblical requirements. The requirement doesn’t go away because it is hard. Keep doing what you want, but it is as Christian as my exwife’s divorce of me because she was unhappy. No difference. Both end up living in ongoing sin without any remorse. You are no different than the women you claim to despise.

  101. BillyS says:

    Ray makes up for his silent day-to-day life by acting big online.

  102. ray says:

    BillyS —

    “Ray,
    You have to get your attack in against VoxDay, even though he has nothing to do with CC. I don’t much care for CC’s fakeness, but you are equally fake. Who are you a sock puppet for? I would say Scalsi, but I doubt he could stay undercover here.”

    I know. I just luuurrved smacking two vultures with one rock! I thought I’d see what else flushed from the thicket. Turned out to be you.

    And your razor-vision caught me out again! I AM a sock puppet for Scalsi? From jumpstreet. Scalsi and I have been in cahoots since the Nineties! With our sole target, our sole purpose in life, to Take Down the Great Dark Lord! who didn’t even show up on the scene until the mid-oughts.

    But anyway . . . who is Scalsi, please? It’s only fair that I know who it is I am sock-puppeting. OK thanks a lot.

  103. Oscar says:

    @ Gunner

    As much as you “hate” my evil leaders, you’d rather see them win than take them out.

    Isn’t that your job, since you live there?

    I’d much prefer that we actually follow the constitution, where the federal government is limited to dealing with foreign policy, the Indian tribes, and disputes and trade between the states, and generally leaves the states to govern themselves and face the consequences of their governance.

    But, since that’ll never happen, what will probably happen (I think) is that the US will break up into two or more countries (I think it’ll be three).

  104. Gunner Q says:

    Oscar @ 9:57 am:
    “As much as you “hate” my evil leaders, you’d rather see them win than take them out.”

    “Isn’t that your job, since you live there?”

    I’m glad you asked! The purpose of my blog is exposing their evil as best I can and calling out evil by its names, as Christ did with the Pharisees. That is the example Christ set for us. If you want me to do more than a tiny blog on the Internet then please provide allies, resources and opportunities.

    The Cuckservative thinks being Christian is first gaining worldly power “by any means necessary” and then using that power to accomplish social good. You see this attitude in everything the Republican Party does, everything the modern Church does and here, ChristianCool thinking Evil is a lack of proper education rather than the human default setting. I don’t have the words to convince him of the secular humanism of that but if I find them, I’ll put them on my blog.

    I’m doing what I can with what I have while ChristianCool thinks he can get rid of the wicked by letting them keep what they steal. Which of us do you fault?

  105. Oscar says:

    @ GunnerQ

    If you want me to do more than a tiny blog on the Internet then please provide allies, resources and opportunities.

    Again, that’s not my responsibility, even if I had such resources. I left California 29 years ago, and haven’t looked back. We have our own scoundrels to vote out in my state, and we have one who’s vulnerable next month, so I’ll devote my limited resources to that.

    I’m doing what I can with what I have while ChristianCool thinks he can get rid of the wicked by letting them keep what they steal. Which of us do you fault?

    Do I have to fault one of you?

  106. BillyS says:

    You are more likely just an idiot Ray. One who claims Christian backing but only attempts to stir up strife. The Scriptures are clear about the sin of such people. I doubt you will repent, but you definitely should and you will ultimately face consequences for your sin.

    Enjoy your mom’s basement though!

  107. BillyS says:

    Gunner Q,

    I appreciate that you are attempting to do something. I met some great people when I lived in CA years ago, but I think it is too far gone now to redeem, without a massive repentance on the part of the populace which is very unlikely.

    I never plan on moving there, even though I could easily get a job in many places due to my skills. It is far too corrupt for me.

  108. Gunner Q says:

    ” I met some great people when I lived in CA years ago, but I think it is too far gone now to redeem, without a massive repentance on the part of the populace which is very unlikely.”

    All of humanity is too far gone. You just haven’t yet noticed that the problem of evil is not sourced in geography.

    Do you know what will happen when you let California go? It’ll ally itself to China within the day and the Chicomms will gain a massive foothold in North America. Come on, do you think Sacramento would be so eager to commit treason against the Feds without having already made backroom deals with a foreign power?

