At least they haven’t turned the ships pink yet.

Yesterday the US Navy announced what it is calling a “large cultural change”, with the elimination of 91 enlisted ratings titles.  Navy Times explains in Navy scuttles sailors’ enlisted rating titles in huge career shake-up

Sailors will no longer be identified by their job title, say, Fire Controlman 1st Class Joe Sailor, effective immediately. Instead, that would be Petty Officer 1st Class Joe Sailor.

Sailors past and present have longstanding and deep love of the titles that have defined their Navy lives. All of these now belong to the history books.

Two thirds of the way into the article the Navy Times finally explains that this is all about making the Navy more gender neutral:

It began by a directive from Mabus to find gender-neutral rating titles that stripped them of the word “man,” in an effort to be more inclusive to women sailors who make up an increasing size of the force.

Secretary Mabus, you may recall, tried to have male Marines wear female caps three years ago.

All of this is entirely to be expected, and this is only the beginning.  Women pushing to enter male spaces fall into two categories.  A small number of women sincerely want to experience manly pride, and these women are very protective of the masculine nature of the institutions they enter.  A much larger number recognizes that they can’t experience manly pride, and therefore sets out to ensure that men can’t either.

The second group is the one that inevitably takes control, and will forever agitate to mark the space as feminine.  The best way to conceptualize this compulsion is an overwhelming desire to put a pink bow on everything associated with the space (men, machines, uniforms, etc).  We can see this symbolically with the elimination of masculine job titles used for hundreds of years, and we can see it more literally in the placement of a giant pink bow on the flight deck of the amphibious assault ship USS Bonhomme Richard:

pink_bow_on_ship

Information on pink ribon image here and here.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Envy, Feminist Territory Marking, Military, Social Justice Warriors, Ugly Feminists. Bookmark the permalink.

124 Responses to At least they haven’t turned the ships pink yet.

  1. Pingback: At least they haven’t turned the ships pink yet. | Aus-Alt-Right

  2. Anon says:

    If you want to quantify the costs of all this, my comment yesterday deserves a repeat :

    Most people, even some who are on to how much of a fraud the FI is, don’t realize how hard the pump is working…

    US Taxes are already too high. Yet…..

    The National Debt has grown by $10T in just the last decade. From $9T to $19T, in the last 10 years alone.

    That means Federal spending in excess of taxes collected was $10T from 2006-present. Again, taxes are already too high, yet this is spending in excess of taxes.

    Since most government spending is for women at the expense of men, and this represents only the most excessive froth of spending (again, merely what is in excess of already high taxes), this shows you how hard the pump is working.

    For the next fiscal year (10/1/16 to 9/30/17), taxes collected will be $3.6T, and spending will be $4.2T. So $600B of spending in excess of taxes.

    Without female suffrage, it is conceivable that taxes and spending are just $2T each (putting aside the fact that GDP itself would be larger under such lower taxation).

    Instead, the next 12 months will take in $3.6T of Federal Taxes and see $4.2T of spending. The amount spent on each woman’s FI fantasy is so much higher than what they themselves could produce in the free market (i.e. no make-work jobs for women), that future historians will see this as insane.

  3. The Jack Russell Terrorist says:

    Nations that would normally be cautious dealing with the US Military will now be confronting them, just to see what they can pull off. Obama had the biggest purge of Generals since Stalin, appointing a feminist as head of the US Navy, even though she probably never rowed a boat before. Why would men enlist and give their lives for a govt. who despises them.

  4. feeriker says:

    How do I put this politely … ? Oh, hell, I can’t, so I won’t.

    I’m sofa king glad I walked away from the Navy nearly two decades ago, three years shy of being able to retire with a full pension, absolutely amazed that any self-respecting human being with a moral compass would stick around to endure the destructive lunacy. I cannot even imagine what things must be like now. The one silver lning to the current decay is that the Navy has been rendered effectively useless as a combat force. May the same happen to the other three branches of service so as to ensure that the inevitable order from Caesar to impose martial law results in self-destructive farce.

  5. Anon says:

    What you say can’t be true Anon because they aren’t acting like there’s a crisis. So obviously it stands to reason there is no fiscal crisis.

  6. Cane Caldo says:

    Envy the dead who sleep through these days.

  7. feeriker says:

    Incidentally, in the photo Dalrock has embedded above, the number “6” painted on the hull is not just the ship’s identification number. It’s also represents:

    – the collective IQ of the crew
    – the number of REAL men stationed on board (although that’s probably a generous estimate,
    and they’ve no doubt taken their sexuality underground)
    – the maximum number of minutes the ship will survive any encounter with an enemy force under
    actual battle conditions
    – the maximum number of seconds its female/transgender crew will last when ordered to perform a
    physically or psychologically demanding task in the heat of combat
    – the percentage of its female crew who WON’T “suddenly and mysteriously” get pregnant prior to
    the next six-month cruise
    – the minimum number of sexual encounters PER HOUR between male and female crew members
    – the minimum number of false rape allegations made PER week by female crew members
    – the ratio, to 1, of slackers and malingerers versus those actually performing their assigned
    duties
    – the number of COs the ship will go through over the next year due to reliefs for cause due to low
    readiness posture, low morale, and rampant sexual harassment complaints.
    – the ratio, to 1, of women to men who will be promoted and awarded commendations despite
    being not only useless, but detrimental to mission accomplishment

  8. Dave II says:

    America,

    As your enemies grow in numbers and skill you are busy conducting social experiments on your armed forces. You are being disarmed. The gun control debate is an attempt to disarm the common man. The feminisation of the military will significantly weaken the last defence you have left, effectively disarming that too. Meanwhile, Russia, the Middle East and North Korea are watching with incredulity and bated breath, hardly believing their luck, waiting for the moment they’ll know they can strike. This is like the divorce rape of a beta husband, except played out among nations rather than individuals.

  9. A.B. Prosper says:

    Dave, No.

    Americans at leas the ones that count are better armed than ever. Estimates suggest 2 million AR15 type rifles of all brands are sold per year along with 18 million other type weapons.

    We sold in one year more AR15 rifles than the entire size of the US military. In one one year.

    Ammo is being bought in massive amounts as well. People are training and everything.

    The US civilian population has never been better armed, ever

    Also the Russian are not a threat to the US. The Cold War is long over and they do not have the manpower . The Norks have a limited ballistic missile threat but are not a danger otherwise. The Middle East is only a problem because our idiots allow them to migrate here.

    The only threats we face are our main trading partner China, maybe, and if Germany goes Muslim (its 40% under 5 Non German now) and we care otherwise all threats we face are internal and domestic

    What ails the US is an inability to decide what kind of state it should be , an unwillingness to allow the union to separate and no faction yet willing to force its own way. Its enervation and lack of will not lack of capability.

