Doing the job no American man would do.

When it comes to women pushing their way into the US military, Complementarians adopt the same posture the left does with illegal aliens.  Illegal aliens, we are told, aren’t forcing their way into our country and taking American jobs; they are merely undocumented workers forced to cross the border to do the jobs Americans won’t do.  Likewise, Complementarians don’t see women clambering to dress up as men, they see women being forced to do what men are unwilling to do.

No doubt the CBMW will be dismayed to learn that men’s cowardly unwillingness to serve in the military goes all the way to the top.  Last week we learned that President Obama was forced to select a woman to be the top general in defense of our homeland.

General Robinson would lead the United States Northern Command, which is based in Colorado Springs and was created after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to coordinate the military’s response to domestic threats.

The CBMW often compares our current situation to Deborah in Judges 4 being forced to accompany Barak as he lead the troops in battle.  If the CBMW is right about what is going on, none of the men in the US Military were willing to step up, leaving a reluctant General Lori Robinson no choice but to take command of the defense of our homeland.

In other recent news regarding women in the US military:  All Marines Forced To Go Through Training To Erase ‘Unconscious Bias’ As Women Enter Combat Roles  (H/T Instapundit).

The reason for the training is mostly because male Marines have by and large been totally opposed to allowing women into combat roles. A survey conducted in 2012 by the Center for Naval Analyses found two-thirds of males Marines disapproved of integrating women, and a third of female Marines also opposed the idea.

This entry was posted in Complementarian, Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, Cracks in the narrative, Envy, Instapundit, Military, Rebellion, Social Justice Warriors, Turning a blind eye, Ugly Feminists. Bookmark the permalink.

44 Responses to Doing the job no American man would do.

  1. Pingback: Doing the job no American man would do. | Neoreactive

  2. Tarl says:

    1. Good thing the “homeland defense” command doesn’t matter, because it doesn’t do anything.

    2. Marines do not have an “unconscious bias” against women — it is a very conscious one, based on their experience of what Marines have to do and the inability of women to do it.

  3. quigboo says:

    I am about to enter the Royal Canadian Air Force and honestly, it’s embarrasing to be told that the training is really harsh and then take a look at the YouTube videos and see 5 foot tall, pudgy women taking the training. Masculine men seek excellence and these idiots are sapping the prestige and merit out of our most important institutions.

  4. Damn Crackers says:

    My people—infants are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, your guides mislead you and they have swallowed up the course of your paths. – Isaiah 3:12.

    Although, it’s not like one needs Scripture to tell you this promotion is a bad idea.

  5. I’m loving it, give us moar!

  6. feeriker says:

    1. Good thing the “homeland defense” command doesn’t matter, because it doesn’t do anything

    That’s true at the moment. However, once our overlords decide that us shit-eating peasants are getting a bit too uppity and need to be put in our places, NORTHCOM is going to be the command responsible for ensuring that platoons of PTSD-addled veterans of Iraqghanistan with itchy trigger fingers are deployed to your neighborhood to keep you and yours in line.

    How perfectly fitting that imposition of martial law be made the responsibility of a woman.

  7. >Masculine men seek excellence and these idiots are sapping the prestige and merit out of our most important institutions.

    I say it is almost like a coordinated plan or something:

    https://internationalcommunistconspiracy.wordpress.com/

  8. Stryker says:

    Who better to head up command of the domestic defense forces in a time of arrival law or civil unrest? How about someone that is more likely to follow orders and NOT inspire subordinates? A woman is a much safer pick for a president that wants more power.

    Who better for a dictator to have issuing commands and carrying atrocities than a bunch of women? They are more likely to follow orders and less likely to take risks that would jeopardize the leaders plans

  9. Pingback: Doing the job no American man would do. | Reaction Times

  10. l jess says:

    Time for the military to leave the government fold and become mercenaries – then they do not get told how to accept shitty soldieresses.

  11. Anonymous Reader says:

    Good job, Dalrock, but we can’t expect conservative feminists to reason their way out of a position they did not reason themselves into. Instead I expect the CBMW and other conservative feminists to double down on their misandry.

    Maybe via convoluted “women don’t sin but when they do it’s because a man made them” rabbit trails such as we see here:

    http://www.theologyforwomen.org/2016/03/on-nude-selfies.html

    I won’t make the time to wade into comments over there, but I see two things:
    1. Envy of the Kardashian woman not even thinly disguised
    2. Obsession with controlling men in general and male sexuality in particular

    Envy and control of men – very popular feminist topics.