  109. ChristianCool says:

    @Ray

    Is that you in your avatar pic, sir? See Ray’s pic: gravatar.com/1f4e6ba5f5ca27957f37f7dad3b62531 . You are ugly and fat. I am sorry, you are and you are probably a 2 or 3 in appearance on your best day. Maybe you are a nice person when you are not mocking and jeering innocent men when falsely accused by a woman, on the internet on your free time. Who knows, maybe you are a great person? *shrug*

    I can understand your animosity when you deal with a man like me who is physically and intellectually superior to you in many ways. Men who are 8 or above. It must drive you crazy how some men take the time to you know…. go to the gym, buy nice clothes, work hard and have a cool car. These guys get the women, even if we have to contend with our women, which are subpar quality… even the 7+ in our country are 4’s and 5′ in eastern Europe. It is rough. But at least I can run game and get myself a woman above a 7 for US standards, in shape, who is not a total mess.

    But a guy like Ray cannot get women above a 2 in looks, in America today (for free). Just not possible. He either has to pay-4-play or he has to rub it off. I gotcha, you are mad. I would be too if I was in your situation.

    You can keep hating on me for having my life together and you are a mess. It was not easy to be where I am today, but again… would you understand real sacrifices to have your life together, brother?
    I have made MANY sacrifices in my own life, including depriving myself of fried foods, heavy-cal food, and spending minimum 5 days a week at gym, even when I go on vacation, I hit the hotel gym. Not one night goes by when I do not do at least 100-200 push ups before I get in the shower and drink a glass of protein power with skim milk before bed.

    That is called EFFORT, it is determination, and it is willpower. It makes me a better man overall. I ENJOY looking good and make sacrifices to do so.

    My suggestion to you Ray, and I am saying this as nicely as I can. You need major improvements: start by getting a face cream, I recommend Olay Regenerist for nighttime, sunscreen SPF 110 to stop your skin from getting any worse than already is. You look years older than you should. You need to spend a lot more time at the gym (4 days a week minimum), stop eating doughnuts, fried foods, and high sugar/carb foods. And save money and go buy some better clothes for your profile photo (i.e. black suit, custom-fit, square pocket, silk Trump brand tie) – I recommend Joseph A Banks, they are affordable and stylish. Then please lose AT LEAST 50lbs, grow some muscle, even if you cannot get a 4-pack, at least lose that truck spare tire in your gut and double-chin. And get a haircut from the 2010’s…. cause dang, man, you look straight outta the 1970s. 😮 Your whole image is just a mess. 😮

    You CANNOT blame women for refusing you, brother. You need to work on yourself bigly. I am not trying to be mean… but you, as a man, should reflect on yourself. You should HONESTLY take an honest look in mirror and self-improve. You look like a trainwreck.

    I honestly feel bad for you now. 😦 Seeing your pic explained a lot. 😦

    You would get turned down in the Philippine, sir. Over the years, I have worked on some immigration cases of truly desperate Filipina women marry foreign guys who are a couple points ABOVE from you and you can see they are “toughing it out” until their Resident Card came out. Ray, you would strike out in Manila, sir, so time for self-improvement, instead of hating on me. My .02 cents.

    Think about what I am saying, Ray. Fill yourself with willpower to get better, look better, and feel better. Mocking and hating on innocent men like Kavanaugh and mocking him “all over the Internet” (as you stated above) for being falsely accused of rape will not make you a better, happier person. Improving yourself will. 😉

    As my friend always said, “You hate me ’cause you ain’t me”. Applies perfectly here.

  110. ChristianCool says:

    @Gunner Q

    I agree that humanity has a problem with evil. That is part of human nature. But California is beyond saving now. The population is majority foreign-born now. It is a de facto foreign country. The mentality of the non-rural area Californians is so brainwashed, they cannot be saved and become Americans again.

    I know people from Simi Valley that moved here to the USA (Simi Valley is one of the most conservative areas in CA) and even they sometimes surprise me by saying stuff like “healthcare is a right” (i.e. govt has to pay for it)! 😮 They have been brainwashed by the education system and the Hollywood culture around them far too long.

