Gotta ask the boss.

As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

–Isaiah 3:12, KJV

Michael Moore is proposing that the US repeal the Second Amendment and replace it with a new amendment.  Moore’s proposed amendment would include a provision to make a man get permission from his wife or girlfriend before buying a gun:

As over 90% of gun violence is committed by men, in order for a man to purchase a gun, he must first get a waiver from his current wife, plus his most recent ex-wife, or any woman with whom he is currently in a relationship (if he’s gay, he must get the waiver from his male spouse/partner). This law has greatly reduced most spousal/domestic gun murders in Canada.

CNS News points out that Moore is not entirely accurate in his description of Canada’s law:

An information sheet and firearm license application form posted online by the Canadian Royal Mounted Police suggests that conjugal partners don’t have to sign off on the license; they just must be notified of their partner’s intent to obtain one

CNS News also notes that under Moore’s proposed amendment MGTOW’s would be treated like adults and not need a woman’s permission to buy a gun.

Moore’s plan does not require waivers for single men who are loners and shun relationships who want to buy guns.

As absurd as Moore’s proposal is, it is being presented as a serious solution from the left. The Hill closes Michael Moore proposes ’28th Amendment’ to regulate gun ownership with:

Democratic lawmakers are facing pressure from the left to introduce new anti-gun violence measures after Sunday’s shooting, which was the most deadly in modern U.S. history.

Republicans have rejected the idea that such violence has a legislative solution.

Related: Setting the record straight on Duluth.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Ask the boss, Disrespecting Respectability, Domestic Violence, Duluth Model, Guns. Bookmark the permalink.

123 Responses to Gotta ask the boss.

  1. Chris says:

    I, like most people, would’ve walked away laughing from something as asinine as this just a few short years ago. But I think it’s only a matter of time before both the First and Second Amendments are deratified in some way or another. The rainbow-haired, androgynous Regressive Left Army is closing in.

  2. Proudly Unaffiliated says:

    Michael Moore is suffering from an advanced case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. His situation is dire indeed– as demonstrated by his unhinged zombie-like actions/comments to infect and propagate this virulent social disease to others. He needs professional help and a weight loss program.

  3. Pingback: Gotta ask the boss. | @the_arv

  4. coloradomtnman says:

    ‘most recent ex-wife.’ Now that’s funny!

  5. earlthomas786 says:

    Any more proof most men are living in a mamacracy?

  6. Damn Crackers says:

    Great. Another reason not to get married…and, isolated loners never are mass murderers.

    When is the gov’t going to make citizens register their girlfriends to the state?

  7. Gunner Q says:

    I bet the Left would handle gun ownership the way they handle marriage: You have a sacred and inviolate right to own a gun… unless you might possibly be misusing that right and then your wife can take your guns away and shoot you with them preemptively while the authorities cheer her on. You have to be a RESPONSIBLE gun owner, dangit! And that means using your guns ONLY to keep your wife safe! We don’t let you own guns for YOUR benefit! STOP having so much FUN! It makes you look like DONALD TRUMP OMG I’M SO TRIGGERED KILL KILL KILL!!!!

  8. DrTorch says:

    “serious solution from the left” That’s an oxymoron.

    Oh it’s serious that we have to deal with such people, and Prov 19:29 and 26:3 instruct the proper way. But the effeminate church has been too cowardly to do this for the past 200 years, and the results speak for themselves.

    Now we’re getting a 40′ statue of a nude woman for public viewing at the nation’s capital. Any question that we’re a pagan country now? I assume Ashera poles are next.

    Anyway, just a rant about the cowardice of the US Christian church over the past several decades. I don’t know why anyone would suggest that Wilson, Beyley, Piper, MacArthur or even Finney (with his adherence to Sylvester Graham) have any authority in Christian matters. Instead I’d suggest that Ezek 34 and 2 Peter 2 are appropriate scriptures for this lot.

  9. Uncle Silas says:

    The elite believe left-wing authoritarianism and, subsequently, totalitarianism will keep the working and middle classes properly docile. However, globalism, multiculturalism, immigration, and an unsustainable entitlement state (acccording to the CBO the debt will be $30 trillion by 2027) argue otherwise. Dissolution and partition are America’s future. Two things are guaranteed to speed this process – the abolition of the Electoral College and the destruction of the Second Amendment.

  10. Frank K says:

    When is the gov’t going to make citizens register their girlfriends to the state?

    I suspect that common law marriage will be coming back. Of course, this will have unintended consequences, as secular men will avoid cohabitation as much as they are now avoiding marriage. Sure, they’ll still sleep with their girlfriends; they just won’t live with them. After the do the deed, they’ll get dressed and go home. At least the smart ones will.

  11. feministhater says:

    Soon men will be required to get their wife’s or GF’s permission to take a piss, to leave the house, to drive a car or to enter a voting booth. Why do they even allow men to vote anymore, it’s obvious that women already know what’s good for them anyway?

  12. feministhater says:

    Moore’s plan does not require waivers for single men who are loners and shun relationships who want to buy guns.

    And then they’ll wonder why men won’t get married or have girlfriends even more than they do now. It’s as if they don’t understand the laws of unintended consequences…. oh no wait, they do, they really, really do.

  13. AnonS says:

    Local mega church had a small group listing for a ‘radical men’s mentoring group’ that I emailed for more information about. This church is non-dom but quite conservative for the area; forbids female teachers and gives lip service to submission when it comes up.

    The ‘radical men’s mentoring group’ send out an email that required the married men to get a signed permission slip from their wives in order to attend. I replied that I was no longer interested.

  14. Frank K says:

    The ‘radical men’s mentoring group’ send out an email that required the married men to get a signed permission slip from their wives in order to attend.

    Sounds like a Churchian group. Seems that is becoming par for the course in the non-dom world. I’ll bet that comparable church groups for the ladies do not require signed permission slips from hubby.

  15. Jim says:

    And then they’ll wonder why men won’t get married or have girlfriends even more than they do now. It’s as if they don’t understand the laws of unintended consequences…. oh no wait, they do, they really, really do.

    Yup. They just make it more and more intolerable to marry or even live with a cunt. But, nah, feministhater you just can’t get laid! You live in mommy’s basement! You’re gay! You hate women! Just learn game! (/sarc) Blah, blah, blah.

    BTW, it’s funny how many of these so-called “alphas” sound like women isn’t it? These two groups of idiots just can’t get it through their thick heads that MGTOW is about cost/benefit analysis. The juice is just not worth the squeeze. Some men don’t want their lives totally annihilated. How hard a concept is this to grasp? I personally know a former PUA in real life who became MGTOW (I know plenty online). Many MGTOWs are just formerly married guys who got fucked over by their cunty ex-wives. Some, like me, learned to not jump off the cliff before waiting to see if you’re killed once you reach the bottom.