  12. Anon says:

    It is long past time for men to stop joining the military. It is too obvious what their priorities are, and men who continue to serve in this now ignoble institution are obstructing the natural cleansing that will happen.

    Men who continue to serve in this institution as of 2016 are blue-pill, and hence lose status in my eyes and others’..

  13. Anon says:

    feeriker,

    How perfectly fitting that imposition of martial law be made the responsibility of a woman.

    This is no surprise at all. Remember that women crave such a structure, for it makes it easy for women to decide who to get impregnated by (which, after all, is the majority of what female psychology consists of).

    Execution of beta males who invent things to improve human prosperity is high on their list of priorities.

  14. Im 58 years old. I still have yet to meet any woman as strong as I am. The military does not take old men for good reason. I am stronger, faster and meaner than any woman, young or old. But among young men, I’m nothing.

  15. Anonymous Reader says:

    How perfectly fitting that imposition of martial law be made the responsibility of a woman.

    This is no surprise at all. Remember that women crave such a structure, for it makes it easy for women to decide who to get impregnated by (which, after all, is the majority of what female psychology consists of).

    It’s Galadriel from Tolkhein, only with the Ring in her little hot hand.

    Funny how a rather reclusive scholar in the 1930’s understood women better than most educated man nowadays.

  16. PokeSalad says:

    Funny how a rather reclusive scholar in the 1930’s understood women better than most educated man nowadays.

    Perhaps because he had more than a passing acquaintance with the Bible…

  17. PokeSalad says:

    NORTHCOM is going to be the command responsible for ensuring that platoons of PTSD-addled veterans of Iraqghanistan with itchy trigger fingers are deployed to your neighborhood to keep you and yours in line.

    A nontrivial number might be on the other side….

  18. Jack Russell Terrorist says:

    Remember the military purges of Generals under Obama. The largest purges since Stalin. Obama replaced many Generals and Admirals with radical feminists. Micheal Savage said these have no military experience and have probably never even rowed a boat before, yet they hold important positions. I believe he also said some are lesbians.

  19. Spike says:

    Why does Defence Secretary Ashton Carter have to tell everyone that the new female leaders are “exceptionally strong”?
    Strength is a masculine quality that is self-evident. In the case of the military, the soldier who has seen combat, is calm and shows initiative in combat, has proven himself in combat and survived combat is the one promoted. His actions speak for themselves. His comrades respect him. No artificial inflation is necessary.

    Obama had better take note: Russia has a far more efficient military system than his, by miles

    https://www.rt.com/op-edge/334715-nato-russia-operation-syria/

    With 40 planes and about $3 million a day, the Russians were able to deliver about 9000 airstrikes in 6 months. NATO and the US, with 180 planes could not deliver a quarter of that.
    Putting women in charge and putting women on the front lines won’t improve this inefficiency.

  20. Swanny River says:

    If we took the top ten Complementarians and made them grapple with this post over the comforts of a coffee table, what do you think the response be? I bet they’d agree to a point, making nice and all, but if they were pinned to their logic, they’d end up arguing and then dismissing Dalrock.
    After all, Piper has only had to exert authority two times in 40 ,years, so why should he listen to Dalrock?/s
    Cartoonish chivalry was a wonderfully concise phrase.

  21. feeriker says:

    A nontrivial number might be on the other side….

    Dear Lord Jesus, let us hope so …

  22. greyghost says:

    Feeriker
    What would those men be fighting for. To keep in power people that openly hate them? Imagine fighting and killing men that want to be free from liberalism and tyranny. Stars and stripes and any of the “military’ times full of articles bestowing the virtues of homosexuality and transgender with the obligatory triumphs of the female soldiers and airmen. meanwhile white heterosexual males and good old fashion family men are reminded that they are by nature racist, sexist and homophobes that must be taught tolerance. At the same time they are 905 of the killed and maimed killing family men as themselves for the privilege of being reminded of how bad they are.

  23. feeriker says:

    Im 58 years old. I still have yet to meet any woman as strong as I am. The military does not take old men for good reason. I am stronger, faster and meaner than any woman, young or old. But among young men, I’m nothing.

    And yet even at your advanced age you’re more fit for the rigors of combat life than is a trained woman.