    Yes, it is very possible China will have a huge say in the “People’s Democratic Nation of California”, but they ALREADY do. Notice how Richard Gere has vanished? China banned him from all movies and from Hollywood for supporting the Dalai Lama. China ALREADY runs most of California. Google is now going to ally itself with the Chinese dictatorship in “project Dragonfly”. It is canceling all contracts with US Pentagon. These people are already allied with China. They hate America. Hating America is standard in CA; not hating the USA makes you “weird”… or racist or whatever. 🙄

    I know you are attached to California, it is your home, birthplace, all that. I totally get it. But it is over. Unless we have military rule by America, California is a foreign country in everything but name. It already acts this way. Doubt there is the appetite in America to send the National Guard there to restore American governance in CA, but apart from that, CA is finished. I am sorry. 😦

    Ps. I personally do not want to lose a State, but we are on the brink in this country. When the Left loses the elections Nov 6, 2018, they will go even more crazy and more violent. California govt is so far left, they may very well declare itself a foreign country and refuse Supreme Court rulings and Federal laws (the excuse: Trump is not legitimate because of Russia or Kavanaugh is on court and he is not legitimate, etc). 🙄 A confrontation is coming there. I hope we restore American governance, otherwise, might as well let CA go forever.

    Ps. You said before that “leftism is natural to humans”. I think evil is natural, but not leftism.

    If Leftism, as you say, is a NATURAL human tendency, then WHY do all Leftist regimes (Communism, Nazism = national Socialism, Socialism, Khmer Rouge, etc) ALL require repressive, police-State repressive tactics?

    If Leftism was so natural, shouldn’t the population naturally embrace it and love it? Why the Statzi was needed in East Germany? Why the Gestapo in Germany in 1930s? Why the NDVK/KBG in Soviet Union? Why the brutality and camps all over China and North Korea? Shouldn’t the people embrace that ideology naturally, without resistance or hesitance?

  111. ChristianCool says:

    @BillyS says: “No Christian should be boastful that they regularly violate clear Biblical requirements. The requirement doesn’t go away because it is hard. Keep doing what you want, but it is as Christian as my ex-wife’s divorce of me because she was unhappy. No difference. Both end up living in ongoing sin without any remorse. You are no different than the women you claim to despise.”

    To say me, a guy who married young to avoid non-marital sex early on, is no better than a 30-something year old Carrousel Rider woman is a joke. Come on, Billy, you know better than that. 🙄

    And yes, I do despise the Carrousel Riders. In fact, you will be surprised that last two women I met, I felt a degree of disgust… I cannot explain it. I have become more and more repulsed by these women. The Kavanaugh thing has triggered a level of disgust in me for the women of this country that I cannot even explain in words. Not all the women are embracing the destruction of a man so clearly innocent, but the vast majority of them are. I feel so appalled by the whole thing, I have began to tests women I meet, with questions such as “what do you think of this whole Kavanaugh thing?” or “Have you ever done the Kiki Challenge dance?” or “ever been ____ (party destination)?”. Because I have legal training, I can ask these questions casually and gauge the answers easily. ou get good at this when you have attended hundreds of depositions and many trials. I can tell when a faker is trying to trick me into buying that she is a real Christian or a leftist reformed slut.

    The answers reveal whether or not they are an enemy early on, so I do not waste my time. My disgust with I would say at least 80% of the women I meet answer these questions and reveal themselves to be the enemy have caused me a revulsion I cannot even explain. I dump them harshly. I walk out from a meeting with them and say nothing. I ghost them and when they contact me I pretend not to know who they are. I feel that some of the mercy I once had in me is gone for these women. I have lived through 1 year of #MeToo, but this whole Kavanaugh thing has really changed me. I now see leftist women not only as misguided, but as evil. The enemy. I am just DONE with women who don’t get it. I am tired of this crap and refuse to give the enemy another inch into my territory.

    To even consider marrying the enemy is laughable. I am not one of these guys who can have “hate sex” with women, so marrying a woman I truly despise due to her mindset/mentality is out of the question. And we are dealing with at least 80% of women being disqualified because they are rabid leftists and closet feminists (or are in-fact feminists even if they refuse the label).

    However, Billy, I agree with you, to an extent. I would much prefer NOT to have the sin of non-marital sex in my life. I honestly would. I can say that after I became widowed, I wanted to re-marry and that was always the plan. My initial intention was never to be single forever.

    Think about it: why would I have stayed a virgin until I was 18 (and I was engaged to that girl, btw, we were serious about getting married, but I had to call it off.). That is why I married at 22 and stayed married and faithful all 12 years until she passed. I did NOT want to live in non-marital sexual sin. I did not for many years, obviously. Clearly, I am not someone who wanted to willingly live in sin.