    A man as ZERO rights in his own home. Hell, according to the courts it’s not even his it’s his wife’s! And his kids? They’re property of the mother, the man’s is just a human wallet. This isn’t hard people. False rape accusations, false DV and child molestation accusations, divorce rape…I mean fuck! Don’t these people get it yet? This isn’t hard people. Looking for NAWALT is like winning the lottery. It’s one in a million+ chance. And I don’t play the lottery. Like marriage it’s just not worth it.

    This Michael Moore fag is just yet another attempt at telling men how stupid and irresponsible they are while telling women how incredible and perfect they are. Us men are so stupid that we need some cunt’s permission to buy a gun according to him? Never mind that it was a MAN who INVENTED the damned thing, like just about everything else! Although I will say that men are still stupid enough to get married, the one thing they should not be encouraging yet think men are somehow worth less if they’re not. Yeah, ok.

    If Moore or any other fag thinks shaming is going to change our minds they’re only fooling themselves. Try ending your gynocentric bullshit and fix the fucking laws already if you’re so concerned! If not, sit down, shut up and stop bitching about MGTOWs growth because it’s only only going to grow larger the more oppressive these misandric laws get.

  16. Frank K says:

    The headline from the CNS article made me laugh:

    Michael Moore’s Gun Control Amendment Discriminates Against All Males, Including Gay Men

    Stop the presses! We can’t allow this outrage …. wait … you say that homosexuals will be exempted? Well, in that case, never mind. Then we are 100% behind it.

  17. VFM #7916 says:

    I forsee a large number of women flocking to men who have guns under passage of this amendment. It will be a “non-cuck” stamp of approval.

    Further, it’ll continue to weed out Cuckservatives and pajama boy democrats from the gene pool.

    I don’t think Moore wants what he’s gonna get. It’s no different than his predictions that Trump would win the presidency.

  18. Frank K says:

    Looking for NAWALT is like winning the lottery. It’s one in a million+ chance. And I don’t play the lottery. Like marriage it’s just not worth it.

    At least when you buy a lottery ticket you’re only out a couple of bucks. If you lose the in the NAWALT game you lose a whole lot more than that.

  19. Anon says:

    Unfortunately, this is precisely the correct way to get millions of cuckservatives enthusiastic about gun control. A cuckservative will happily jettison any and all other principles when the prospect of obeying a woman’s commands presents itself.

    This is indeed the fastest way to enact new leftism.

  20. earlthomas786 says:

    I wonder if the major pagan societies as they became more decadant and degenerate…the women started to rule the men. Even the men were ok with it because they got fat and happy
    Perhaps a history buff would know.

    We may be seeing history repeat itself when great empires go down.

  21. DeathWriter says:

    IF it was up to him.

    I would have to ask my wife to fart and take a crap too right?

  22. Pingback: Gotta ask the boss. | Reaction Times

  23. Damn Crackers says:

    @Earl

    -The old mythologer would seem to have been right in uniting Ares and Aphrodite, for all warlike races are prone to the love either of men or of women. This was exemplified among the Spartans in the days of their greatness; many things were managed by their women. But what difference does it make whether women rule, or the rulers are ruled by women? The result is the same. Even in regard to courage, which is of no use in daily life, and is needed only in war, the influence of the Lacedaemonian women has been most mischievous. The evil showed itself in the Theban invasion, when, unlike the women other cities, they were utterly useless and caused more confusion than the enemy. This license of the Lacedaemonian women existed from the earliest times, and was only what might be expected.

    Aristotle on Spartan Women – Politics, Book 2

  24. feeriker says:

    A cuckservative will happily jettison any and all other principles when the prospect of obeying a woman’s commands presents itself.

    The problem with this statement is that it implies that cuckservatives actually have principles. I’ve seen ZE-RO evidence of this being true.

  25. honeycomb says:

    Will we get the same ammendment for abortion?

    I’ll hold my breathe .. NOT!

    ..
    ..

    I don’t take direction on life or death issues from abortions supporters

  26. feeriker says:

    I wonder if the major pagan societies as they became more decadant and degenerate…the women started to rule the men. Even the men were ok with it because they got fat and happy

    Using the Western Roman Empire as an historical antecedent, the answer is yes, that’s exactly what happened (and no, despite the Emperor Constantine’s faux “conversion” and subsequent fiat that Rome was a “Christian” nation, the empire was in practice never anything other than pagan).

    We may be seeing history repeat itself when great empires go down.

    Absolutely. To paraphrase an old, but completely accurate cliché: the one thing we humans inevitably and consistently learn from history is that we never learn from history. Even animals have enough innate sense to avoid repeating mistakes that almost got them killed. What excuse do humans have?

  27. Anon says:

    The problem with this statement is that it implies that cuckservatives actually have principles. I’ve seen ZE-RO evidence of this being true.

    Yes, maybe those are not principles, but just what they claim to value :

    i) Small government
    ii) Personal accountability
    iii) Gun control

    In reality, these could be toppled tomorrow if the left decides to find a way to make any of those something that will be removed if a woman disapproves. Hence, Michael Moore’s idea will in fact work if implemented, as he has (by accident) found the fastest way to get a cuckservative to cave and switch sides.

  28. Jeff Strand says:

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t the official stats show that women commit as much domestic violence as men do?

  29. Anchorman says:

    Dang.

    Trump’s going to get a third term, isn’t he?

  30. RagingBeta says:

    @Earl Thomas786. There’s a verse in the OT ( I forget the reference) that says something along the lines of “in those days women and children will rule them”. That’s a paraphrase, but I believe it had to do with the degeneracy of Israel. That’s exactly what we’re having here.

    [D: Good point. I added Isaiah 3:12 to the beginning of the post.]

  31. Iowa Slim says:

    “The ‘radical men’s mentoring group’ send out an email that required the married men to get a signed permission slip from their wives in order to attend…”

    Are you friggin’ kidding me? The Churchians are boldly rubbing the men’s noses in it these days, aren’t they?

  32. Anon says:

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t the official stats show that women commit as much domestic violence as men do?

    Yes. And women receive vastly lower sentences for the same crime too.

    But no one cares about that. Least of all cuckservative men.

  33. Anonymous Reader says:

    Most people don’t know what is involved in amending the US Constitution. That’s why dunces like Mike Moore throw around such ideas; free publicity as they strike a “I’m Doing Something!” pose, but zero actual work / cost will be needed. Because it’s just empty noise that won’t go anywhere.

    From memory: an Amendment must pass both houses of Congress. Then it goes to the various States for possible ratification. It must be ratified by a supermajority both in Congress and States.

    This is grandstanding. Nothing more.

  34. Gunner Q says:

    earlthomas786 @ 12:39 pm:
    “I wonder if the major pagan societies as they became more decadent and degenerate…the women started to rule the men.”

    It’s hard to say because disease and trade patterns could end a nation overnight for most of history. “Successful society” generally meant “enough food”. Even today, plenty enough nations are impoverished from the greed and pride of their rulers or the lawlessness of their people rather than female appeasement. Original Sin isn’t the only way to go FUBAR; abolishing private property is a good one, too.