  10. Lost Patrol says:

    Next step – we will let military personnel choose their own titles. In case you missed it, University of Michigan professors have been told to honor the titles people choose for themselves. One good lad already tested the system.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/09/30/michigan-student-successfully-changes-preferred-pronoun-to-his-majesty-on-class-roster.html

  11. greyghost says:

    This is all good news to me. This is the military that is going to be the enforcers of martial law.

  12. Lost Patrol says:

    @feeriker: “the number “6” painted on the hull”

    You sir, are an artist. Only a guy once drawing career sea pay could draft a list like that.

  13. Anon says:

    Meanwhile, Russia, the Middle East and North Korea are watching with incredulity and bated breath, hardly believing their luck, waiting for the moment they’ll know they can strike.

    None of those societies subsidize single motherhood, and almost all children there grow up with both biological parents.

    They have many other flaws (especially the Muslims), but all things considered, it is not obvious that we should be anything other than neutral, and let the chips fall where they may (i.e. let the twats and manginas reap what they have sown).

  14. feeriker says:

    This is all good news to me. This is the military that is going to be the enforcers of martial law.

    EXACTLY.

  15. Micha Elyi says:

    @feeriker: “the number “6” painted on the hull”

    You left out “the number of females sent to shore duty this month after getting themselves pregnant”.

  16. feeriker says:

    @feeriker: “the number “6” painted on the hull”

    You sir, are an artist. Only a guy once drawing career sea pay could draft a list like that.

    Vaguely curious about the origin of the photo, I followed Dalrock’s first link and discovered that the ship aboard which this travesty took place was the USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD-6, not to be confused with the late USS Bonhomme Richard, CVA-31 an Essex-class attack aircraft carrier built during World War II and active throuugh the Vietnam War, the days when America still had a REAL navy). The current “Bonny Dick,” a Landing Helicopter Dock, is an amphib assault ship, meaning that it deploys with a battalion of Marines.

    I doubt any of those Marines were on deck wearing pink in that photo. While I could never have imagined myself saying this all those decades ago when I was on active duty, given the nasty “sibling service” rivalry btwn the Navy and the Marine Corps, I have to commend the Marines for being the most resistant of the services so far to the systematic “faggotization” process that has been slowly destroying the services for the last 20-plus years. Indeed, I’m sure that the faggotizing of the Navy today it is now a source of tasty humor among grunts everywhere.

    I now officially have ZE-RO sympathy or respect for any self-respecting heterosexual male who remains in the Navy.

  17. feeriker says:

    @feeriker: “the number “6” painted on the hull”

    You left out “the number of females sent to shore duty this month after getting themselves pregnant”.

    Good catch.

    I’ll also add “the number of body fat percentage points above the maximum allowed for male sailors that pregnant females are allowed, as well as the minimum number of months after giving birth that they are allowed to keep the extra body fat without being administratively separated from the Navy for failure to meet physical fitness standards (no such slack afforded to male sailors – ever).

  18. Pingback: At least they haven’t turned the ships pink yet. | Reaction Times

  19. “And not my gentle son. The mere sight of him would only encourage the enemy to take over the whole country.”

    The truth is, whenever warriors within armies spend inordinate amounts of time on titles, chevrons and uniform colors, they cease to be an army and will be destroyed.

    Remember the scene from the film Braveheart when the weak, effeminate Prince Edward, son of King Edward “Longshanks”, is preoccupied with his own fashion, which cuffs or weapons are to be set to his left or to his right.

    Later, after throwing Prince Edward’s gay lover out of a window, King Longshanks has a grave decision to make regarding his enemy, William Wallace:

    Longshanks: I shall offer a truce and pie him off. But who will go to him? Not I, huh, if I fell under the sword of that murderer that might be my head in a basket. And not my gentle son. The mere sight of him would only encourage the enemy to take over the whole country. So who do I send? Whom do I send?

  20. greyghost says:

    ………minimum number of months after giving birth that they are allowed to keep the extra body fat without being administratively separated from the Navy for failure to meet physical fitness standards (no such slack afforded to male sailors – ever).

    What they do is just get pregnant again if the command bothers to enforce weight standards. Two pregnancies plus a and b school will kill an enlistment and she becomes a veteran with benefits.

  21. Oleaginous Outrager says:

    The Village People are disappointed that this is no longer the Navy of which they joyfully sang.

  22. rocko says:

    Mind you, as a non Sailor, having to address Sailors by their job titles rather than by their actual rank threw me off always. Yet, it is sad that traditions like this go away for the sake of “diversity.”

  23. Remove the Man
    https://therationalmale.com/2013/05/06/remove-the-man/

    Volumes have been written in the manopshere about how feminine-primary government assumes the masculine providership role in modern relationships, thus freeing an already unhindered hypergamy even more so, but the effort to remove the Man goes far beyond this obvious institution. The fundamental restructuring of gender reference in our very language – as illustrated by the Washington state legislature – attempts to, literally, remove the Man from the equation.

    […]the same social tool has been used by the Feminine Imperative for the past 60 years; inspire self-doubt in male-specific masculinity. By making compliance with the Feminine Imperative a qualification of masculinity, men assign the power to define masculinity to the Feminine Imperative.

    […]For the Feminine Imperative to sustain itself men can never be trusted with masculinity, solution: remove men from being the definers of masculinity and apportion them only enough authority of it that would benefit the Feminine Imperative as necessary.

    Control the language and you control the concept. Control the concept, and what is acceptable and what is not about it, and you control the thought before it forms. As I’ve argued in the past, the end state of the Feminine Imperative’s consolidation of social control isn’t the complete elimination of masculinity, but rather that it conveniently conforms to the needs of the imperative as best suits it.

    ‘Masculinity’ when shame for a lack of performance in desired acts, protection and provisioning are necessary, ‘Misogyny’ when the threat of feminine-primary control is implied in men’s self-esteem, affirmation or reward are attributed to maleness.

    “But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.” – George Orwell, 1984

  24. Lost Patrol says:

    @feeriker: “I have to commend the Marines for being the most resistant of the services so far to the systematic “faggotization” process that has been slowly destroying the services for the last 20-plus years.”

    As much as I would like to be able to defend my old gang on this, the fact is that the Marines have also been sucked into the void, and it’s all downhill from here. The whole trip has been farcical, and there is more to come. This nomenclature drill follows the latest fad, which is of course women (& whatever else you’ve got) into every last man-only enclave; up to and including SpecFor. As usual, all the services have presented a completely dis-united front on this; alternately resisting and then trying to outdo one another on showing enthusiastic compliance.