    BUT the world has changed drastically. I am now 36 and I barely recognize the women in our country today. It is as if I was in a cryogenic chamber and suddenly woke up 12 years later and the single women in the country completely changed. The culture changed, I knew that, but I foolishly believed the Christian women would have stayed the same, since Christianity had not changed from its original intent and texts from ~2000 years ago.

    But I was wrong to think thatChristian girls/church girls were still the same as 13.5 years ago, when I was last single/before I married. The women, even in church, have become corrupted beyond my widest imagination. The culture permeated everywhere. I had single friends tell me that all the time while married and I did not believe them (I thought they were exaggerating). Once I started dating again, I was shocked. I would go far as say the girls in church many times can be WORSE than non-Christian ones… many are “new converts”… probably looking for Beta Bux to bail them out. -_-

    Not only that, in the 12 years I was married, I worked in legal field 6 of these years and then started law school. It was an eye-opener. Marriage 2.0 is a TRAP, it is designed to destroy men. Marriage 2.0 is dictated by feminist “family court” judges (Emperors in Black Robes) and it is enforced by armed police and “houses of corrections” (jails).

    If the entire Marriage 2.0 system, created to enslave, impoverish, and steal from men was not bad enough, then we have the criminal system. Women today can falsely accuse a man of a crime, as we all know, but the ease of doing so is just staggering. A wife has EVERY BENEFIT to accuse her husband falsely. She has every financial incentive imaginable, especially during the divorce.

    A wife has many MORE beneficial reasons to falsely accuse her husband of a crime than a girlfriend.

    Marital Rape, a crime that a man CANNOT DISPROVE under almost any circumstances (short of an audio tape of wife telling man she will falsely accuse the husband) carries 15 years mandatory prison in FL (that is MINIMUM sentence you can get, since it is a 2nd degree felony and max can be 30 years). It is a sex crime and there is NO PAROLE either. In some leftist Democratic-controlled States there is no Statute of Limitations on rape (like Maryland, California, NY), including “marital rape”. So 20 years later a wife can accuse you of marital rape.

    So I am looking at facing false criminal accusations from the woman/wife, being divorce raped, and losing my freedom, going to prison for crimes I did not commit, and everything I worked HARD for.

    Or I am looking at occasionally engaging in non-marital sex with a woman I am dating, because I refuse to cave in and give the woman, who acted irresponsibly her whole life, the “marriage bailout”, she wanted later in life.

    TOUGH CHOICE, huh? 🙄

    By the time I am 60 or 70 or whatever, I will not even bother much with sex, so I will just tough it out until than and not re-marry. It is a terrible deal. This is not Christian marriage; this is Marriage 2.0. This is a war for the survival of America and Christianity we are in, but only one side is fighting it actively. Men did not start this war, it has been waged against us unimpeded from 50 long years, and now the FemiNazis are beginning to enact their Bolshevik feminist plan and I am not about to help one of them with my freedom or financial resources. The FemiNazis are in open war now.

    I will not give aid and comfort to the enemy. I am not about to help the enemy gain 1 more inch. Men did not start this war, but they now must finish end it and try to save what is left of our country and the Church. No thank you, I will not give the enemy any more than they have already taken from me, via legislative and legal abuse.

    So really, I do not have much of a choice here. In war, we rarely have much choice.

  112. Oscar says:

    @ Gunner Q

    All of humanity is too far gone. You just haven’t yet noticed that the problem of evil is not sourced in geography.

    Have you traveled much? Have you ever noticed that some geographical locations are better than others? Why do you suppose that is?

  113. Magneto2975 says:

    Canada is moving to prohibit the use of exculpatory evidence like this in criminal trials. Imagine going to prison knowing that the video evidence that clears yuh was disallowed before the trial even started.

    https://www.demelolaw.com/bill-c-51-proposed-changes-to-sexual-assault-law-in-canada/

  114. BillyS says:

    CC,

    To say me, a guy who married young to avoid non-marital sex early on, is no better than a 30-something year old Carrousel Rider woman is a joke. Come on, Billy, you know better than that. 🙄

    Justifying sin is still justifying sin, whatever the sin is. You know it is wrong.