    “The ‘radical men’s mentoring group’ send out an email that required the married men to get a signed permission slip from their wives in order to attend…”

    If the rest of the church leadership didn’t excommunicate those responsible for this policy then they’re as useless as any other cuck. Ordering a husband to get his wife’s permission for a church activity violates just about everything God has to say about men & women in the Church.

  35. Patrick Albanese says:

    Can a man marry a woman who owns a gun, or does he have to get his ex wife’s permission for that too?

  36. Anonymous Reader says:

    Can a man marry a woman who owns a gun, or does he have to get his ex wife’s permission for that too?

    Only if she’s a ninja assassin.

  37. Dalrock says:

    @Anons

    The ‘radical men’s mentoring group’ send out an email that required the married men to get a signed permission slip from their wives in order to attend. I replied that I was no longer interested.

    Any chance they have this permission slip linked on their website?

    To get a sense of the scope of the crossdressing they are engaged in, imagine if their view of headship were reversed (to the biblical order) and they had a permission slip for wives to have their husband sign.

  38. feeriker says:

    Most people don’t know what is involved in amending the US Constitution.

    It doesn’t matter, since no one pays any attention to the damned thing anyway.

    Ordering a husband to get his wife’s permission for a church activity violates just about everything God has to say about men & women in the Church.

    Since when have churchians ever been concerned with what God has to say about anything, especially if it clashes with the FI and the culture?

  39. Robert What? says:

    Well since most mass shootings in recent years have been associated with Leftists and Jihadists, I think we’d get better results if we banned guns for Democrats and Muslims.

  40. Jonadab-the-Rechabite says:

    I hear men say “got to ask the boss” regularly, referring to their wife. It is common as pepperoni on pizza. They usually laugh at their own degree of being p-whipped and that without much p. Back when I was selling home-improvements it was rare to hear a husband voice his decision to purchase or not, always “we” or “the boss”. The most sucsessful in home sales pros, practically ignore the husband save for a few quips and engage the wife with what’s in it for her. Happy boss happy servant (servant leader of course.)

  41. Darwinian Arminian says:

    Moore’s proposed amendment would include a provision to make a man get permission from his wife or girlfriend before buying a gun.

    Even if the government somehow realized that this would create yet another disincentive for men to get married (big if, I know) wouldn’t this be pretty easy to circumvent? I’m reminded of a post that was once up at the late, lamented “University of Man” blog where one of the professors wrote about how he had wanted to get a vasectomy so that he wouldn’t have to worry about any “unplanned” pregnancies. Unfortunately, most doctors refuse to perform this service for single men and will only do so for married men if their wife signs off on the decision. So he solved his problem by getting one of his fuck-buddies who was also a single mom to join him at the clinic with her kids, pose as his wife, and give her assent in person so that her “husband” could have his procedure. Problem solved! Now why not take the same approach when I want to go buy myself an AR-15?

    If anything, this would open up some interesting new options for women hired out as escorts. Though the question to ask here is: If I paid a girl for her “services,” and then just had her accompany me while I went out to buy a gun before I returned her to her place of business without ever having sex with her, could the law still charge me with soliciting a prostitute?

  42. Frank K says:

    Back when I was selling home-improvements it was rare to hear a husband voice his decision to purchase or not, always “we” or “the boss”.

    A few years ago my wife got into her head that she wanted one of those $2000 cast iron Kirby vacuum cleaners. I shut that down and fast, even after the sales droid said he’d lower the price, just for us. I told him no freaking way and that he could leave. My wife pouted for a while, but she got over it.

    Another example. We had a broken window in a spare room, the inner pane was broken in an accident. Since it was in a unused room and it still kept the elements out, it was out of sight and out of mind. Until a slick door to door window vendor gave my wife an $800 quote to replace the whole window. Again, I told her she was being ripped off. I then removed the sash, took it to a local glass shop where I had both panes replaced with low E glass for about $130.

  43. Oleaginous Outrager says:

    “90% of gun violence is committed by men”

    Men of which ethnic groups, hmmm? Would they need “permission” from their baby mamas to get a gun? Oh wait, the groups that commit most of the “gun violence” are already acquiring their weapons illegally! But it’s racist to mention that, and besides, they mostly only kill in ones and twos, and mostly only each other, so Moore can still sleep soundly even with that knowledge.

  44. Tarl says:

    We need an amendment that fatbodies like Moore need a woman’s permission before they can eat a donut.

  45. SnapperTrx says:

    “Happy boss happy servant (servant leader of course.)”

    Bwa ha ha! I almost shot my Rockstar out of my nose……

  46. @Oleaginous Outrager:

    The more fun trick is to go with “Democrats shouldn’t be allowed to have guns”. That one normally gets their heads so far in a not they’ll start calling you some random insult.

  47. @Darwinian Arminian:

    I’ve seen reports of paid fake girlfriends out of China (110:100 Male:Female ratio, I believe in certain cohorts) as a way of showing off to parents. They aren’t escorts; just actors coming for dinner.

    Where there’s a desire, there is a market. Where there’s a market? Someone will find a way to capitalize on it.

  48. Opus says:

    Last night returning on the train from London I found myself sitting next to a young woman who on her lap-top was – as I could see – writing an essay on the British Constitution. The heading said that Britain had a Constitutional Democratic Monarchy; What nonsense they teach people today at University, I thought.

    No one ever came up with the idea that Britain had a constitution until Walter Begehot in 1868 wrote a book entitled the English Constitution. In other words Britain does not have a constitution and I maintain that such can only exist as with the United States when it enacts a written document. The problem with such constitutions are that they are subject to amendment which amendments may be repealed. This rather defeats the purpose of the Constitution.

    It strikes me therefore as somewhat ironic that Britain or rather its lawyers are responsible for the writing of many of the worlds constitutions namely those that we so generously prepared for those of our Empires former colonies at independence.

  49. Greg says:

    MOLON LABE!
    MOLON LABE!
    MOLON LABE!

  50. Jason says:

    Opus…..at the founding of the United States……its astounding how “blessed” we were by Empire in royal charters, defense, expenditure, many already established institutions of high learning (Harvard, William & Mary, Union College for just a few examples). Also a very “literate” populace for the times…..public schooling was already compulsory for the primary grades in the “dominion of new england” and many of the southern colonies including Virginia, Maryland, and North Carolina. The principles of “saint or sinner, all must be able to write and write”

    The colonies were also established in a uniform language and many customs.

    The fathers and faces of the American Revolutionary War were very well versed in enlightenment philosophy of governance, principle and practice. The exact reasons and causes for the revolution are very numerous….and can be debated or discussed at another time!

    Where I grew in New York State it was about 30 minutes from where ol’ General Burgoyne surrendered in 1777 (Battle of Saratoga). Supposedly the “turning point of the war” but I don’t know about that…..my area of New York State saw more action and was much more important during the “French and Indian War” or in The UK you probably call it “The Seven Years War” 🙂

  51. Oscar says:

    OT: Number of vasectomies plunges amid fears relationships won’t last

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/05/number-vasectomies-plunges-amid-fears-relationships-wont-last/

    “Sexual health experts said men were increasingly waiting until they are older to start families, or avoiding the procedure in case relationships failed and they wanted to have more children later in life.”