    The combat arms and special forces are not easy entry points, so they are last to the party. But one day soon it will be noted that the lifting of restrictions has not produced the desired numbers of women in all fields. Adjustments will be made. As we all know, and have already aired out on Dalrock’s blog.

  25. @Anon:

    Once the Fiat Money system was fully in place by the early 70s (really, it was actually just Nixon finally acknowledging what happened 40 years prior), government Debt was wholly disconnected from taxation. Though it would take a long time for everyone involved to actually realize it. It was actually Dick Cheney that first admitted it, though by accident, publicly by a major official.

    It’s a back-side Debt Monetization setup, but the cost shows up in the areas that are generally slow & subtle. This is the cause of most of the actual inflation that doesn’t “show up” in the official Inflation numbers. (I generally don’t think most Economists are quite as stupid as they come off, but to admit any of these points is to never sniff tenure. Let alone be invited to the NY-DC dinner parties.) As the Fed actually isn’t in much control of the Money Supply, as the Fractional Lending by the Banks drives that aspect. (Recently admitted by a Bank of England paper, so it’s not exactly a fringe topic at this point.)

    The issue is that it’s all become a confidence game, but as the US Military still controls the Blue Water and we produce enough food to feed ourselves the game can keep going for a long while. The “problem” is that ultra-low Interest Rates wreck the real economy. Businesses make a lot of short-sighted decisions, as holding onto cash is really bad. People with money will hunt everywhere for any type of return, especially as the large increase in money supply means that all “quality” investments get eaten up in a hurry. Further, near 0% interest rates allows the biggest companies to buy up their competitors that would never make any sense otherwise. Which forces everyone else to push their rates lower, as capital can simply move too easily between countries now. Anywhere that you can get 5% right now, stably, would be so terribly flooded with money it isn’t funny.

    The problem a lot of people get stuck in is thinking the process will look like the previous ones from the early 1900s. Those disasters were the result of the economic approaches of the time. The next disasters will look different because of the economic approaches now. Not to say “better”, just different. Hyper Inflation isn’t on the table, as that’s wholly a political decision. (And given how badly it ended for the politicians that previously chose that route, no one important will choose it again.)

    As with most things, the approach the normal person should taken is always pretty straight forward: get rid of all Debt; hedge in combination of Cash, Hard Currency and Land; be able to defend those possessions. Beyond that, they can drag this out for decades.

  26. anon says:

    “As with most things, the approach the normal person should taken is always pretty straight forward: get rid of all Debt; hedge in combination of Cash, Hard Currency and Land; be able to defend those possessions. Beyond that, they can drag this out for decades.”

    You can also buy stock in some firearms companies (it’s easier than stocking an entire bunker and bartering ammo…but probably not as much of a sure thing if crap hits the fan).

    But again, they aren’t acting like there is a crisis. I’ll only believe this economic “thing” is a problem when they start acting like it’s a crisis! [/sarc]

    More seriously, just about every “survivalist” I know is either current military, or a veteran (or a law enforcement veteran). They aren’t stocking guns and ammo so they can control the population when crap hits the fan, they’re stocking it so they can fight back too.

  27. anon says:

    They are starting to allow service members to carry on some of the bases also.

  28. Oscar says:

    Gents,

    You’ll have a field day with this one.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/09/30/inclusive-canadian-church-debates-suitability-atheist-pastor/

    “Ordained in the Canadian United Church in 1993, the Rev. Gretta Vosper slowly began doubting the truths of Christianity until she found herself an avowed atheist, denying not only the divinity of Jesus Christ but even the notion of God altogether. All this time, however, she continued to lead her church, deemphasizing questions of the supernatural while stressing community based on secular values of inclusiveness and compassion.”

  29. Avraham rosenblum says:

    The navy has been kind of hostile towards Jews for a while and now it is likely that not just Jews but many other young men will simply not choose the Navy as a career. If they are young enough they will go into other branches or just forget enlisting period.In any case the USA has been on a trajectory to discourage any kind of true patriotism. Over the board the government has been so abuse of the common people that few people if any experience any feelings of loyalty any more.

  30. Joe says:

    I bet foreign navies are now terrified of the Yanks!

  31. Anonymous Reader says:

    Rollo, you could post that exact comment in the current thread over at Rational Male with no editing.

  32. @anon:

    People forget the Dot Com Bubble only was the NASDAQ imploding. The other major indices had a fairly steady Down-trend for a couple of years, but they didn’t fall off a cliff. Expect the same event this time, especially as it looks like the EU region that’s going to finally start having to pay the piper.

    But they don’t think it’s a crisis because a few key-clicks from the Fed and all of their liquidity issues are solved. We still don’t know the extent to which the Fed “injected liquidity” in 2008, but it’s somewhere on the tune of 12-15 Trillion USD. There’s no constraints on their Market operations, so why would the Insiders be worried? Those who will pay for it aren’t in the Insiders.

  33. Boxer says:

    Semi-on-topic: Pope Francis channels the Frankfurt School (ping GBFM and Rob Fedders)and specifically Jürgen Habermas, to fight back against feminism. Habermas is a personal friend of (former) Pope Benedict, so I wonder if the two popes aren’t comparing notes with the philosopher now.

    In any event, this is particularly effective. I’ve been critical of Pope Francis in the past, but I think he’s on the right track with this.

    “Today, there is a global war trying to destroy marriage… they don’t destroy it with weapons, but with ideas. It’s certain ideological ways of thinking that are destroying it…we have to defend ourselves from ideological colonization,” he said.

    Gender theory and lifeworld colonization is making inroads into the military, but it’s first target has always been the family.

    Much more at:
    https://cruxnow.com/global-church/2016/10/01/pope-calls-gender-theory-global-war-family/

    Boxer

  34. Tarl says:

    This is all good news to me. This is the military that is going to be the enforcers of martial law.

    The bad news is the military doesn’t have to be especially competent in order to terrorize the population.

  35. Pingback: The marks of convergence | Dark Brightness

  36. Red Pill Latecomer says:

    constrainedlocus: whenever warriors within armies spend inordinate amounts of time on titles, chevrons and uniform colors, they cease to be an army and will be destroyed.

    Just yesterday I was watching an old British TV series, Solider, Soldier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soldier_Soldier

    In the episode I saw, the British Army is consolidating two regiments. The Colonel of one of the regiments says his “number one priority” is to save his regiment’s hackle, which is a feather worn on their berets: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackle

    At a meeting in London, the Army brass make it clear that they favor using the other regiment’s thunderbolt patch. But the Colonel does research and discovers that there is precedent for the other regiment using a hackle during the Crimean War, etc.

    In the end the Colonel, who is portrayed as a sympathetic hero on the show, saves his regiment’s hackle, and thus saves the day.