    Maybe you will do it and need to repent, but I see no evidence of any repentance on your part in your posts. That is the most serious flaw.

    God’s grace is there even when we sin, but we should never exploit that (it shows a lack of fear we discussed in another thread) and definitely not boast of it.

    However, Billy, I agree with you, to an extent. I would much prefer NOT to have the sin of non-marital sex in my life. I honestly would. I can say that after I became widowed, I wanted to re-marry and that was always the plan. My initial intention was never to be single forever.

    I didn’t want the sex spigot completely shut off either, but guess what? I had not control over that. I am a fair bit older than you, but the desire did not just beam out. Yeah it sucks, but I would never boast in sin in my current state. (I was married almost 30 years in case you didn’t know.)

    Think about it: why would I have stayed a virgin until I was 18 (and I was engaged to that girl, btw, we were serious about getting married, but I had to call it off.). That is why I married at 22 and stayed married and faithful all 12 years until she passed. I did NOT want to live in non-marital sexual sin. I did not for many years, obviously. Clearly, I am not someone who wanted to willingly live in sin.

    I did stay a virgin until my mid 20s when I married, so your story of woe has no impact on me. Life is tough. God’s commands and requirements don’t shift because it is hard.

    So I am looking at facing false criminal accusations from the woman/wife, being divorce raped, and losing my freedom, going to prison for crimes I did not commit, and everything I worked HARD for.

    You think you will avoid that risk with your practice? The same accusations and pilfering can apply, even now. Heard of “common law marriage” and other ways for a woman to steal from a man?

    By the time I am 60 or 70 or whatever, I will not even bother much with sex, so I will just tough it out until than and not re-marry.

    You really need an older mentor with some Biblical chops. You think the desire beams out when you get to that age? Think again. It does ease, but not completely. I am not quite there, but close enough to know that it won’t vanish, as you seem to think.

    I will not give aid and comfort to the enemy. I am not about to help the enemy gain 1 more inch. Men did not start this war, but they now must finish end it and try to save what is left of our country and the Church. No thank you, I will not give the enemy any more than they have already taken from me, via legislative and legal abuse.

    Unless you are really short in that area, you are giving far more than an inch. (Pun intended) You are enabling the same thing. You just happen to fall into the area of AF apparently.

    You are participating fully in the system you claim to despise, yet you are ignorant of that participation, or at least claim to be.

    So really, I do not have much of a choice here. In war, we rarely have much choice.

    No, you have plenty of choice. You just choose to not keep your pants on and not think with your male body part.

  115. ChristianCool says:

    @Magneto2975

    Dang man, that is terrible news. 😮 Canada has always been worse than the USA when it came to Leftism. Ann Coulter was banned from the country for basically speaking against mass immigration. There seem to be no Constitutionally-guaranteed freedoms in Canada, such as guaranteed freedom of speech or 4th/5th/6th Amendment protections for due process and individual liberties of the accused and the citizen alike.

    But thanks to Trump, Trudeau had to take a bad trade deal and I hear his polls are dropping even more there. When is next Canadian election?

    Maybe there is still time to change that, by removing Liberal PMs from office.

    Essentially, what Canada is doing is making it IMPOSSIBLE to use critical evidence to defend oneself, so that kangaroo courts for men will be the norm. It will be a Kavanaugh public lynching for every man accused! 😮

    I hear Toronto is hell for men as is; fat feminists everywhere, high crime, terrible housing market. Maybe it is time to bailout and move?

  116. ChristianCool says:

    GunnerQ:

    here is yet another reason California has got to go and we need a WALL separating America from it:

    More Illegal Aliens Giving Birth to Anchor Babies in LA than Total U.S. Births in 14 States Combined

    Full article: https://www.breitbart.com/california/2018/10/10/more-illegal-aliens-giving-birth-to-anchor-babies-in-los-angeles-than-total-u-s-births-in-14-states/

    California IS a foreign country. More than 52% of total population is foreign born. By definition, that is a place populated by citizens of foreign country, with allegiances to that country.

    CalExit now, I say.

  117. ChristianCool says:

    @BillyS

    1) So to you, a sin is a sin is a sin, right?

    So God, the Ultimate Righteous Judge, will punish a hungry street-dwelling petty thief (sin) the same way as Nazi leaders (sin of mass genocide and deaths of millions)? 🙄 Under the sin = sin, that is what you are saying.