    That’s in the UK. I wonder if something similar is happening elsewhere.

  52. Jason says:

    In California depending on your health plan or HMO…..married men have to get their wife’s “permission” to get one, or she has to be made aware of “his” choice. Yet that man’s teenage daughter can have an abortion without him ever knowing about it.

    I had mine at 40. Not because I am a player but I had really zero options, and none coming. I also decided that IF I did ever get married, we would adopt and I was going to have to play the step-dad role more than likely…………or her children would be at the age when they were making those first steps of “leaving” the house.

    I also just didn’t want to be a first time dad at 40, 43, 45, 47.

    The one nurse at the clinic DID try to talk me out of it. She flattered me “You’re a handsome man, you have a lot to offer a woman, this is a serious choice!”

    It was a serious choice, and one I stand by. Is it right for everyone? Probably not……..but “she’s the boss” and so goes California, so goes the nation in many ways. Married men sooner than later will need the permission of their wife for this “reproductive choice”

  53. AnonS says:

    @Dalrock

    Any chance they have this permission slip linked on their website?

    To get a sense of the scope of the crossdressing they are engaged in, imagine if their view of headship were reversed (to the biblical order) and they had a permission slip for wives to have their husband sign.

    I’ll copy the email and “Men’s Radical Mentoring Mentee Covenant”

    Email, only had the one line but it was enough for me to raise red flags.

    First, you are to be commended for seeing the value for you as a participant in our Men’s Radical Mentoring program. This is a unique church experience for the few who sincerely want to be the best they can be as men, husbands, sons, fathers, providers, church leaders, and – in general – the best they can be as followers of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

    What we are talking about is a limited time learning experience of about 9 months with a small group of highly motivated men who will be shepherded by a more senior, mature Christian man who has travelled the road less travelled and been through many of life’s experiences just as you will probably do during your lifetime. And being able to discuss life’s issues with your peers in a group setting completes the educational experience.

    This experience is not named “Radical Mentoring” for no reason. Those involved will meet for several hours once a month and study many of life’s challenges from a Biblical perspective. Completion of homework assignments is a big part of our methodology. Typical of some of the topic areas we will be studying are:

    Exploring the Bible, Prayer, Marriage and Dating, Family Life, Disciple Making, Defending the Faith, Stewardship and the church, Church leadership, and a few other topics.

    Our teaching methods will include Scripture memory, Book reviews, Group discussion, Prayer, and Marriage assignments. And speaking of marriage, for those married your wife will be asked to “sign off” on allowing her husband to be a full functioning part of his mentoring group.

    “Men’s Radical Mentoring Mentee Covenant”. Didn’t open it until now but the last line is….

    I am hereby making a covenant to the following:

    I want to become an ‘all-in’ Christ follower, husband, father, son, brother, friend, disciple-maker.

    I understand that I will take direct, unfiltered feedback. I will do everything in my power to receive it in love and learn from it. I will avoid defensiveness, realizing that when I defend, I lose the opportunity to learn. I am committing to being open to examine myself—my personality, my past, my habits, my anger and my responses to people. I want to learn; I want to change, I want to be more like Jesus Christ in every fiber of my being.

    I understand that I am committing to attending every meeting, being there on time and to have my work done. No exceptions unless providentially hindered. We will lay out our schedule for the year at our first meeting and I will manage my other commitments around the dates that are scheduled.

    I am committing to the entire course and will finish strong!

    I understand that this mentoring process is based upon Jesus Christ, His message, and His plan for our lives. I want to grow in my faith.

    I further covenant that, at some time in the future, when the Lord lets me know that I am ready, that I will become a mentor and possibly even lead a group like this myself.

    I commit to total confidentiality. What is said in the group stays in the group. No exceptions.

    If married, I have discussed this with my wife and she fully supports my involvement. She willingly relinquishes the time that I will need to attend sessions and to do the readings and homework, with the goal of becoming a godlier husband and father.

    ___________________________________ ____________________________________
    Mentee Name Your signature

    _____________________________________
    If married, your wife’s signature

  54. Scott says:

    I hear men say “got to ask the boss” regularly, referring to their wife. It is common as pepperoni on pizza. They usually laugh at their own degree of being p-whipped and that without much p. Back when I was selling home-improvements it was rare to hear a husband voice his decision to purchase or not, always “we” or “the boss”. The most sucsessful in home sales pros, practically ignore the husband save for a few quips and engage the wife with what’s in it for her. Happy boss happy servant (servant leader of course.)

    Yep. It’s not even a thing anymore. I am around so many men at work, church, etc who talk like this that I now pretty much don’t engage anymore.

  55. cunt says:

    Michael Moore is just pandering to his most fervent supporters; over-weight, feminist cat ladies.

  56. Frank K says:

    If the rest of the church leadership didn’t excommunicate those responsible for this policy then they’re as useless as any other cuck.

    I’ve said this before, but I’ll say it again: being “excommunicated” isn’t the same as being disfellowed. All it means is that you are not allowed to receive communion.

  57. Scott says:

    Frank K

    Kind of topic but your point is a good one.

    I’ve kearned so much about canon law since becoming Orthodox.

    Did you know that if you miss liturgy 3 Times in a row you have excommunicated yourself and are required to go to confrsssion?

  58. m11nine says:

  59. Frank K says:

    Scott – My understanding in the RCC is that one unexcused failure to attend on Sunday is enough to need absolution.

  60. Joel W says:

    Take it away all you want. This is my license to carry and to defend myself and loved ones, or anybody who may need it:

    Luke 22:36
    Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

    When man’s law is in violation of the Most High’s law, I know which one I follow.

  61. Mark says:

    @Dalrock

    Michael Moore is an imbecile! I cannot stand the sight of the fat,ugly f***. We do have stricter laws here in Canada concerning ownership of firearms.But,it is the legal,law abiding owners that pay the price for our draconian laws.I have an FAC(Firearms Acquisition Certificate).When I got mine all you had to do was apply,have a background check done by the police and attend a 1 day class on firearms.No big deal.If you wanted a handgun then you have to apply for a “restricted weapons permit” on top of the FAC. Where the idiot laws come into play is in the storage.For example,my 12-gauge shotgun.It must secured with a trigger lock and stored in a locked firearms storage locker and ammunition must be locked away in another room separate from the gun….wtf? So if you have a home invasion you do not have the time to get the gun?……wtf sense does that make!

    Also,what the bleeding heart liberal dems never tell you.There are more ILLEGAL firearms on the streets of Toronto than legal firearms in the city.We have shootings all the time.Not at the record of US cities but,99.9% of the time they are from illegal firearms.Another point that you will hear from your NRA(and they are correct)…..Toronto is the “home invasion capital of North America”…..You never hear the dem-tards mention this.The NRA rightfully and consistently points this out about Toronto.If you go out to Alberta you will see a lot more guns.Kind of a “wild west” mentality. Incidentally,there is a very large political party out there(can’t remember the name) that if ever voted in will leave Confederation and join the American Union with full Statehood. Most Canadians do not realize this.They get a lot of votes every election.