  37. Red Pill Latecomer says:

    Oh, the Colonel also explains the importance of saving the hackle. That the hackle is a part of regimental history, a cause for pride, high morale, bonding among the soldiers, esprit de corps, etc.

  38. Oscar says:

    @ Tarl says:
    October 1, 2016 at 6:55 pm

    “The bad news is the military doesn’t have to be especially competent in order to terrorize the population.”

    An incompetent military is MORE likely to terrorize the citizenry, not less. Look at the Middle East and the third world in general. Their militaries are thoroughly incompetent at fighting other militaries, but they specialize at terrorizing ordinary civilians.

    Look at it this way. A champion wants to prove himself against other champions, not beat up on ordinary chumps. It’s a matter of honor. A bully, on the other hand, is just barely stronger than the chumps he beats up on, and he loves lording it over them, because he has no honor.

  39. Micha Elyi says:

    “…most government spending is for women at the expense of men…”

    Yes, collectively females are net tax eaters and men are net tax producers.
    Any man* whose voting fails to match an agenda of less taxation and smaller government is an enabler of the corrupt system currently oppressing the republic.

    * females should do the right thing when voting too, but for a man’s self interest is aligned with the public interest so he has absolutely no excuse

  40. Spike says:

    In the 1950s and 1960s it was a joke. Witness “Operation Petticoat” starring Cary Grant and Tony Curtis, about a group of women on a submarine

    http://int.search.myway.com/search/AJimage.jhtml?&n=782b1f06&p2=%5EBA5%5Exdm148%5ETTAB02%5Eau&pg=AJimage&pn=1&ptb=AFFA591A-1655-4009-8BB9-2EBC05D9AFDF&qs=&searchfor=operation+petticoat&si=49588_DM-AU-MACCHROME&ss=sub&st=tab&tpr=sbt&trs=wtt&imgs=1p&filter=on&imgDetail=true

    The sub did get painted pink.

    Somehow, it isn’t funny now.

  41. feeriker says:

    * females should do the right thing when voting too…

    Females “doing the right thing” in this case would be for them to abstain from voting at all, voting being something they should never have been allowed to do in the first place.

  42. technovelist says:

    OT, but here is an astoundingly horrid example of open hypergamy linked from Rollo’s blog, which I think deserves comments here too: http://www.wealthysinglemommy.com/dream-daughter-single-mom/

  43. Boxer says:

    Dear Technovelist:

    Look who’s here! It’s Emma Johnson, the mommyblogger who authored that ridiculous article.

    Feel free to join me and leave a polite, realtalk comment for her on twitter (where she can’t delete it).

    Boxer

  44. anon says:

    “Be part of the Final Solution, and put single moms on the map. Host a #singlemomsforhillary call party Saturday, Oct. 8!”

    FIFH

  45. Anon says:

    Micha Elyi,

    Have you figured out yet that Republicans are no allies of men, and that most are cuckservatives?

  46. Anon says:

    Boxer/Herbie Marcuse is doing God’s work.

  47. Anon says:

    Boxer,

    Where possible, always work in some Muslim angle. Such as :

    “Sorry, but Muslims don’t want concubines that already have bastard spawn and are over 30.”

    Zing!! It will bait them into either a) saying something anti-Islam which could backfire on them, or b) not saying anything at all, encouraging Muslims to get more precise in focusing on such women above others.

  48. anon says:

    I’d post that I “would love to be a part of Hillary’s Final Solution!”
    But that would require signing up for Twitter.

  49. Boxer says:

    Dear Anon:

    Sorry, but Muslims don’t want concubines that already have bastard spawn and are over 30.

    ehehehe. That’s pretty astute trolling. I only wish it were true. Laughably, Muslims seem to have no standards at all, and seem keen on attracting the most useless western sluts.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1724693/police-fear-brit-topless-model-is-planning-to-travel-to-syria-and-become-isis-jihadi-bride/

    It’d be a worthy national project for Brits to encourage all washed up, banged out old hoes to migrate to Islamic State. It’d probably save trillions in welfare payments, and would make much more trouble than bombs for the enemy as well.

    Boxer

  50. Red Pill Latecomer says:

    Red Pill Men can now seek professional help in overcoming their “toxic masculinity”: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/01/us-university-offers-course-for-men-to-deconstruct-toxic-masculi/

    A university in the United States has begun offering classes in “constructive male allyship,” providing a space where male students are able to “question and deconstruct toxic masculinities.”

    Duke University, based in the city of Durham, North Carolina, held its first Learning Community session last week. The women’s centre has organised a nine-week series of seminars, as part of the Duke Men’s Project….

    “We want to deconstruct toxic masculinities to reconstruct healthier, more inclusive notions of masculinity.”

    The nine-week course aims to promote “unlearning violence.”

    The organisers say: “We want to explore, dissect, and construct an intersectional understanding of masculinity and maleness, as well as to create destabilized spaces for those with privilege.”

  51. Tam the Bam says:

    “.. would make much more trouble than bombs for the enemy as well.”
    uh oh chongo .. first sign of “attitude”, and I fear our game old slappers really would end up ‘topless’.
    They’re not like us, you know, Over There.

  52. Tam the Bam says:

    I appreciated this sentiment in Michelle’s comment to the soul-shrivelling guff La Johnson wrote (5th one in).
    “The child also learns the varied styles and personalities of the klan, which is better for them.”

  53. Boxer says:

    Damned good to see you again Tam!

    They’re not like us, you know, Over There.

    If there’s one thing I have faith in, it’s the troublemaking skills of a North American slut. I’d bet those Daesh goons would never know what hit them.

    Boxer

  54. Gunner Q says:

    So, China missile-pops a couple carriers but doesn’t bother to follow up with an invasion. Washington activates the draft but young American men refuse to show. That’s the political Worst Case Scenario: the Elites declare a war and nobody shows up.

    God, this farce is boring. If reality was a book, I’d be skipping to the climax right now in the desperate hope of getting some entertainment for my money. Decent people are left powerless through impossibly unlikely coincidences while clowns cavort in the streets? The least God could do is throw in some awesome fight scenes like He used to… giving us some heroes to admire while the screws keep turning.

    greyghost @ September 30, 2016 at 4:53 pm:
    “This is all good news to me. This is the military that is going to be the enforcers of martial law.”

    I wish. The one Federal enforcement agency I don’t see getting jacked up pink is Homeland Security. It would be a relief if I could see them doing some virtue-signaling at the costs of readiness and proficiency.

  55. Anon says:

    Boxer,

    Laughably, Muslims seem to have no standards at all, and seem keen on attracting the most useless western sluts.

    They accept those uggos in low-status positions, but Muslims too know what the objective hierarchy of looks is, and behave accordingly. Even that model in your link, while a stupid slut who is clearly well past her prime, is not ugly in pure looks (being slutty is different than being ugly).