    Or do you accept the concept in real Christianity that certain sins and certain lifestyles are worst (Galatians 5:19-21)?

    2) To compare Mother Theresa’s sins (which I assure you, she committed plenty) to an African warlord, for instance, is like comparing me/my life’s choices and dedication to God to a new convert Carrousel Rider in her mid-30s. It is dishonest and lacks intellectual ability.

    Under that mindset, you are siding with the Beth Moore’s of the world; once a woman “converts”, her entire past sexual, drug, criminal, violent, etc history is wiped away and no man is allowed to even inquire about it! 😆

    3) I repent for my non-marital sex in my prayers, but also ask God (who everyone would agree is in total and complete control of everything, all the time, everywhere) “what the heck happened to our women, the churches, and our culture?”

    It is not that I do not fear God, because I do. I would never have made it this far in life on my own and I am humble enough to admit that.

    4) You made the choice to cut yourself off from sex completely. After 30 years of marriage (and by what I am gathering, a divorce-rape at the end), you just became a monk?

    Or do you indulge yourself in jacking it watching porn? Or do you have some woman you like to watch and lust after her as you relieve yourself? Be honest now….

    (And if you ever masturbate, isn’t that… a sin?!!? Which means you are in sin, which means IF you believe in the “a sin is a sin is a sin” concept, you are just as bad as the German leadership in the 1930s and 1940s! 🙄

    5) This is not a “story of woe”. I was just stating a fact and the fact that you cannot see the difference between that and Carrousel Riders into their late 30s is simply stunning to me.

    Do you see the difference between a single mom of 3, by 3 different guys, who banged bad boys all over the place and now, in her 40s, is looking for a target THAN a woman who was married her whole life to same man and had 3 kids by same man, and was a good faithful woman?

    6) Hah, trust me, I am a veteran Paralegal and law student. I know “common marriage laws” scams with back of my hand. The key to establishing residence together is rececing mail at your residence. My mailbox is centralized, lock and key and I keep these inside a safe, which women do not have access to.

    I also have a very well-designed camera system in my home and car. When a woman is around, all cameras are on and recording everything, from car to inside home. I carry a small electronic tape recorder with me all the time, so when I go see a woman, I record everything. I have a RAID system in my PC and 2 5TB extral HDDs where I keep everything FOREVER.

    Not getting married, if a woman accuses me of a crime, I fight the charges. Sucks, but I will fight. I never ever allow any woman to move in with me either. She does not drag me to divorce court and get my home free and clear by making false criminal accusations.

    You are talking to someone who has seen a LOT of bad stuff in the courts…. false accusations, scams, clients speaking foreign language I understand and trying to cook-up a story before meeting with attorney (not realizing I understood everything). I have a very dim view of the legal system and why I am going to law school; I want to fight this hard and viciously. It is the only way to try to give hope to the next generation of men (if any hope actually still remains).

    From a legal point of view, I trust no one and therefore, I am careful to very very casually keep my ducks in a row (I am so good at this legal stuff, it is natural to me, second nature, as they say), to greatly minimize all risks to me legally and criminally, especially around women.

    7) Even if my sexual desires do not weak by the time I am 60 or 70, then fine. I will look like crap by then anyway and will likely NOT gonna be attracted to women around that age anyway, so unless I become an atheist, only way to get pretty women would be to PAY and that is a bridge I will NEVER ever cross. That is an abomination (see 1 Corinthians 6:15-20).

    Well if I marry a “reformed” Carrouseller, than I have given victory to the enemy, spoiled women who put off marriage to ride many cocks. She has completed her “journey of self-discovery” and I get to be her bailout and future divorce-rape victim, after she finishes reading Eat Pray Love and ride off into the sunset on a new cock-riding adventure on my dime while I move into a shack in the ghetto.

    That is the Feminist dream, and I will have no part in fulfilling it.

    8) How am I “participating fully in the system you claim to despise, yet you are ignorant of that participation, or at least claim to be”??

    9) I do not have a choice. If I had a decent woman to marry in a non-governmental registered marriage ceremony, with pastor and 2 witnesses in a non-common law marriage State, I would go for it. But such a woman is not available or does not exist.

    Women want one thing: your resources. It does not matter if she makes $250k a year, she FEEL ENTITLED to at least 50% of my stuff, no matter what. That is why government-registered and enforced marriage/divorce is all they want.