    I myself abide by the firearms laws that we have.But,I have a compound bow that I keep close by.If I ever encounter a home invader he will be getting a five point razor sharp titanium arrow right through him.Also,guns make too much noise.With the bow no one will ever here anything! This is a trick that I learned from other firearms owners.Pull out the arrow and drag the body out onto the street somewhere……or take it to the garbage dump where it belongs!

  62. Byzantine says:

    Mental in West intensifies….
    https://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.be/2017/10/she-was-lonely-so-she-made-her.html

    I am starting to wonder what was the true story behind Salem witch trials.

  63. Opus says:

    @Jason

    I was struck by your writing that education was compulsory in New England for children in the primary grades. In Old England such compulsion only existed after 1870!

  64. Luke says:

    I believe that Michael Moore is leftist enough that he is clearly a traitor to America and to the West, and I would happily watch him being burned alive. That said, give him credit for being one of the few liberals to accurately predict that Trump would stomp Felonia von Pantsuit in the 2016 election. Apparently, his beginnings included acquiring some genuine experience with working-class political mood trends. He simply chose long ago to betray them for 30 pieces of silver and praise from other traitors.

  65. RickyB says:

    Re: Anon and the mentee pledge

    The mentee pledge is from https://radicalmentoring.com/. I guess, in fairness, the wives are going to be asked to host a dinner and meet with the other wives of the men in the program. The leaders of the organization want to make sure they are part of the process and assume that, given the subservience of modern Christian men toward their wives, they wouldn’t stand a chance getting the level of participation they need without the buy-in from the women. One could give them the benefit of the doubt and say they are just being pragmatic.

    The real question is whether by the end of the program, the husbands are then given a pledge to start taking real biblical headship of their homes. That pledge should obviously have no place for the wife to sign.

  66. I would suggest that Mr. Moore needs someone else’s permission every time he wants to eat a hot dog.

  67. Jason says:

    In Colonial New England there was a strong educational ethic, puritanical in its own way that all should be able to read and write (you know……to read “The Bible”). In North Carolina, and Virginia early education was usually run from a “home” where the local children of the hamlet, shire or town came to learn to read. Usually that of a pastor or “called” person in Christian faith (usually Methodist after 1750). The colonial South did have “education” acts on the books since the early 1700’s and this region was sparsely populated compared to New England, and the mid-Atlantic seaboard (New York City, Newark, Philadelphia, Trenton).

    I personally think the “distance” from The Crown encouraged this. If the thirteen colonies had been in Bedforshire instead of across the Atlantic……things may have been very different.

  68. That this idea would ever be a serious consideration speaks volumes about how masculine gender-loathing has become endemic in western culture. I get that Michael Moore is a self-inflicted cuck, but all I’m seeing in the wake of the Vegas shooting is less about gun control and more about male control.

    It’s no longer about categorizing masculinity as “toxic” or “hyper” – that narrative is officially dropped after this shooting. Now ANY masculinity is a threat, ANY expression of conventional masculinity is the true problem. Suggesting that a woman’s oversight and discernment should be necessary for a man to have access to a civil right only further reinforces what I’ve been saying for some time now – only the feminine is ‘correct’ in any social discourse. Only the feminine is legitimate in exercising judgement, educating new generations and deciding which man will breed and which will not.

    Think about this; what’s being suggested is that men be denied a right that only women should legitimately have. For all the fallacious blathering of women in pink pussy hats about how they think they’re losing rights today, here we have an actual right of men being denied by women, by the Feminine Imperative.

  69. melmoth says:

    Jonadab,

    “being p-whipped and that without much p.”

    That’s the saddest thing of all. Not to mention that the p-owner is fat/unhealthy/walled out 98 times out of 100 anyway. These guys are p-whipped by 2s, 3s and 4s. 5s if they’re lucky. I’ve never married but the idea of being servile and p-whipped to a wife who you wouldn’t even want to see naked is so lifeless. If a 20 year old Sofia Vergara insists that I go curtain shopping with her all afternoon before she blows my mind that night, then, well, okay dear.

    That’s one thing I’ve noticed lately in gender related writings/talks. There is this standard acceptance that women maintain sexual power and that men will always capitulate to our sexually marvelous better halves. When they withhold the lingerie show for a day or two, the men will immediately kowtow. That’s how the battle of the sexes goes. That golden vaj runs the show. And women are sooo beautiful. What can we do? There is this across the board acknowledgement that women are such sexual dynamos that men can’t really confront that. That’s how it plays out in written theorizing at least. How about real life? Outside of college-aged couples here and there (still not common), I almost never see a woman post 25 whose sexual clout is anywhere near this kind of golden rule of females as sexual powerhouses who cannot be denied.

  70. Consider also that in the US a man must seek his wife’s approval to get a vasectomy and her permission to transfer his retirement funds to another account.

  71. melmoth says:

    I don’t understand why the left wants to ban guns if it’s a rape culture. Shouldn’t women have the right to arm themselves if they have a daily 1 in 3 chance of being raped?

  72. Gunner Q says:

    RickyB @ 6:24 am:
    “The leaders of the organization want to make sure they are part of the process and assume that, given the subservience of modern Christian men toward their wives, they wouldn’t stand a chance getting the level of participation they need without the buy-in from the women.”

    Of course they have a reason for disobeying Scripture. That’s why they disobey Scripture. Nobody does it purely to attract the wrath of God.

    Good find!

    Mark @ 12:48 am:
    “But,I have a compound bow that I keep close by.If I ever encounter a home invader he will be getting a five point razor sharp titanium arrow right through him.Also,guns make too much noise.With the bow no one will ever here anything! This is a trick that I learned from other firearms owners.Pull out the arrow and drag the body out onto the street somewhere……or take it to the garbage dump where it belongs!”

    There’s so much wrong here that I have to comment. Bows have a minimum range of arm length plus arrow length; very bad for indoor use. You don’t have a hand free for lights or doors, either. The bow itself is silent but your target won’t be; arrows don’t cause the impact trauma that bullets do, especially multi-points designed to kill through blood loss. That provides lots of time to scream and makes an impressive blood trail to your front door after moving the body.

    Better to keep a sharpened file or claw hammer next to your bed. An “improvised” deadly weapon is much easier to defend using in court than a knife, gun or bow. Then you don’t have to fear the cops for the rest of your life.