    My point is, our Tweets can include the Muslim angle, as the ‘feminists’ will either steer clear of any shaming language OR say anti-Islam things. Either way, they lose, we win.

  56. Lost Patrol says:

    @RPL

    I thought the key declaration was this one – “Duke is an environment where some are rarely made uncomfortable while others are made to bear the weight of their identities on a daily basis – we aim to flip that paradigm,” the organisers say.

    Who are these organisers, and how do we ascertain the rarely uncomfortable from those bearing the daily weight of their identities? You know, the paradigm to be flipped?

    Oh I see, Duke’s Women Centre. Got all my questions answered.

  57. Fred Flange, der kommissar says:

    @redpilllatecomer

    Looked at the google doc referenced in the Duke Men’s Center story in the Guardian, and their website. Looks like a nothingburger to me, and I keep an eye on these things. Maybe five neck beards will sign up to make passes at girls who wear glasses, of whom the number will approach 0.

    It’s like that Emma Watson thing, he for she or whatevs. Toy Soldier reports the number of emails and tweets they issued over two full years is (get ready) 3. Not exactly a mass movement, a movement of sorts I suppose.

  58. Boxer says:

    My point is, our Tweets can include the Muslim angle, as the ‘feminists’ will either steer clear of any shaming language OR say anti-Islam things. Either way, they lose, we win.

    At some point, I’m gonna start a sock named something like Ahmed Al-Vaginalshitani and go to town.

  59. Dave II says:

    On technovelist’s link to the blog of that single mom who dreams for her daughter to also become a single mom there’s a link to another article called “A letter to my beautiful, beautiful, beautiful daughter” – that’s “beautiful”, 3 times. Hmm. Why does that sound familiar?

  60. Boxer says:

    Dave II:

    On technovelist’s link to the blog of that single mom who dreams for her daughter to also become a single mom there’s a link to another article called “A letter to my beautiful, beautiful, beautiful daughter” – that’s “beautiful”, 3 times. Hmm. Why does that sound familiar?

    Please feel free to talk back to the idiot who wrote the article. Twitter is free and anonymous.

  61. Jim says:

    The male military personnel may as well just castrate themselves. They’ve already done in every other way.

  62. feeriker says:

    The one Federal enforcement agency I don’t see getting jacked up pink is Homeland Security.

    The Heimatsicherheitsdienst relies upon the active and reserve military for supplemental manpower as well as firepower. USNORCOM (United States Northern Command, a joint services command based out of Norfolk, Virginia) is essentially the Heimatsicherheitsdienst‘s military arm.

  63. Anon says:

    A letter to my beautiful, beautiful, beautiful daughter” – that’s “beautiful”, 3 times. Hmm. Why does that sound familiar?

    Because that is what a lot of pastorbators do to grovel to the fat chicks in their congregation and to assert their manginatude.

    Note how the speech patterns of hardcore ‘feminists’ and pastorbators have seamlessly become identical.

  64. Anon says:

    Holy crap! The blog post that technovelist linked to deserves to be called out more :

    My dream for my daughter is to become a single mom”

    That is her actual *aspiration* for her daughter. Note that her blog URL is ‘wealthy’ single mommy. No doubt that her wealth is merely what the state seized from a man under imputation and threat of imprisonment.

    This might be worthy of a few ‘sphere articles.

  65. Anon says:

    “My dream for my daughter is to become a single mom.”

    I see she also has a son. Is her dream for her son to be under an 80% income tax with income imputed (i.e. modern slavery), given that is the other side of the coin with subsidized single moms? Or is that too many steps ahead for her non-brain to think? Or is she completely indifferent to her son (most likely)?

    Anyway, her son will see her blog someday when he is older. He will grow up to either be an extreme mangina, or a hardcore MRA. These are the only two extremes possible.

  66. Anon says:

    Even more :

    11 celebrity women who look ‘great’ with a buzz cut.

    If anything, this slideshow will make you even more against short hair than you were before, because quite a few formerly very attractive women look completely androgynous on account of having a crew-cut.

    Another ‘truth by assertion’ ram-through operation. I feel bad for the countless young women who will take this horrible advice and lower their looks by 2 full points as a result.

  67. The Question says:

    @ Rollo Tomassi

    “Control the language and you control the concept. Control the concept, and what is acceptable and what is not about it, and you control the thought before it forms. As I’ve argued in the past, the end state of the Feminine Imperative’s consolidation of social control isn’t the complete elimination of masculinity, but rather that it conveniently conforms to the needs of the imperative as best suits it.”

    It’s feminism once more attempting to play God via the state by confusing the language.

    https://anarchistnotebook.com/2016/09/16/the-states-tower-of-babble/

    When feminists speak of “consent” as though it meant the same thing as “desire,” they aren’t ignorant about what they’re doing. It is purposefully done.

    A confused people are a divided people, and a divided people are easily distracted by petty, unnecessary divisions caused by confusion over the meaning of words. For feminists, it enables them to turn women against their men as evidenced by the rape culture myth. For the state, such people make more easily governable subjects.

    Feminists use the shroud of mysticism over the meaning of words to hide their true intent.

    The best defense against such behavior is the question, “What do you mean by that?” It places a burden on the person to explain or define the words they use. They cannot hide behind presumptions that you both have the same meaning in mind.

    A free and healthy society is based on a strong, cohesion language. A dying culture is filled people struggling to comprehend themselves and one another.

    It is clear which category the West falls into. The question that remains is how long this can go on before the natural order of things dictate that people separate themselves politically according to their respective languages and whether this will be carried out peacefully or not.

    I doubt its the latter.

  68. Dale says:

    @anon
    “lower their looks by 7 full points as a result.”

    FIFY. A woman with no hair is ugly to me. Few women with short hair can even manage “attractive”.

    Feminists try to destroy other women by encouraging them to make themselves ugly. Even knowing that women tend not to think much about the consequences of their actions, I still find it strange that women believe following feminist advice is in their own best interest.

  69. Anon says:

    FIFY. A woman with no hair is ugly to me. Few women with short hair can even manage “attractive”.

    It is noteworthy that while the body and face are the same, the removal of a good head of long hair really does demolish the woman’s looks. It matters a lot more than people realize.

  70. Red Pill Latecomer says:

    Dale: Feminists try to destroy other women by encouraging them to make themselves ugly.

    Just like Aesops’s fable of The Fox Without a Tail: http://www.bartleby.com/17/1/65.html

    Human psychology hasn’t changed in thousands of years.