    So no, I do not have a choice. If I did, I would re-marry and have kid(s) and enjoy life with this woman and grow old with her. But such is not available. I do not know a single trustful woman, in my church or that I have met in like 2 years. And that is back home in FL too and here in Rockies.

    Funny thing I was joking with one of my friends about women and the truth and their hatred of each other. I said to him jokingly that I would only marry a woman if she would consent to a Polygraph exam by a former FBI expert of my questions to her and she could ask me literally anything under polygraph as well. She would NEVER ever agree, as he correctly points out, because she would be exposed to so many lies, the polygraph needle would break.

    To marry in this situation, with this low quality women… nah. I speak Portuguese and know Brazilian culture, and we have an almost unlimited supply of Brazilian women in Orlando dying to marry a gringo for a Green Card, so I can exploit that later on when I hit a dry spell. I am good looking enough, have my finances in a great place, and take excellent care of myself… so I can probably run game and LTR/date into my 40s with no problem at all. After that we will see.

    But marrying some woman in my present situation is just not in the cards. It is financial and legal suicide. I might as well make arrangements for decades in prison after she falsely accuses me of “marital rape”, which I simply cannot disprove in court, and takes all my life’s work.

    You think a woman has a conscience and would even, for 1 second, feel bad to do such a thing? 🙄 If you do, you need to learn a lot more about women. They have NO conscience at all. Solipsism and The War Bride Syndrome are so ingrained in their brain, they do not even see a problem with ruining a man’s life for fun. There IS a reason why so many ancient civilizations, including Hebrews and Islam do not accept a woman’s testimony in court; women lie too much, without even a slight of hesitation or guilt about it. They lie and ruin lives for petty revenge and for their own selfish gains. Break-up with a woman who says “she loves you” and you will see a cold, calculating, evil creature come out of her, that you never knew existed.

    Marrying someone in 2018 is not as simple as you make it out to be. If it was, then why did YOU not re-marry yourself in so many years being alone? ❓

  118. ChristianCool says:

    @BillyS:

    When you have a minute, I would like to hear your thoughts on my last paragraph above:

    “Marrying someone in 2018 is not as simple as you make it out to be. If it was, then why did YOU not re-marry yourself in so many years being alone?” ❓

    The question above is a question I always pose to divorced/un-married Christian men who say “just get re-married and you will not be in non-martial sex sin”. I always respond, humorously “hurry up and marry one of ’em sluts” and text them Dalrock’s article on the matter (to hurry up and marry a slut, just to marry SOMEONE). I get a LOT of texts back when they start reading. The knowledge we gain from Dal’s page, RoK, and Chateau Heartiste is LIFE-ALTERING. The Red Pill truly is a one-way street, once your eyes are open to the truth, there is no going back.

    One funny topic I love to discuss with un-married and divorced older Christian men is about the women they meet and what they want out of life. Some of the stuff I have heard this past years have been stunning: they want adventure; they want a guy who pulls 6-figure income and yet is “location-independent” so HE can pay for THEM to travel and “see stuff”; they want a guy who has no failed marriage and no kids; they want a guy who only exists in these grocery-store checkout line female novels.

    In InsaneMerica, the older a woman is, the more she expects from the man, because she has ridden the CockCarrousel longer and therefore has a longer “list of minimums” she is willing to accept from THE MAN, they think she deserves to marry. While her beauty and fertility has declined by leaps and bounds, her expectations of what a man MUST provide her with/and be have grown exponentially to the point no human male can meet her expectations.

    This is why divorce is so incredibly high in women who have ridden too many cocks. Her ego and sense of entitlement growths with each hook-up, to the point anyone short of having Schwarzenegger’s body, Trump’s money, Leo DiCaprio’;s face, and John Holmes’ dick will never be enough. She will become unhaaaaappy, start an affair via FaceBook and sue you for everything you got (while you rot in jail, of course, she is not going to fight you in divorce court while you are free; you are held without bond for the “marital rapes” you have committed and cannot disprove and the promises to kill her, of course).

    I have seen this movie before many times in my work career… and spoiler alert: it ends the same way every time. The man loses his freedom, present and future wealth, and family every single time.

    But I am curious, BillyS, how come you are still single after being divorced?

Please see the comment policy linked from the top menu.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.