  73. Mark says:

    @Gunner

    “”Bows have a minimum range of arm length plus arrow length; very bad for indoor use. You don’t have a hand free for lights or doors, either. The bow itself is silent but your target won’t be; arrows don’t cause the impact trauma that bullets do,””

    I totally agree.It all comes down to our laws.Shoot a home invader with a bow and you will get “assault with a deadly weapon”….same as a hammer.Shoot him with a shot gun?…..manslaughter,illegal firearm storage,discharging a firearm etc.etc. The bow is good for about 40 yards,I know that.But,our laws are draconian.This is just a way around them.Actually,the proper way to deal with this,according to authorities,is “call the police and wait for them”. My attitude is this….”I would not call those f*****g bums to take out my garbage”…..Therefore,I will take my chances.

  74. feeriker says:

    It all comes down to our laws.Shoot a home invader with a bow and you will get “assault with a deadly weapon”….same as a hammer.Shoot him with a shot gun?…..manslaughter,illegal firearm storage,discharging a firearm etc.etc. The bow is good for about 40 yards,I know that.But,our laws are draconian.This is just a way around them.Actually,the proper way to deal with this,according to authorities,is “call the police and wait for them”. My attitude is this….”I would not call those f*****g bums to take out my garbage”…..Therefore,I will take my chances.

    This is why, in the event of a home invasion, you KILL (not frighten, not stun, not disable) with whatever weapon is most readily at hand. THEN you dispose of the remains. How and where really depends on where you live and what terrain is available where no one will find the remains until many years have passed, if ever (I live in the Southern Arizona desert where there’s LOTS of open land that no one ever sets foot on, so perhaps I’m at an unfair advantage should this contingency ever arise).

    Anyway, the point is that 1) DO NOT EVER involve “law enforcement” unless you have a desire to end your life as you’ve always known it; 2) make sure you have plenty of 55-gallon contractor trash bags on hand, along with several pounds of quick lime, a circular saw, and a good shovel. and 3) be prepared to do the clean up alone, unless you have a spouse, family, or close friends of like mind who aren’t squeamish about self-defense and the responsibilities and outcomes it will possibly (if unfortunately) entail.

    The “Three Esses:” Shoot, shovel, and shut up.

  75. Gunner Q says:

    “But,our laws are draconian.This is just a way around them.Actually,the proper way to deal with this,according to authorities,is “call the police and wait for them”. My attitude is this….”I would not call those f*****g bums to take out my garbage”…..Therefore,I will take my chances.”

    As a Californian, I totally understand. Although here, not using an assault weapon makes the district attorney lose interest in prosecuting you. Fileman doesn’t grab headlines like gunman. Liberals are weird like that, always watching who’s watching.

    Then again, maybe it’s just Hollywood’s influence. Californians do it on camera.

  76. Mark says:

    @feeriker

    “”This is why, in the event of a home invasion, you KILL (not frighten, not stun, not disable) with whatever weapon is most readily at hand. THEN you dispose of the remains.””

    This is the what I learned when I used to shoot skeet & trap from other shooters.Hence,the reason for the bow.No noise……except for the idiot with an arrow in him.

    “”DO NOT EVER involve “law enforcement” unless you have a desire to end your life as you’ve always known it;””

    Correct!….I would not trust those motherf*****s for any reason! They are not my friends.They are thugs with a gun who want to cause as much trouble for you as possible.

    “”The “Three Esses:” Shoot, shovel, and shut up.””

    I will remember this! Thanks!

  77. Kevin says:

    “Gotta ask the boss” is one of those phrases men say that if they said “I am a big pussy” it would have the exact same effect on my brain. I know it’s said in good humor but it’s just so demeaning. Women also never say it even in jest.

  78. feeriker says:

    I would not trust those motherf*****s for any reason! They are not my friends.They are thugs with a gun who want to cause as much trouble for you as possible.

    This has been so obvious for at least the last two decades that I cannot BELIEVE that anyone with an IQ above freezer temperature who has been paying any attention to their surroundings could still consider these predatory douchebags to be “heroes.” Methinks the problem is that an insufficient number of WASPs have yet to be violated by these thugscum swine*. Once that changes maybe some eyes will open and [what used to be known as] common sense will reassert itself. I’m not optimistic, though.

    (* This category also includes the uniformed military – unless a majority of them do the right thing and not only refuse to obey any order to impose martial law, but actively side with the people to take down the tyranny that currently rules us.)

  79. Jason says:

    I am polite and respectful to police when I have to deal with them. Which is rare. I hide my general contempt that I have for most of them. Their Union and “Officers Association” here in my city and California openly backed and helped fund Hillary Clinton for president. There was a huge billboard here on I-5 that showed a bunch of “good looking / hot” cops “standing behind” Hillary Clinton saying “We’re With Her!” emblazoned at the masthead.

    It was funded by their Union and the statewide “peace officers association”

    For the most part, the police in my city don’t stop, or even try to prevent crime. They come with their vans, buses, tanks, occupying force AFTER the bloodshed and clean up the mess of dead bodies…..

    After my arrest in 2008 for “assaulting a peace officer” (I didn’t), my trust of them in general was gone, and the punk cop who did “file” the charges on me couldn’t even show his face and bother to show up at my arraignment. Charges dropped. Thankfully the Judge saw through this charade (and maybe the Judge having a very ethnic Polish last name like mine helped….who knows!)

  80. Frank K says:

    I totally agree.It all comes down to our laws.Shoot a home invader with a bow and you will get “assault with a deadly weapon

    Not in the Centennial State:

    “…any occupant of a dwelling is justified in using any degree of physical force, including deadly physical force, against another person when that other person has made an unlawful entry into the dwelling, and when the occupant has a reasonable belief that such other person has committed a crime in the dwelling in addition to the uninvited entry, or is committing or intends to commit a crime against a person or property in addition to the uninvited entry, and when the occupant reasonably believes that such other person might use any physical force, no matter how slight, against any occupant.”

  81. American says:

    Michael Moore should be focusing on losing that extra 150 pounds of lard he’s hauling around before he has a massive heart attack thereby freeing the world of his destructive and undesirable leftardism.

    On a postive note, watch this to learn why Michael Moore’s entire worldview is flawed and dangerous to humans: https://youtu.be/wLoG9zBvvLQ

  82. Anon says:

    Michael Moore should be focusing on losing that extra 150 pounds of lard he’s hauling around before he has a massive heart attack thereby freeing the world of his destructive and undesirable leftardism.

    Remember that Manboobz Futrelle desperately wants to be Michael Moore. His days are spent whining :

    “If Michael Moore makes money, and even managed to be married for a bit, why not meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee????”.

  83. Boxer says:

    Remember that Manboobz Futrelle desperately wants to be Michael Moore.

    Let us never forget that Michael Moore got fucked over by his wife in divorce court, to the tune of tens of millions of dollars.

    https://v5k2c2.wordpress.com/2017/04/28/more-kooky-alex-jones/

    Note the photograph of the boobless, barren, ugly pig who rode his coattails into the realm of the super rich. One has to be the weakest of cucks to not take the red pill after such a savage whipping by such an inferior female.

    Boxer

  84. Oscar says:

    @ Boxer

    “One has to be the weakest of cucks to not take the red pill after such a savage whipping by such an inferior female.”