  71. Jim Christian says:

    I worked in an A-6E Squadron. I was also loaned out the the Air Wing and the F-14 Squadrons aboard USS Nimitz 1976-1982. And so, on certain cruises, my duties were liquid oxygen, ejection seats and aircraft air conditioning with some collateral duties dealing with some types of weapons and flight deck troubleshooting of problems with planes about to launch. Did my share of fire fighting on a couple of ugly occasions, too. My rating was known as AME2, Aviation Structural Mechanic E. At the end I was a Second Class Petty Officer.

    What the Hell is gender specific about that title, AME2? I mean, aside from the fact that no woman actually ever fulfilled that level of responsibility that was routine for myself and my male counterparts. My ilk, if you will? I don’t care really, carrier aviation is next to dead, carriers don’t go to sea anymore (too many women with children that they have no idea what to do about if they were to deploy). And so, why all this? Seaman, Airman? Ok, Seawoman, Airwoman.

    They’re insane.

  72. feeriker says:

    Jim Christian says:
    October 3, 2016 at 5:26 am

    I spent a lot of time on carriers too over the course of seven years as a Naval Aircrewman (a Cryptologic Technicians “spook” in EA-3Bs [THAT really shows my age!] and later ES-3A Vikings, with VQ-1 and VQ-2 and later VQ-6). Coordinating the operations of an aircraft carrier is difficult enough under the best of conditions at sea, with an all male crew in a 98 percent readiness state. I cannot imagine how it is even possible to get a carrier underway today, let alone sustain flight operations under combat conditions, with a 50 percent female crew, half or more of which isn’t even deployable at all.

    You’re right, carrier aviation is dead. Current drone technology enables the kind of warfare that carriers once conducted, and at a fraction of the cost and hassle, to say nothing of the fact that the kind of wars fought today are of the type that renders 2GW concepts like aircraft carriers obsolete. To continue to deploy carrier battle groups today is an exercise in pointless and expensive theater.

    The U.S. Navy today is a sick joke – as is any loser who stays on active duty in it.

  73. Red Pill Latecomer says:

    As someone who’s never been in the military, I wonder if male U.S. military officers operate with an Orwellian doublethink mentality. On one level, they do and say what’s politically required, praising the excellence of female and tranny soldiers and sailors.

    But on another level, they secretly know that women and trannies are a burden, and so in their mental war game scenarios, they rely only on the male soldiers.

    They study their assets (trained men) and liabilities (women and trannies), and plan accordingly, though they pretend otherwise.

    I wonder how many feminists and cucks know this, and assume that in a real war the military’s men will obligingly save the day, even as they pretend afterwards that the woman and trannies were the real heroes.

  74. feeriker says:

    I wonder if male U.S. military officers operate with an Orwellian doublethink mentality. On one level, they do and say what’s politically required, praising the excellence of female and tranny soldiers and sailors.

    It really depends on whether a moral compass, common sense, and human decency have been laundered out of them during their military training. Some never had any of these to begin with. These are the ones who eventually reach flag rank (Generals and Admirals), the “political cadre” that ensures that the latest PC orthodoxy dictated by the nation’s civilian leadership becomes part and parcel of the armed forces’ operating doctrine, no matter how deleterious to morale and welfare or, more importantly, destructive to operational readiness it is. Others manage to retain their moral compass, common sense, and human decency and leave the service after a few years, realizing just how badly deceived they were and how thoroughly betrayed were their ideals.

  75. feeriker says:

    They study their assets (trained men) and liabilities (women and trannies), and plan accordingly, though they pretend otherwise.

    Deep down, most of them know full well that the U.S. military is utterly incapable of fighting a serious enemy.

    I wonder how many feminists and cucks know this, and assume that in a real war the military’s men will obligingly save the day, even as they pretend afterwards that the woman and trannies were the real heroes.

    Feminists don’t know enough about the military to have an informed opinion. Cuckservatives, the people who pay lip srrvice to the idea that government is fundamentally evil and incompetent while continuing to fund it at record levels, for some reason believe that the same government that can do nothing else competently is somehow an invincible machine of ruthless and brilliant efficiency when it comes to waging war.

  76. Dalrock says:

    @RPL

    I wonder how many feminists and cucks know this, and assume that in a real war the military’s men will obligingly save the day

    All of them, or nearly all. It is taken as a given in every step of feminism that men will quietly compensate for and bear the full cost of whatever bad decision is being proposed. When this given doesn’t materialize 100% we hear the now familiar shrieking about weak men screwing feminism up.

  77. Lost Patrol says:

    All services are hurrying to get in on the act. Today’s version features USAF, which has to this point refused to stop calling their women “airmen”.

    https://www.airforcetimes.com/articles/air-force-diversity?

    “Operational career fields – such as pilots, air battle managers, combat systems officers, space and missile airmen, cyber airmen and intelligence – are especially lacking in diversity, the Air Force said. The Air Force will require leaders in these fields to come up with plans to address the underlying causes of the lack of diversity, and find ways to improve recruitment and retention of women and minorities.”

    The tactic here is to always label women as, women-and-minorities. You have to say it like one word. This expands the virtue signaling in hopes of allying the various advocates for these groups.

  78. anon says:

    “All services are hurrying to get in on the act. “

    Of course they are.
    Congress holds the purse strings and they cater to their districts and voting bases.

  79. BubbaCluck says:

    Airpeople.

  80. Random Angeleno says:

    I realized back in the 90’s that unmanned aircraft (UAV’s in Pentagon parlance) were eventually going to be a game changer in military aviation as well as commercial. We’ve seen its evolution over the years and that evolution will accelerate as weaponized UAV’s get either smaller or get more range, maybe both if they’re creative enough.

    So yes, carrier-based aviation is essentially dead. If it gets close enough to hostile territory, scores of cheap drones and missiles can be sent at it. All it takes is one or two to get thru to incapacitate the entire platform. Think about a small drone or two released by a nearby small speedboat or divers sneaking into the bridge command center, for instance. Or disable the aircraft elevators. Or take out the communications hardware. Defending a huge carrier against these new threats is going to be dang difficult. Will be interesting to see the next steps in UAV, UAV platform and UAV weapon developments. For sure, this ain’t your granddaddy’s Navy, heck not even your dad’s Navy. Not sure they realize that in the Pentagon.

  81. feeriker says:

    For sure, this ain’t your granddaddy’s Navy, heck not even your dad’s Navy. Not sure they realize that in the Pentagon.

    They do, but they can’t afford to admit it. To do so would put most of them out of a job. NEVER forget that the purpose of the armed services is porkbarrel spending, NOT national defense.

  82. Boxer says:

    Notice which gender the pastor is.

    She’s on twitter also.

    I just invited members of this congregation and the pastor here. Hopefully the bull dyke will have more guts than male feminist Sam Powell who didn’t dare explain himself here.

