“Women’s desire — its inherent range and innate power — is an underestimated and constrained force, even in our times, when all can seem so sexually inundated, so far beyond restriction,” he writes. “Despite the notions our culture continues to imbue, this force is not, for the most part, sparked or sustained by emotional intimacy and safety.” In fact, he argues, “one of our most comforting assumptions, soothing perhaps above all to men but clung to by both sexes, that female eros is much better made for monogamy than the male libido, is scarcely more than a fairy tale.”
The implications are huge. As Bergner puts it: “What nascent truths will come into view, floating forward if these faiths continue to be cut apart?”
Random Angeleno on The gospel of child suppo… greenlander on The gospel of child suppo… Anonymous Reader on The gospel of child suppo… Spike on Fighting choice addiction. Splashman on Fighting choice addiction. Lost Patrol on Fighting choice addiction. innocentbystanderbos… on The gospel of child suppo… Boxer on The gospel of child suppo… Anon on Fighting choice addiction. Red Pill Latecomer on Fighting choice addiction.
- Fighting choice addiction.
- The gospel of child support.
- Incentives matter.
- Headship makes all the difference.
- Stanton's dilemma
- A very long season (part 2).
- We are trapped on Slut Island and Traditional Conservatives are our Gilligan
- More grim news for carousellers hoping to jump at the last minute.
- How to guarantee satisfaction.
- Intrasexual Competition and the Strong Independent Woman.