    What’s Moore supposed to do; change his shtick now? It made him a famous, influential multimillionaire.

  85. Anon says:

    I don’t expect Michael Moore to change his tune. He has his brand.

    The funny thing is that this episode did not make Manboobz Futrelle become red pill (or at least discontinue his mangina blog). Michael Moore is Manboobz Futrelle’s idol.

  86. Opus says:

    If I may consider further the subject of compulsory education.

    1870 is very recent. My grandparents were born shortly after the passing of the Act of 1870. The Act nevertheless excluded certain children from attendance at school – those who were in work (!) and those who lived too far away from the nearest school such that attendance would be impossible or at least extremely onerous. The Act makes no distinction as to sex and so the next time some dim-witted Feminist or Male Feminist waxes lyrical as to oppression of women and names education as evidence of this you will be able to demonstrate that not only was there equality of the sexes amongst children aged between five and ten but that until 1870 most people received no formal education. Education is expensive and frequently without point.

    America was and is, for better or worse, more advanced. I was therefore somewhat struck by a Lucille Ball, Desi Arnez flick from 1940 Too Many Girls which is set in a University in New Mexico, and where there seemed to be just as many women as men. This must have been the norm but such a movie set in a University in England in 1940 would have seemed implausible which I presume is not the case with Too Many Girls.

    How I would love to visit, in my Tardis, Colonial America.

  87. Opus says:

    May I add as Jason referred to the Seven Years War that most people in England would have no idea to what that might refer or that more specifically we were In North America fighting (inter alia) the Indians – I read recently that Times columnist David Aaronvitch’s two Cambridge educated daughters and both students in History at that had never heard of Dunkirk (!) so you see how it is – though most have heard of General Wolfe. What amazes me is that when I was very young a popular song of the time which reached Number 2 in the charts as performed by Mr Lonnie Donegan entitled The Battle of New Orleans described the somewhat embarrassing 1815 British defeat – 1815 being otherwise quite good year for our Army. If we are indifferent to your Revolutionary War it must be because we see America as having like a favoured son who despite youthful petulance has turned out quite well and we like a parent are proud of what our offspring has achieved – that’s my boy.

  88. Norvis says:

    Being 1. Canadian 2. Married and 3. A gun owner I can confirm that one does not need a spouses permission to purchase a gun. My wife did sign the form for my Possession and Acquisition License but any gun purchased under said license did not require her legal approval in order to purchase the gun.

  89. Otto Lamp says:

    @Norvis,

    So, you needed your wife’s permission to get you license?

    If not, why did she sign the form?

  90. Jason says:

    Opus! Right on!

    I was reading the memoirs of John Adams, and the infamous formal audience meeting of him and King George III a few years after the Treaty of Paris (1781). It was an awkward moment for them both. The bloodshed between a former colony, and Crown. The Empire that “birthed” them, gave them their language, many of their mannerisms, much of their traditions; and the unsure new nation that was still viewed by many in England as a “colony” that would flounder, fail or come begging back to the Empire for defense, help or eventual reunification……….

    The way Adams describes King George III, as an American……you feel for King George III and his position he was in after the surrender…..and it would take probably over 100 years for the relationship to fully heal (World War I more than likely) between the two nations. Yes, there was trade, yes there was that “other” war (1812), then a slow, long process of healing between the two nations………

    Look, in the USA today……9 out of 10 high schoolers think “Health Care” is a right “guaranteed” by the Constitution. 40% of Californians finishing high school can’t even read at “a fourth grade level” but they all know how to put condoms on. American teachers also claim they put in 110% every day (we know this to be a crock).

    My parents were both immigrants. My father came to the USA in 1946 from Poland as a nine year old boy, and my mother arrived with The Beatles in 1964 at the age of nineteen. They both had a deep love for their “adoptive” nation. Despite my “Polish” last name, my mother did raise me in too many ways “culturally British” but always reminded me of the hope the USA was and is to the world, despite its problems……..

  91. Wibbins says:

    Hey dal, I felt you should check out this article about married women trying to tear down a young married woman that asked about what to make for her husbands lunch.

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/rendezview/when-making-a-sandwich-is-a-crime-against-feminism/news-story/966a541e2e1ffe7bd5f13047d483ef51

  92. Heidi says:

    @ Wibbins: A fine entry in the “Ugly Feminists” category. The unloving selfishness of the feminist commenters is so plain in the original exchange that practically everyone commenting on the Telegraph piece hurries to agree that making your husband lunch is a fine thing to do, whether feminist or not. Who wants to be publicly associated with such stinginess of love?

  93. Lost Patrol says:

    we like a parent are proud of what our offspring has achieved – that’s my boy.

    Dear Dad. Please don’t come for a visit right now, it is an inconvenient time and I do not wish to sully your opinion of how we turned out.

  94. earlthomas786 says:

    I felt you should check out this article about married women trying to tear down a young married woman that asked about what to make for her husbands lunch.

    Funny…in that story their rationale to not make him a sandwich is because they aren’t his mother. Well if that’s the case, a husband shouldn’t have to ask her for permission either when it comes to guns (or other things) because she isn’t his mother.

  95. What’s sad, is even after so much, sluts can still stick the landing.

    My younger sister, now 23, left home at 17-18 to date a trashy guy my parents didn’t approve of. Had various boyfriends, even was “bi” for a year, started dating thug black guys (according to her, one claimed he partook in a murder by stabbing.) Got pregnant, almost arranged an adoption, decided not to, luckily the baby turned out white because she cheated on the black guy.

    Annnndd now? She’s dating a guy about 27, 28, who used to work for the sheriff’s department, now works in construction. Guy’s about 5’10, 5’11, a tad overweight, drives a huge pickup truck with Molon Labe stickers on it and wants their relationship to be serious and headed towards marriage.

    Moral of the story? Yes, a slut with a high count who dated trash and even was a slut for black guys, single mom, can stick the landing.

  96. Spike says:

    Moore’s proposition fails on one basic premise: Criminals never ask for permission. They will obtain guns when and as it suits them.
    Mr Moore would best mind that Prohibition didn’t work for alcohol or drugs and should stick to what he does best: performing cheap stunts at the expense of crisis victims for an ever-dwindling audience of pie-in-the-sky Utopian idealists

  97. Dave says:

    Moral of the story? Yes, a slut with a high count who dated trash and even was a slut for black guys, single mom, can stick the landing.

    Ever stayed at a hotel where the only available source of food in the dead of the night was a crappy vending machine, and you’re so hungry you could eat an elephant?
    That is not as bad as what many western men experience when it comes to their women.
    No, slutty women are not sticking the landing; it’s the male thirst that’s unbearable.

    Looked another way, slutty women “gain” something on their chaste sisters: they have tons of experience with men, and know what to do, what to say and how to look, to arouse and keep men’s sexual interests.

  98. feeriker says:

    Annnndd now? She’s dating a guy about 27, 28, who used to work for the sheriff’s department, now works in construction. Guy’s about 5’10, 5’11, a tad overweight, drives a huge pickup truck with Molon Labe stickers on it and wants their relationship to be serious and headed towards marriage.