  83. Anon says:

    Hopefully the bull dyke will have more guts than male feminist Sam Powell who didn’t dare explain himself here.

    Jesse Powell is also an uber-mangina. Someone who thinks that FRAs are ok due to ‘past injustices’ by different men towards women (by taking such a position, he admits that he is an incel that has so little romantic contact with women that he has no personal risk).

    Surnames like Powell and Walsh seem to be more common among the vocal mangina roster. Perhaps there is something to that….

  84. Gunner Q says:

    @The Question,
    That was the second question. The first question was, can a woman lead a church? When the first was answered ‘yes’ there was no reason for the second to be ‘no’.

    It’s a positive trend. I hope all atheist pastors publicly announce their atheism. Honesty is always a good start.

    “I wonder how many feminists and cucks know this, and assume that in a real war the military’s men will obligingly save the day”

    The feminist is a blank slatist. They really do believe the only difference between male and female soldiers is training and indoctrination. Evidence to the contrary is therefore a paranoid conspiracy.

    The amazing bit is that feminists believe this in fanatical defiance of irrefutable facts like testosterone and bone structure. Even if human nature could be reshaped arbitrarily, why MUST MUST MUST male and female sexuality be inverted at all costs? Why not just vive la difference? Why do cucks keep doing the will of rebellious women? The only explanation is Original Sin.

    Therefore, the war they’re trying to win is against God, not other nations. Many would probably view America’s destruction as a bonus because we’re the most successful Christian nation in history. They certainly aren’t acting loyal.

  85. feeriker says:

    It’s a positive trend. I hope all atheist pastors publicly announce their atheism. Honesty is always a good start.

    I’m waiting for this butch to become more renowned and for other self-righteous pastors to wax indignant over her honesty. My response to them would be something along the lines of “at least she ADMITS to not believing in either the Bible or the One Who Created It and has stopped pretending to do so. You, on the other hand, profess to believe, yet clearly choose to ignore God’s commandments that you dislike, or actively disobey them and encourage others to do the same. Who do you think God finds more abominable?”

  86. feeriker says:

    I just invited members of this congregation and the pastor here. Hopefully the bull dyke will have more guts than male feminist Sam Powell who didn’t dare explain himself here.

    Although unfortunately I doubt she’ll make an appearance here either, it would be refreshing if she were to do so and honestly admit –and explain– her subversion, which is clearly what she is doing. In fact, I’d probably have more respect for her than I would for a typical churchian CEO who is also clearly subverting the church, but just doesn’t have the gonads or strength of character to admit that he despises much of what Scripture says and is working overtime to lead his congregation astray from it.

  87. Boxer says:

    Dear Fellas:

    It’s a positive trend. I hope all atheist pastors publicly announce their atheism. Honesty is always a good start.

    The atheist Christian priest has made contact, suggesting that she’ll be here when she gets off her long flight and gets settled in.

    I certainly intend to ask her what the heck she’s doing, LARPing as a Christian priest, but I am going to be polite and civil if/when she shows. She’s already proven to have more courage than the average male feminist who pretends to be a Christian leader, just by talking to me. That’s something.

    This blog is pretty compelling. She’s unafraid, and she may give us something to think about, so I’m looking forward to her visit.

    Regards,

    Boxer

  88. Red Pill Latecomer says:

    That atheist pastor sounds like the subject of an Onion article.

  89. Scott says:

    Another detour for the interested.

    https://americandadweb.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/peak-subjectivity/

    Good evening, gentlemen.

  90. @Marcus:

    Credit for the reference to the P.T. in the video. Nice inside gamer jokes. 🙂

  91. Boxer says:

    Dear Kooky Linx:

    No doubt the next conspiracy theory you post will claim that Pope Benedict XVI is secretly in league with your Jewish conspiracy, etc.

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B003UNLAZS/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1

    You’re rockin’ the tinfoil hat, bro… Never stop!

    Boxer

  92. anon says:

    From the article
    “Until now, his military health insurance refused to anything to do with her transition from male to female, leaving Jenn very distressed”

    It would sure be a bad thing to distress Jenn and keep heshe as heshe has lived hisher entire life. But being expected to charge up a field under fire…yeah, that’s not comparatively distressing. That’s just the job description.
    What about the needs of Apotemnophiliacs? Aren’t they distressed too? Why is their distress less important than Jenn’s distress and shouldn’t military coverage pay for their amputations?
    (and after that…a lifetime of disability too)

  93. Boxer says:

    I had to look up Apotemnophiliacs – an apt analogy!

  94. The Question says:

    @ Dalrock

    You cannot pass this one up. Men are shamed by playing video games while this goes on.

    http://nypost.com/2014/04/10/more-young-women-choosing-dogs-over-motherhood/

    You’ll even have a photo for the post.

    https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/dogs_over_babies-60.jpg?quality=90&strip=all

  95. feeriker says:

    http://nypost.com/2014/04/10/more-young-women-choosing-dogs-over-motherhood/

    The poor dogs! There HAS to be enough compassion out there to kick off a movement to rescue these poor pooches from these disgusting women. I’d see the poor things euthanized first (the dogs, not the women, although the women are good candidates too).

  96. feeriker says:

    You’ll even have a photo for the post.

    https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/dogs_over_babies-60.jpg?quality=90&strip=all

    Any woman who can’t muster up enough self-discipline to be a decent mother to a human child probably isn’t really much more fit to care for a dog either. I’m willing to wager that any dog that develops physical or behavioral problems, however treatable they are, that becomes too much for one of these women to handle, that begins draining her purse of money, and starts stressing her out will either wind up abused, abandoned, or euthanized (a proxy for the baby she would abort if she ever got knocked up). Indeed, I’d be curious to know how many shelter dogs today were left there by neurotic single women who couldn’t cope with them after they outgrew the puppy stage.

  97. Red Pill Latecomer says:

    I once saw an online article in which a woman introduced her cat by saying, “He is my son. Don’t laugh. Don’t post any objections. If you can’t accept it, just go away. He is my son

  98. feeriker says:

    I once saw an online article in which a woman introduced her cat by saying, “He is my son. Don’t laugh. Don’t post any objections. If you can’t accept it, just go away. He is my son

    If the nutty neocons in D.C. really want to kick off WW III, the Mother of All Wars, the Final Conflict, all they need to do to launch the first offensive salvo is to round up as many of these BSCBs as they can find and airlift them to whatever country has been designated the latest “pivot of the Axis of Evil.”

  99. Red Pill Latecomer says:

    I googled and found this page about women who love their cats, with some extreme comments: http://isitnormal.com/story/i-treat-my-cat-like-my-own-child-53477/

    * I swear to gawd, my cat is like my own spawn. She is a tortoise shell, a total bitch, stuck-up, a loner, mouthy, very faithful to only me, does her own thing. It’s like she is my real child in cat form. I love her that much too.