    One of the epiphanies that I had after nearly two decades of active duty, something that should have been obvious (or maybe was, but I was just too indoctrinated at the time to realize it) was this: women in the military are a sociopolitical statement, nothing more. No nation that is serious about having a combat-ready fighting force puts women anywhere near anything having to do with actual fighting. Even those such nations that do put women in uniform (e.g., Israel, North Korea, China, and Russia) keep them far, FAR away from any situations (other than rear-echelon medical units) where human lives are at stake. All four have had experience within the last century, usually as a desperate last measure, with putting women in frontline combat. None saw anything good come out of it, even when their national survival was threatened. Of course the United States has never been so externally threatened (and no, World War II was NOT such a war) and probably never will be, so TPTB feel no compunction about letting women play G.I. Jane. So what if it gets a bunch of men killed? They won’t be from among the ruling classes and it’s not like any external enemy is really threatening the power of the One Percent, so who cares?

  24. greyghost says:

    women in the military are a sociopolitical statement, nothing more. No nation that is serious about having a combat-ready fighting force puts women anywhere near anything having to do with actual fighting.

    One of the things I see here in the manosphere give often is the saying that men are expendable and women are more valuable for reproduction. I always felt that was bullshit and never used that comment to explain the draft only for men. The reason for men only is efficiency and effectiveness period.

  25. feeriker says:

    Feeriker
    What would those men be fighting for. To keep in power people that openly hate them? Imagine fighting and killing men that want to be free from liberalism and tyranny. Stars and stripes and any of the “military’ times full of articles bestowing the virtues of homosexuality and transgender with the obligatory triumphs of the female soldiers and airmen. meanwhile white heterosexual males and good old fashion family men are reminded that they are by nature racist, sexist and homophobes that must be taught tolerance. At the same time they are 905 of the killed and maimed killing family men as themselves for the privilege of being reminded of how bad they are.

    I certainly hope you’re right, GG. Logic certainly doesn’t dictate loyalty to the regime on these mens’ part. I do indded hope that the majority of those ordered to fill their fellow citizens full of lead will not only not comply with such an order, but will direct the lead at those who dared issue such a criminal order in the first place. Unfortunately, from what I see there are too many still in uniform who are drunk on the Koolaid, who depend on Uncle Sam’s 30 pieces of monthly silver for their living, who just have no clue about what they’re being conditioned to do, or who have been raised in a society so nihilistic and sociopathic that they have no empathy for other humans (IOW, products of government indoctrinaria who will be fulfiling the very purpose for which they’ve been created).

    Again, I hope I’m wrong, but so far the evidence doesn’t seem to give cause for optimism.

  26. greyghost says:

    freeiker
    You are right because they have no where else to go. Given a real choice some can be peeled off. Spiritual motivation is a huge part of military or any other effectiveness. The ones remaining will not be nearly as effective if their whole heart is in it and also note that the generals are the political loyalist and not the militarily effective types. despite the body armour advanced weapons and such it may not work out for the elites.

  27. Dal- Have you seen this going around:

    Glad the Army decided to admit women to all combat specialties, to include special forces. Brilliant decision.

  28. >>>A nontrivial number might be on the other side….
    >>>Dear Lord Jesus, let us hope so

    So it is Syria? Damascus in New York? I don’t think the troops will fight against the people- assuming there are enough of them. Unfortunately, I don’t think there will be enough of them and the anti-feminists will be rounded up and put in education centers by the nice soldiers. Most of the men will look at their video screens and TV’s with their rotund bellies and they won’t fight. How could they? The wives and girlfriends will not give them permission to fight the feminists. Check mate.

  29. Anonymous Reader says:

    Swanny
    If we took the top ten Complementarians and made them grapple with this post over the comforts of a coffee table, what do you think the response be?

    At best, they’d pick out some tiny thing to disagree over and blow it up like a Macy’s balloon.
    More likely:
    Denial, namecalling, followed by more denial, followed by them flouncing away in a huff.

    I bet they’d agree to a point, making nice and all, but if they were pinned to their logic, they’d end up arguing and then dismissing Dalrock.

    Nope. Because these are clearly emotional issues, not logical issues for CBMW. Remember, they Figured It All Out 20 years ago, they know everything they need to know, therefore
    they don’t actually need to listen to anyone else.