    Have you warned this poor sucker about what he’s getting himself into, or do you figure that the two of them deserve each other?

  99. earlthomas786 says:

    No, slutty women are not sticking the landing; it’s the male thirst that’s unbearable.

    I guess it depends on what the guy is thirsting for. If it is sex, based on her past it shouldn’t be hard for him to get it. The fact he wants to marry a woman with that type of past is concerning.

  100. feministhater says:

    Annnndd now? She’s dating a guy about 27, 28, who used to work for the sheriff’s department, now works in construction. Guy’s about 5’10, 5’11, a tad overweight, drives a huge pickup truck with Molon Labe stickers on it and wants their relationship to be serious and headed towards marriage.

    Let him do whatever he wants. Let him pick up the slack so the rest of us don’t have to. He will learn the hard way.

  101. feministhater says:

    No, slutty women are not sticking the landing; it’s the male thirst that’s unbearable.

    This is a good thing. There have to be those white knights who pick up the slack and pay for the tramps. We, we lonely few, get to live our lives free of all this shit. It’s a blessing. Only stupid men do stupid shit and you must let them learn the hard way.

  102. earlthomas786 says:

    Looked another way, slutty women “gain” something on their chaste sisters: they have tons of experience with men, and know what to do, what to say and how to look, to arouse and keep men’s sexual interests.

    Yeah they also know how to use a man and get them to do whatever they want too. At least with a chaste one you got a shot of them seeing you as a human instead of an ATM machine or an emotional punching bag.

  103. Jason says:

    grew up in a house full of guns……….my dad hunted…….also him growing up in “disarmed” Poland when the NAZIs rolled in; then the Soviets, the old man was very pro gun. The one gun cabinet at the top of the back stair in the house was always unlocked. As a kid it was understood that if I ever touched any of them….I would be “worse than dead” but if I ever wanted to use one, and I asked? Not a problem. Around the age of 16 or so I was told where the one handgun was. I am not a gun collector and I am not really “into” them but I am life NRA member and I *dam* well know how to use one, and respect it.

  104. earlthomas786 says:

    ‘Have you warned this poor sucker about what he’s getting himself into, or do you figure that the two of them deserve each other?’

    Would he even listen?

  105. Jason says:

    oh may I add…….”no one died” no one went on a “mass murder rampage” (because no one in the house was on psychotropic drugs like everyone is on today). One thing about all these folks who “go crazy” and murder…………..the media NEVER asks “How long was he on Paxil? (or any other inhibitor)”

    These drugs are DANGEROUS and we have a full generation of men since they were BOYS being force fed this and other mood enhancers (ADHD drugs and the like). The media will never ask these question. They will never question the safety of these drugs

  106. Oscar says:

    @ earlthomas786 says:
    October 9, 2017 at 8:52 am

    “Would he even listen?”

    Giving people the truth is our business. What they do with it is their business.

  107. feeriker says:

    “Would he even listen?”

    Most likely not. He’s probably one of those schlubs who has convinced himself that a slut brings “experience” to the relationship (and will be bewildered into anguish when she “dead bedrooms” him in short order). That, or he already knows all about her and has no intention of treating her as anything other than a short-term piece of ass.

  108. earlthomas786 says:

    Giving people the truth is our business. What they do with it is their business.

    Fair point.

  109. earlthomas786 says:

    Most likely not. He’s probably one of those schlubs who has convinced himself that a slut brings “experience” to the relationship

    Reminds me of one of Boxer’s older posts about single mothers and the tricks they do to try and hook a man….and then change once they do. I don’t doubt this is what actually happens.

    ‘Don’t date Single Moms’

    https://v5k2c2.wordpress.com/2014/08/01/dont-date-single-moms/

  110. Pingback: Male Control | The Rational Male

  111. justdoit says:

    Jason, Rollo and others:

    >>In California depending on your health plan or HMO…..married men have to get their wife’s “permission” to get one, or she has to be made aware of “his” choice. Yet that man’s teenage daughter can have an abortion without him ever knowing about it.

    Yet another example of “his body, her choice”. Well know about “my body, my choice” and how that applies only to women. There is also “a woman’s right to privacy” with respect to ehast she and her doctor decide to do about, well, just about anything. The husband has no such right, not even when it is solely about his own body.

  112. Girlfielf says:

    Michael Moore is merely the mouthpiece of yet an even larger woman.

  113. earl says:

    ‘well .. hmmmmm’

    Social scientists have told us that because married people monitor each other, they stay healthier. But single people exercise more than married people. On average, people became fatter after they got married.

    Main reason…free time. I can easily go an hour in the gym daily if I want to. It’s a lot easier to have a hobby and work on a craft too.

    I didn’t notice a man-woman split when it came to a happy single life. I wonder if that was on purpose.

    Because I think more men are comfortable being single than women are…as evidence to them making their pets into their children.

  114. honeycomb says:

    @ Earl ..
    I didn’t notice a man-woman split when it came to a happy single life. I wonder if that was on purpose.

    That’s exactly my thought .. were’s the split (re: male & female #’s).

    Because .. we know the results .. and .. they (re: woman author) need to continue to provide cover for “th wimminz” ™.

  115. Pingback: Gotta ask the boss, Christian edition. | Dalrock

  116. truth teller says:

    “Yeah they also know how to use a man and get them to do whatever they want too. At least with a chaste one you got a shot of them seeing you as a human instead of an ATM machine or an emotional punching bag.”

    Yeah but how long does that last? The “chaste” ones pick up the human ATM/emotional manipulator thing too.

  117. earlthomas786 says:

    Yeah but how long does that last? The “chaste” ones pick up the human ATM/emotional manipulator thing too.

    As with all things…it’s not foolproof. There’s plenty of immoral women out there corrupting the good ones. It’s up to the good ones to see through the nonsense.

  118. Pingback: Gotta ask the boss, Christian edition. - Top

  119. Son of Liberty says:

    justdoit says:
    October 10, 2017 at 7:43 pm
    Jason, Rollo and others:

    >>In California depending on your health plan or HMO…..married men have to get their wife’s “permission” to get one, or she has to be made aware of “his” choice. Yet that man’s teenage daughter can have an abortion without him ever knowing about it.

    Yet another example of “his body, her choice”. Well know about “my body, my choice” and how that applies only to women. There is also “a woman’s right to privacy” with respect to ehast she and her doctor decide to do about, well, just about anything. The husband has no such right, not even when it is solely about his own body.

    How about this…

    “I want to have sex with her without her consent (rape?), she will refuse and resist unlike an indefensible child in the womb, but at least I am not going to harm her painfully… hey, at least I am not going to kill her like an unborn child, IT IS MY BODY AND MY RIGHT TO DISCHARGE MY SEXUAL THIRST ON HER!!

    Think about it, no pain, no harm, no murder like abortion.

Please see the comment policy linked from the top menu.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s