    * Awww, my cats are like my babies too. They are soooo spoiled!! But so faithful to me 🙂 Best companions ever!

    * I’m a mum of 2 [human children], single so I’m busy all the time. I’ve got 6 cats and I’m the same. I’ll come home at night to sleep with my fur kids instead of staying out at familys etc after late outings. My kids who are 2 & 4 love my cats like siblings and I honesty love my cats same as I adore my kids

    * I love my cat 😀 she’s basically like my child ^_^

    * My cats are like. My babies too

    * I love and care for each Molotov cocktail as if it were my own child.

  100. Anon says:

    I googled and found this page about women who love their cats, with some extreme comments

    I feel bad for the cats. They deserve better.

    Plus, when Manboobz Futrelle croaks, his cats won’t even have an acceptable feast, since his flesh is too toxic and blubbery, and hence unfit for feline consumption.

    They hunted the mammoth? Yeah, Futrelle wishes. ‘They rejected the mammoth’ is more like it.

    Plus, it is fortunate that there are no cat-to-human STDs, or Futrelle’s sordid den of villainy would be ground zero for the pandemic (although it cannot spread to other humans through Futrelle).

  101. @Anon:

    No, just Cat-to-Human brain parasites.

  102. Oscar says:

    Girls are outperforming boys in high school, but the focus is still on girls.

    “It’s what Christina Hoff Sommers wrote about in her book “The War Against Boys” nearly two decades ago. What Perry noted in the chart above isn’t new for this year, it’s been a trend since before Hoff Sommers’ book. Yet the focus is still on girls.”

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/girls-outperforming-boys-in-high-school/article/2603570

  103. Boxer says:

    Plus, when Manboobz Futrelle croaks, his cats won’t even have an acceptable feast, since his flesh is too toxic and blubbery, and hence unfit for feline consumption.

    I think Futrelle may have had a super ugly wife or girlfriend at one point… one of those typical omega-pairings (in heartiste speak) between people so hideous that they achieve a modicum of self-awareness, and realize they truly can’t do any better.

  104. feeriker says:

    I feel bad for the cats. They deserve better.

    * I’m a mum of 2 [human children], single so I’m busy all the time. I’ve got 6 cats and I’m the same. I’ll come home at night to sleep with my fur kids instead of staying out at familys etc after late outings. My kids who are 2 & 4 love my cats like siblings and I honesty love my cats same as I adore my kids “

    I feel sorry for the KIDS in that second paragraph more than the cats (whom I also pity, for sure).

    If this woman’s two kids are girls, both will be knocked up by thugs before they turn 18. If they’re boys, jail cells await them before they hit the same age.

  105. Original Laura says:

    P. D. James wrote a book about this sort of thing ten years ago. The Children of Men. People are suddenly sterile, and there are no more babies, so people begin baptizing kittens and turning the kittens into substitutes for children.

    This sort of thing has always gone on. I knew an Air Force major and his wife who were childless. They had all sorts of pets, including a monkey, and they had very large (up to 18 x 30 inches or thereabouts) professional photographic portraits of some of their pets. In the 1970s, they were real outliers, but no one would think much about it these days.

    People often think that those who are really good with animals are automatically going to be great with children, but the relationship with a pet never really changes. You start off in charge, and remain in charge, while the relationship with a child alters profoundly over the course of a lifetime. Lots of people are great with babies or little children, but stumble badly as the children get older. And there are plenty of people who find it difficult to cope with babies and toddlers who do well with school-aged kids.

    I’m stunned by the woman who put the family’s cats on the same level as her children. I can’t imagine what her children will think when they read her words.

  106. Anon says:

    I think Futrelle may have had a super ugly wife or girlfriend at one point…

    Possible. But why do you think that?

    The full title of the blog should be “They Rejected The Mammoth So Now He is a Butthurt Mangina Blogger”.

  107. Boxer says:

    Possible. But why do you think that?

    He completely panicked when I speculated about it.

    My theory is that his wife/gf works and makes the rent on the double-wide, so that he can sit around all day, LARPing as the one-true-latter-day-prophet of male feminism.

    He’s clearly terrified of anyone getting a photograph of her, or even knowing that she exists, which suggests that she may have no idea as to his online shenanigans. (She probably spends as little time as possible with him on purpose, and let’s face it — who could blame her?)

    Bring it up sometime, if you get a chance. See how he reacts.

  108. grettavosper says:

    So, here I am. Totally and seriously uninterested in a conversation that uses derogatory and dehumanizing language. If you’re willing to set that aside, we can engage. Your call.

  109. Feminist Hater says:

    Can you be a little more specific? Are you the single mother who wants her daughter to be a single mother? Are you a crazy cat lady? Are you in the military and think ships should be painted pink? Are you perhaps Dave Futrelle’s wife/girlfriend?

    Speculation is all terribly interesting but an introduction is really needed.

  110. Anon says:

    Boxer,

    He completely panicked when I speculated about it.

    So you actually comment there?

    Well, there are two people who routinely destroy manboobz, and would love to know some dirt on manboobz. Those are Judgybitch and Matt Forney. If you pass along this info, they may run with it.

  111. feeriker says:

    Feminist Hater says:
    October 5, 2016 at 3:58 pm

    Don’t feed the troll. It’s arrogant, presumptuous introduction of itself automatically renders it unworthy of anyone’s attention here.

  112. Boxer says:

    Dear Anon:

    A long ass time ago he featured my old blog on his manboobz site, inviting me to come over and argue with the sad aggregation of faggots and losers he gathered together there.

    http://www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/2012/05/05/not-all-misogynists-are-like-that/

    Mere speculation about the girth of his sexual option led him to delete my comments and ban me from manboobz.

    It’s really bizarre, but I used to have a photo of him with some slovenly fat chick, and I could swear I thought he was married to the poor woman… but it was a long time ago. In any event, if he ever bugs you, try it out.

    Best,

    Boxer

  113. Boxer says:

    My comments keep disappearing here – lol

  114. Boxer says:

    Hi Greta:

    Thanks for coming. You’ve got far more guts than most of the people featured here.

    I’m curious as to why you would want to be a Christian priest.

    Mind you, I’m an atheist too. I can’t imagine posing as a man of the cloth. It’d be a waste of my time and I’m sure the regular congregants would be angry about me playacting the role.

    Anyway, hope you enjoy New Zealand. I suppose it’s springtime down under.

    Boxer

  115. Lost Patrol says:

    Had to bring back a military thread to get this the attention it deserves.

    https://www.airforcetimes.com/articles/five-breastfeeding-rooms-open-at-malmstrom-air-force-base?

Please see the comment policy linked from the top menu.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s