    After all, Piper has only had to exert authority two times in 40 ,years, so why should he listen to Dalrock?/s
    Cartoonish chivalry was a wonderfully concise phrase.

    Ding!

  30. Splashman says:

    Re: the video that Citizen Soldier posted (Marine vs. Female “Marine”),

    Gee. What a surprise. Who’d a thunk it?

    If I were in the military right now, I’d be gnashing my teeth. And getting out ASAP.

  31. Meh, this is an ez-duty plum of a job handed to a woman because it’s a nonsensical position. They fulfill a “number” toward EEOC, it’s a position no one, let alone a woman, could get anyone hurt from. Further, it’s the exact sort of job a woman is handed so they can photo-op her in her “Four Star” General splendor. And it’s a job a professional at the rank of Colonel could easily handle, it’s a logistics position. Utter joke. Complementary types are morons, all due respect. Any man, especially a line officer would LOVE to have that plum of a job after a decade or two serving in the terror wars (not that I think THOSE are such a good idea). So, to sum up:

    Fluff position, fluffy, chubby, four star “General”, promoted out of thin air to a position for publicity. It’s also a patriarchy hand down, her husband occupied a similar position in the Air Force also. And, he daughter was in “pilot training” when her plane clipped power lines killing her and her flight instructor. Lori Robinson owns inflated feminist-driven credentials (four stars from petty cash), her service a sham and a phony just like 99.99% of military women. These are the easy-peazy jobs, she’s probably knocking down 200,000 dollars a year with ALL the perks. Any man would love this peach of a job and the folks that would scold men for taking leave of their responsibilities of course, are simply not in touch with reality. FEMINISM is driving this, but it isn’t like women are assuming risk. That job is quite on the backs of the men. Women get the easy work, always. Ask anyone in Naval Air, although I won’t bore anyone with that tome anytime soon.

    It’s ok, Complementary feminists. The ladies volunteer, they have a free ride, it is WOMEN that made the demand for jobs in the military over the protests of men. They WANT those positions, they demand them, it is the closest thing to “Money for nothing, chicks for free” we could extend to the (mostly lesbian) ladies of the U.S. Armed Forces. Don’t blame me, Ladies.

  32. infowarrior1 says:

    @Boxer

    Just discovered how slimy Ted Cruz actually is:
    https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/trump-and-the-anti-globalist-moment/

    There goes my support for this guy down the drain.

    Trump is the only one left I will support.

  33. infowarrior1 says:

    sorry wrong thread.

  34. Mike J Baron says:

    https://app.box.com/s/4tj2n7dn4wcw8qty9h0npyrxw8rw4wy1
    (See Photo)

    WASHINGTON GOING CRAZY
    The Pentagon has given Wake Forest University $1.6 MILLION DOLLARS to study and improve the “strength” of FEMALE SOLDIERS. (I live next door to WFU in Winston-Salem, NC.) I do not fault WFU for accepting this large sum of money. What university would refuse $1.6 million?)
    It appears that FEMALE SOLDIERS incur injuries to their lower extremities at a HIGHER RATE than their male counterparts. Hmmmm, I thought if they passed all the same the tests, they were equal to male soldiers? One study from the U.S. Military Academy showed that injury rates of FEMALE SOLDIERS are 2.5 TIMES GREATER than in male soldiers.
    This new clinical trial at WFU will study the effects of strength training to prevent injuries in female runners which will ultimately help RETAIN FEMALE RECRUITS and benefit GENDER INTEGRATION efforts.
    This STUDY is timely because beginning April 1st, 225,000 previously “male-only” jobs will become open to FEMALE SOLDIERS .

    1. I was under the impression that the U.S. Military does not have the funding necessary for a strong military? But the Pentagon can spend $1.6 million for a study on FEMALE SOLDIER leg injuries? Is this how it spends its money? How many of you agree a STUDY like this could be done for $75,000 instead of $1.6 million?
    2. For centuries the military has maintained that females DO NOT BELONG IN COMBAT, and everyone agreed because the reasons are so obvious. But POLITICAL CORRECTNESS and RADICAL FEMINISM have forced today’s military Generals to reverse their position. Now U.S, Commanders must pretend that FEMALE SOLDIERS in combat are totally acceptable…even though they have 2.5 times more injuries to their extremities than male soldiers. If FEMALE SOLDIERS suffers 2.5 times as many leg injuries in battle, who will carry them back to safety?
    3. We are being fed the line that FEMALE SOLDIERS are being held to the same “high, rigid standards and tests” that male soldiers must complete, and this is a lie! Read the stories! This is false! There is now a “shortage” of FEMALE SOLDIERS, so we must recruit them and make sure they “pass.”
    This attaining the same “high standards” issue is like claiming collegiate basketball players are held to the same academic standards applied to all students. We know this isn’t true, but at least nobody is gonna be killed on the basketball court because of all the “pretending.”
    There is plenty of pressure now to place FEMALE SOLDIERS in combat, but finding them is difficult. So now we have “Affirmative Action” for FEMALE SOLDIERS not only in the military, but also for combat assignments.
    4. If you had not read this report, you probably would have never heard about this $1.6 million Pentagon Study next door at WFU and the 2.5 higher leg injury rate of female soldiers. Imagine how many other money-wasting studies and silly government projects exist because of the compulsion politicians and government bureaucrats have to spend other people’s money. This is revenue that does not exist, and therefore we are forced to borrow it.

  35. Looking Glass says:

    @Mike J:

    Women’s joints & ligaments are significantly weaker than Men’s. One of the common issues in Women’s Athletics is the higher levels of ACL & MCL tears.

    Don’t let your daughters play high school sports.😛

  36. D says:

    The military is cutting back, so I think it is an attempt to get men to not re-enlist to cut back on the severance payments.

  37. PokeSalad says:

    women in the military are a sociopolitical statement, nothing more.

    Untrue! Didn’t you see Edge of Tommorrow? Emily Blunt kicked serious butt!

  38. PokeSalad says:

    With 40 planes and about $3 million a day, the Russians were able to deliver about 9000 airstrikes in 6 months. NATO and the US, with 180 planes could not deliver a quarter of that.

    Putin, whatever else you think about him, is quite serious about war. You know how serious our CINC is.

  39. feeriker says:

    I do not fault WFU for accepting this large sum of money. What university would refuse $1.6 million?)

    I’m sure that the researchers at WFU are well aware of the conclusion that their research is to draw (i.e., that woman are just men with vaginas and a slightly elevated estrogen level, and that any injuries that they sustain under combat conditions at higher levels than penis-endowed soldiers are the result NOT of physiological differences in the vagina-endowed soldiers, but of obstacles to performance deliberately and maliciously put in place by the misogynistic penis bearers*). Any other conclusion in the opposite direction will earn WFU federal ire and a permanent closure of the funding spigot, which is of course a kiss of death to any institution of “higher learning” [sic] today.

    1. I was under the impression that the U.S. Military does not have the funding necessary for a strong military?

    The Pentagram has/will get without question funding for anything it wants. A capable fighting force just isn’t on its list of Top Five Priorities. Or even its list of Top One Thousand Priorities. Hence the fact that the U.S. chooses only Third World countries to fight (and still gets its ass kicked, but that’s fodder for a whole ‘nother blog elsewhere).

    But the Pentagon can spend $1.6 million for a study on FEMALE SOLDIER leg injuries? Is this how it spends its money?

    Again, Americans should be long over their delusion that the Pentagram is concerned with “national defense” or anything remotely related to it. There’s ZE-RO profit to be had in that, and profit-making for the Kleptoligarchy is all that matters. Pandering to preferred demographics (which includes women) is part of that game.

    (* There. I just did WFU’s research for them. They’ll be getting a bill from me for my cut of that $1.6 million.)

  40. D: “The military is cutting back, so I think it is an attempt to get men to not re-enlist to cut back on the severance payments.”

    Perhaps. However, the New England Veteran’s Admin is running commercials on radio and TV encouraging female Vets to report to the Veteran’s Admin their sexual assault stories and file a claim. 100% disability claims complete with 100% SSDI (5000/month) for life. Because a man in the military looked at her, asked her out or God forbid, committed reluctance sex on her person. It’s a racket.

    Payments galore, but my asbestos claim sits now for roughly 800 days for a hearing now. Cough cough, so much for my White Male Privilege

  41. seventiesjason says:

    more potty-training for the brave folks in the US military on the way!

  42. Pingback: The ultimate affront to cartoonish chivalry. | Dalrock

  43. Pingback: Doing the job no American man would do. — Dalrock | Assumed Guilty

Please see the comment policy linked from the top menu.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s